Poor Algo, gonna SHIT herself, Clinton IT Specialist Providing Devastating Testimony

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
Source:



Done for.

Via Fox News:

Former Hillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano, a key witness in the email probe who struck an immunity deal with the Justice Department, has told the FBI a range of details about how her personal email system was set up, according to an intelligence source close to the case who called him a “devastating witness.”

The source said Pagliano told the FBI who had access to the former secretary of state’s system – as well as when – and what devices were used, amounting to a roadmap for investigators.

“Bryan Pagliano is a devastating witness and, as the webmaster, knows exactly who had access to [Clinton’s] computer and devices at specific times. His importance to this case cannot be over-emphasized,” the intelligence source said.
 
She's above the law bro.

As long as (D) is CIC she'll not be charged with shit.

Sanders might but he can't get the 300% votes needed to get any delegates so that's not happening. If (R) doesn't win she'll NEVER be charged.
 
how do YOU know?

LOL
EMAIL
Of course the bottom lines of this story are simple:

At the time Ms. Clinton was Secretary of State there was no prohibition against the Secretary of State having a private email server. In fact, no Secretary of State before Ms. Clinton had a government email account.

None of the emails on the Secretary's personal account were classified at the time they were sent or received. That is not in dispute. There is an on-going controversy between various agencies of what ought to be classified in retrospect as the material is released to the public by the State Department, but that does not change the fact that none of it was classified at the time. In fact, one of the several emails at issue actually says the word "unclassified" in the upper left hand corner and can still be accessed by the general public on the State Department web site.

Finally, no one has ever pointed to an instance where the fact that something was on her server instead of a government server had any negative consequences whatsoever.

There is no issue here, period.

And as for the Benghazi "affair," none of the many investigations that have already been completed concerning the events surrounding the death of the American Ambassador to Libya in the Benghazi attack has found a shred of evidence that that Hillary Clinton did anything wrong whatsoever leading up to or in response to that attack.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/out-of-touch-punditry-sho_b_8029910.html

I can do this all day.
 
LOL
EMAIL
Of course the bottom lines of this story are simple:

At the time Ms. Clinton was Secretary of State there was no prohibition against the Secretary of State having a private email server. In fact, no Secretary of State before Ms. Clinton had a government email account.

None of the emails on the Secretary's personal account were classified at the time they were sent or received. That is not in dispute. There is an on-going controversy between various agencies of what ought to be classified in retrospect as the material is released to the public by the State Department, but that does not change the fact that none of it was classified at the time. In fact, one of the several emails at issue actually says the word "unclassified" in the upper left hand corner and can still be accessed by the general public on the State Department web site.

Finally, no one has ever pointed to an instance where the fact that something was on her server instead of a government server had any negative consequences whatsoever.

There is no issue here, period.

And as for the Benghazi "affair," none of the many investigations that have already been completed concerning the events surrounding the death of the American Ambassador to Libya in the Benghazi attack has found a shred of evidence that that Hillary Clinton did anything wrong whatsoever leading up to or in response to that attack.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/out-of-touch-punditry-sho_b_8029910.html

I can do this all day.
who?:cool:
 
LOL
EMAIL
Of course the bottom lines of this story are simple:

At the time Ms. Clinton was Secretary of State there was no prohibition against the Secretary of State having a private email server. In fact, no Secretary of State before Ms. Clinton had a government email account.

None of the emails on the Secretary's personal account were classified at the time they were sent or received. That is not in dispute. There is an on-going controversy between various agencies of what ought to be classified in retrospect as the material is released to the public by the State Department, but that does not change the fact that none of it was classified at the time. In fact, one of the several emails at issue actually says the word "unclassified" in the upper left hand corner and can still be accessed by the general public on the State Department web site.

Finally, no one has ever pointed to an instance where the fact that something was on her server instead of a government server had any negative consequences whatsoever.

There is no issue here, period.

And as for the Benghazi "affair," none of the many investigations that have already been completed concerning the events surrounding the death of the American Ambassador to Libya in the Benghazi attack has found a shred of evidence that that Hillary Clinton did anything wrong whatsoever leading up to or in response to that attack.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/out-of-touch-punditry-sho_b_8029910.html

I can do this all day.
Send this to the FBI, they dont know this
 
They must know. She hasn't been arrested and, like Benghazi, the only people who care about this are Republicans.

If half a dozen or more investigations into Benghazi found no wrong-doing, why are we still talking about it. Time to move on.
 
Report: FBI ‘Increasingly Certain’ Clinton Broke The Law…



Nightmare scenario for Democrats.

Via Washington Examiner:

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is losing confidence in Hillary Clinton and her mishandling of a private email server, a New York Post columnist suggested on Sunday.

“FBI chief James Comey and his investigators are increasingly certain presidential nominee Hillary Clinton violated laws in handling classified government information through her private e-mail server,” Charles Gasparino said career agents had told him.
 
The washington Examiner using the NY Post as a source..
That says it all right there. You might as well have posted an article from weazelzippers written by james O'Keefe. :rolleyes:
 
Report: FBI ‘Increasingly Certain’ Clinton Broke The Law…



Nightmare scenario for Democrats.

Via Washington Examiner:

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is losing confidence in Hillary Clinton and her mishandling of a private email server, a New York Post columnist suggested on Sunday.

“FBI chief James Comey and his investigators are increasingly certain presidential nominee Hillary Clinton violated laws in handling classified government information through her private e-mail server,” Charles Gasparino said career agents had told him.

Blah, blah, blah.

This is such old news. She's going to get away with it. Stuff like this just rolls off the Clintons' slimy backsides.
 
Back
Top