LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Another perfect example of the Left's intolerance and opposition of free speech

The only thing that I am getting out of this thread is that when a Republican is campaigning and exercising his right to free political speech, it is perfectly okay for Socialists to assemble and use their right to free speech to prevent his...

:eek:
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
The only thing that I am getting out of this thread is that when a Republican is campaigning and exercising his right to free political speech, it is perfectly okay for Socialists to assemble and use their right to free speech to prevent his...

:eek:
Click to expand...

Um...yeah.

Is that news to you? That's how it works. The First Amendment doesn't prevent or dictate any part of that. It applies to government's rule of citizens only.
 
And Trump ain't a right-winger, never was, still isn't, he just saw an opportunity to increase the legend of THE Donald and went for it.
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
Never said it wasn't.
Click to expand...

The whole notion of peaceful speech being stifled irks me.

Those pens designed to remove opposing voices from the fray offend me. They were wrong when Bush employed them. Ditto Obama.

Competing voices matter. Even when they clash. Maybe especially when they clash.
 
miles said:
Here is the petition to cancel Trump's rally on the moveon.org website. We all know what would happen if Hillary or Sanders opponents did the same thing. The world would explode.

petitions.moveon.org/sign/cancel-trumps-rally-at
Click to expand...



Yeah, the "world would explode" if someone started a petition. :rolleyes:


The rally was canceled by Trump himself. This somewhat important point keeps getting overlooked.
 
MSNBC is reporting a Trump protester(s) stormed the stage while Trump was speaking today.

They must have been there to protect his right to free speech.
 
RoryN said:
Um...yeah.

Is that news to you? That's how it works. The First Amendment doesn't prevent or dictate any part of that. It applies to government's rule of citizens only.
Click to expand...

So, then, it is okay from here on out for Republicans to assemble and shout down, disrupt and try to eliminate the free speech of the Left.

;)

The problem is, they do not engage in that behavior. Since 1968, the pattern has been consistent: this is the proclivity of the Left, to engage in the tactics of the brownshirt. This might be why Trump does it, he has always been a guy on the Left...
 
cjh said:
The whole notion of peaceful speech being stifled irks me.

Those pens designed to remove opposing voices from the fray offend me. They were wrong when Bush employed them. Ditto Obama.

Competing voices matter. Even when they clash. Maybe especially when they clash.
Click to expand...

I agree. But courtesy seems to no longer be an American trait.
 
miles said:
Poor kids are offended by Donald Trump and couldn't find their safe space, so they had a temper tantrum. Maybe they got a participation trophy to make their boo-boos feel better.

They don't like what someone is saying so their solution is silence them and make sure nobody else hears them either.

Pathetic.
Click to expand...

I quote to you your own location.
 
RoryN said:
Um...yeah.

Is that news to you? That's how it works. The First Amendment doesn't prevent or dictate any part of that. It applies to government's rule of citizens only.
Click to expand...

Not True! You must be a foreigner, huh?
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
So, then, it is okay from here on out for Republicans to assemble and shout down, disrupt and try to eliminate the free speech of the Left.

;)

The problem is, they do not engage in that behavior. Since 1968, the pattern has been consistent: this is the proclivity of the Left, to engage in the tactics of the brownshirt..
Click to expand...

The very thing they try to assign to conservatives...
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
So, then, it is okay from here on out for Republicans to assemble and shout down, disrupt and try to eliminate the free speech of the Left.
Click to expand...

Well, duh - absolutely.

But "from here on out" is bullshit. I've watched a Republican tear up my voter registration ballot before, and that ballot was my free speech. He wasn't working for the government, though - so, protection of freedom of speech didn't apply.
 
RoryN said:
Well, duh - absolutely.

But "from here on out" is bullshit. I've watched a Republican tear up my voter registration ballot before, and that ballot was my free speech. He wasn't working for the government, though - so, protection of freedom of speech didn't apply.
Click to expand...

You and your pussy cat need to go back to middle school- seems you missed some classes.
 
RoryN said:
Well, duh - absolutely.

But "from here on out" is bullshit. I've watched a Republican tear up my voter registration ballot before, and that ballot was my free speech. He wasn't working for the government, though - so, protection of freedom of speech didn't apply.
Click to expand...

A voter registration "ballot?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

UnHolyPimpHand
Wings of the Fallen ((UnHolyPimpHand & Curious_Muse))
2 3
Replies
50
Views
8K
UnHolyPimpHand
UnHolyPimpHand
Cum_Inside
Cum Inside; Grab a drink and curl up for some light reading.
Replies
5
Views
5K
ArtemisBaelin
A
K
The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
Wrong Element
Wrong Element
K
The Coming Realignment: Cities, Class and Ideology After Social Conservatism
2 3
Replies
72
Views
4K
KingOrfeo
K
LJ_Reloaded
The Nice Guy dilemma is but a symptom of a much bigger picture.
Replies
13
Views
1K
LJ_Reloaded
LJ_Reloaded
Back
Top