Another perfect example of the Left's intolerance and opposition of free speech

[cjh]

They took over the Trump rally to shut it down to keep him from speaking.

Your right to throw a punch ends when you hit someone in the nose.

You mean like that old man in the Trump rally--that sort of punch?

Trump whips his audience into a frenzy, suggesting, arguing violence is the appropriate response to dissent, and now we're supposed to cry for Trump because his words have created that potential?

Bullshit.

So long as his dissenters assemble peacefully, it is their right as Americans to gather in opposition.

 

[miles]

Trump cancelled his Nurembourg II when it became clear that his thugs didn't outnumber the protesters for a change. And the only punches I've seen thrown came from Trump supporters sneaking up on peaceful protesters.

Nice, Sean.

Make things up in a lame ass attempt to prop up a losing argument...so typical.

 

[miles]

No-one denied Trump a damn thing.

Once again if the situation were reversed you'd be going ballistic.

Show some balls and admit it.

 

[phrodeau]

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-trailguide-03112016-htmlstory.html

Chicago police: We were not consulted in decision to cancel Trump rally

Chicago police "were not consulted" and "did not provide an opinion" on Donald Trump's decision to cancel a rally in Chicago, the department said Friday night.

The department made clear to the Trump campaign that "we were confident we had the proper amount of resources dedicated to the event," interim Supt. of Police John Escalante said in a news conference.

Escalante said 200 Chicago police officers were initially deployed to the event and an additional 100 were sent as a precaution upon word that the rally might be canceled.

He said the police were "taken by surprise" at the decision to cancel, particularly since his officers told the campaign they could "could guarantee safe access and exit to Mr. Trump."

 

[Sean]

Nice, Sean.

Make things up in a lame ass attempt to prop up a losing argument...so typical.

What did I make up? And, if you haven't noticed, you're getting the shit kicked out of you in this argument. As usual.

 

[Sean]

Once again if the situation were reversed you'd be going ballistic.

Show some balls and admit it.

No-one denied Trump a damn thing.

 

[miles]

What did I make up? .

Maybe it was a different Sean who said this:

"the only punches I've seen thrown came from Trump supporters sneaking up on peaceful protesters."

Can you provide evidence this happened last night?

 

[cjh]

No-one denied Trump a damn thing.

There is a real symmetry in Trump's belief that neither trade nor ideas merit a free market.

 

[miles]

No-one denied Trump a damn thing.

I'l say it in the form of a question:

If Trump supporters disrupted a Democrat candidate's rally to silence him would you think that's appropriate?

Yes or no.

 

[Sean]

There is a real symmetry in Trump's belief that neither trade nor ideas merit a free market.

Miles, as usual, will defend any type of Nazi behaviour as long as the protagonist has an (R) next to his name. Trump is reaping what he has sown. As, on a bigger level, has the GOP.

 

[miles]

There is a real symmetry in Trump's belief that neither trade nor ideas merit a free market.

Give me a few examples.

 

[Sean]

I'l say it in the form of a question:

If Trump supporters disrupted a Democrat candidate's rally to silence him would you think that's appropriate?

Yes or no.

I think they have a right to protest, as loudly as they want.

 

[Disgustipated]

Trump cancelled his Nurembourg II when it became clear that his thugs didn't outnumber the protesters for a change. And the only punches I've seen thrown came from Trump supporters sneaking up on peaceful protesters.

So it's okay to deny someone a right to speak if you disagree with them.

Do you know what that's called?

The Chicago PD have already said they had no involvement in cancelling or even suggesting that Drumpf shut down the event.

Do you know what that means?

Yes or no.

 

[cjh]

I'l say it in the form of a question:

If Trump supporters disrupted a Democrat candidate's rally to silence him would you think that's appropriate?

Yes or no.

Depends on the way in which the disruption occurred.

 

[Sean]

Give me a few examples.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...curb-press-freedom-libel-laws-first-amendment

 

[miles]

Miles, as usual, will defend any type of Nazi behaviour as long as the protagonist has an (R) next to his name. Trump is reaping what he has sown. As, on a bigger level, has the GOP.

Excellent Sean!

Bring up Nazis and deflect the blame.

You're totally incapable of a rational discussion.

Nazis.

 

[phrodeau]

No-one denied Trump a damn thing.

Yep, quite the opposite.

Donald ran scared.

I can imagine this conversation in the campaign HQ:

"Where are we going to be just before the Illinois primary?"

"I've got you booked in Chicago."

"Chicago? Are you nuts? I ain't going to Chicago for nothing. Their cops can't even handle a few hundred street thugs. Find a way to get us out of it."

"Such as?"

"I don't know... maybe make their protesters look like a threat."

 

[Sean]

Excellent Sean!

Bring up Nazis and deflect the blame.

You're totally incapable of a rational discussion.

Nazis.

Are you going to call Obama the fuhrer again now?

 

[RobDownSouth]

So if you don't agree with someone you have a right to silence him.

Sounds just like the Third Reich to me.

Idiot.

Excellent Miles!

Bring up Nazis and deflect the blame.

You're totally incapable of a rational discussion.

Nazis.

 

[miles]

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...curb-press-freedom-libel-laws-first-amendment

You said "the only punches I've seen thrown came from Trump supporters sneaking up on peaceful protesters."

I asked you for a few examples.

The link says nothing about your claim.

Nice try, liar.

Want to make anything else up to cover your lie?

 

[phrodeau]

I'l say it in the form of a question:

If Trump supporters disrupted a Democrat candidate's rally to silence him would you think that's appropriate?

Yes or no.

Was it you who was complaining loud and long about the "protest zones" at Obama's rallies in 2008? Then somebody pointed out that Bush's rallies had the same "protest zones" in 2004.

Fun times.

 

[cjh]

Give me a few examples.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/11/u...prod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share

"Mr. Trump could become the first Republican nominee in nearly a century who has called for higher import taxes as a defense against low-cost imports."

Sean gave you a great example of his desire to stifle the free market of ideas by weakening first amendment defenses to defamation laws.

 

[Sean]

You said "the only punches I've seen thrown came from Trump supporters sneaking up on peaceful protesters."

I asked you for a few examples.

The link says nothing about your claim.

Nice try, liar.

Want to make anything else up to cover your lie?

Learn to read. Maybe have your wife explain the big words to you?

There is a real symmetry in Trump's belief that neither trade nor ideas merit a free market.

Give me a few examples.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...curb-press-freedom-libel-laws-first-amendment

 

[RobDownSouth]

You said "the only punches I've seen thrown came from Trump supporters sneaking up on peaceful protesters."

I asked you for a few examples.

The link says nothing about your claim.

Nice try, liar.

Want to make anything else up to cover your lie?

Here ya go

 

[RoryN]

The biggest blemish on our nation right now isn't Trump or his supporters - it's the fact that so many Americans apparently have no fucking clue what "freedom of speech" per the First Amendment actually means, and what it doesn't mean.