Justice Dept grants immunity to staffer who set up Clinton email server...

WELL, WELL: Justice Dept. grants immunity to staffer who set up Clinton email server.

The Justice Department has granted immunity to the former State Department staffer who worked on Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email server, a sign the FBI investigation into possible criminal wrongdoing is progressing.

A senior U.S. law enforcement official said the FBI had secured the cooperation of Bryan Pagliano who worked on Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009.

As the FBI looks to wrap up its investigation in the coming months, agents will likely want to interview Clinton and her senior aides about the decision to use a private server, how it was set up, and whether any of the participants knew they were sending classified information in emails, current and former officials said.

The inquiry comes against a sensitive political backdrop in which Clinton is the favorite to secure the Democratic nomination for the presidency.

http://cdn.pjmedia.com/instapundit/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Screen-Shot-2016-03-02-at-9.09.23-PM-600x270.png


http://cdn.pjmedia.com/instapundit/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Screen-Shot-2016-03-02-at-9.24.27-PM-600x267.png
 
The problem with the little RW narrative here is this.

"As we have said since last summer, Secretary Clinton has been cooperating with the Justice Department's security inquiry, including offering in August to meet with them to assist their efforts if needed," said Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Clinton's presidential campaign.

Fallon added that the campaign was "pleased" Pagliano was cooperating with the Justice Department.

Last fall, when Pagliano invoked his Fifth Amendment rights and declined to talk to congressional investigators, Fallon said: "(Clinton has) encouraged everyone to cooperate because we want to make every good-faith effort to be transparent and answer any questions people have. With Mr. Pagliano, we encouraged him as well because we don't think he has any reason to not be transparent about the help that he provided from an IT perspective, but unfortunately, it is his choice what to do."


It's curious that the "right" repeatedly fails to mention that vast majority (if not all, I've yet to see a single piece marked beforehand) of the emails they're touting as "classified" we UPGRADED to sensitive after the fact and weren't at the time they were sent.
 
Last edited:
Why did you lie about teh MUSLIM woman who BEHEADED a BABY?
 
DizzyBooby, following me around like a slobbering retarded puppy isn't going to get you anywhere.

I've already addressed your question in the appropriate thread.

It's going to be a stiff slap on the nose with a rolled up Daily Mail for you.
 
DizzyBooby, following me around like a slobbering retarded puppy isn't going to get you anywhere.

I've already addressed your question in the appropriate thread.

It's going to be a stiff slap on the nose with a rolled up Daily Mail for you.

Dressed in a BURKA

Screaming ALLAH AKBAR

and YOU said she isnt MUSLIM

and its NOT relevant

WHY DID YOU LIE?????????????????
 
Back
Top