The oh so boring left.

[RUlookingup]

It has finally sunk in with the Left that Trump is for real. The disdain among many for the far left continues to drive this election. In other words, "the jig is up". That does sound familiar. Prepare to hoist.

 

[Iceprincess12]

It has finally sunk in with the Left that Trump is for real. The disdain among many for the far left continues to drive this election. In other words, "the jig is up". That does sound familiar. Prepare to hoist.

Boring is just as important in Presidents as in a poster...

Happy Tuesday!

 

[sr71plt]

What's sunk in with the left is that Trump's actually going to hoodwink a great number of dumb rightists into not realizing he's on the left.

 

[RUlookingup]

What's sunk in with the left is that Trump's actually going to hoodwink a great number of dumb rightists into not realizing he's on the left.

As long as he is not an automaton like the rest of the field. He is fine with me. Cruz and Rubio are Hispanic affirmative action figures who are both learly delusional and incompetent. Bernie is a Socialist Brooklyn Jew who I hope beats Mom Jeans the liar, yeah that's the ticket. Either way Trump should thrash both of them in the General election. Partisan robots need not apply, time for an actual leader. Take me to the pilot. Lead me through the chamber. Take me to the pilot. I am but a stranger. Na Na Na, Na Na Na, Na Na Na, Na Na Na Na Na na

 

[sr71plt]

I could have guessed that Trump would be OK with you.

 

[RUlookingup]

I could have guessed that Trump would be OK with you.

OK.....I have been on board the whole way. He is using the media to hoist the left by their own petard. A beautiful strategy. The anointed one and the Socialist can not compete. Neither can the right's affirmative action robots. Trump 2016. Get used to it flyguy.

 

[sr71plt]

OK.....I have been on board the whole way. He is using the media to hoist the left by their own petard. A beautiful strategy. The anointed one and the Socialist can not compete. Neither can the right's affirmative action robots. Trump 2016. Get used to it flyguy.

You don't seem to have been on board with Trump for very long at all. Before he decided to run as a Republican, he wasn't a Republican at all. He once was registered to something called the Reform Party and he contributed heavily to Democratic candidates. He publicly endorsed abortion rights and gay rights, slammed the Bush administration, and generally exhibited (as Cruz said) as a New York liberal. So, methinks you just don't have a clue where "the whole way" started. You are just one of his dupes (and dopes).

But then you don't seem to have a clue about much of anything. You're drinking Trump's Kool-Aid (probably while you are hoist on your jig is up petard).

 

[lovecraft68]

This is yet another in a series of lose/lose elections for America, which is why we're in the shape we're in.

But I don't think Trump's backers are anymore duped or deluded than anyone who thinks Hillary has a shred of integrity or is even semi competent, let alone if she were anyone else she'd be indicted by now.

 

[RUlookingup]

You don't seem to have been on board with Trump for very long at all. Before he decided to run as a Republican, he wasn't a Republican at all. He once was registered to something called the Reform Party and he contributed heavily to Democratic candidates. He publicly endorsed abortion rights and gay rights, slammed the Bush administration, and generally exhibited (as Cruz said) as a New York liberal. So, methinks you just don't have a clue where "the whole way" started. You are just one of his dupes (and dopes).

But then you don't seem to have a clue about much of anything. You're drinking Trump's Kool-Aid (probably while you are hoist on your jig is up petard).

Well well. If it isn't old smarter than everybody else liberal pilot boy. Thanks for your knowledge. Thought it didn't effect you? Trump will win. He is a leader, the rest are politicians.

 

[sr71plt]

Well well. If it isn't old smarter than everybody else liberal pilot boy. Thanks for your knowledge. Thought it didn't effect you? Trump will win. He is a leader, the rest are politicians.

Apparently smarter than you by your own nonsubstantive response (although, admittedly, that wouldn't take much) if Trump is your man and you haven't even bothered to check up on who he is/what he has done. It's not like the man has been living outside of the spotlight for the last thirty years. (And he's been a politician that long too.)

You're just one of his dupes/dopes.

 

[RUlookingup]

Apparently smarter than you by your own nonsubstantive response (although, admittedly, that wouldn't take much) if Trump is your man and you haven't even bothered to check up on who he is/what he has done. It's not like the man has been living outside of the spotlight for the last thirty years. (And he's been a politician that long too.)

You're just one of his dupes/dopes.

How testy the smarter than thou left can get. So used to telling people what they ought to be thinking. But of course, none of it will affect you.

 

[sr71plt]

How testy the smarter than thou left can get. So used to telling people what they ought to be thinking. But of course, none of it will affect you.

Yeah, it's sort of too bad that folks like you have to have someone to tell you you need to think--and then you just don't think anyway.

We can go on like this forever--or at least until you realize how stupid you're being. So, forever, I guess.

Still can't come up with a post showing substance and thought to any depth higher than elementary school, can you?

 

[Sean Renaud]

This is yet another in a series of lose/lose elections for America, which is why we're in the shape we're in.

But I don't think Trump's backers are anymore duped or deluded than anyone who thinks Hillary has a shred of integrity or is even semi competent, let alone if she were anyone else she'd be indicted by now.

You can doubt her integrity but not her competence. Not if you have any integrity to speak of.

 

[RUlookingup]

Yeah, it's sort of too bad that folks like you have to have someone to tell you you need to think--and then you just don't think anyway.

We can go on like this forever--or at least until you realize how stupid you're being. So, forever, I guess.

Still can't come up with a post showing substance and thought to any depth higher than elementary school, can you?

You are a Quisling, son. An American traitor, you will be sent to Jupiter with Cher. I got you Babe.

 

[RUlookingup]

You can doubt her integrity but not her competence. Not if you have any integrity to speak of.

You can't question her competence? Why not? She is a lying Brian Williams. Who lies about being under sniper fire?

 

[RUlookingup]

Sr71plt can you point out one of your posts where you don't come off as a pompous,smarter than thou, doesn't really affect me prick?

 

[sr71plt]

You are a Quisling, son. An American traitor, you will be sent to Jupiter with Cher. I got you Babe.

Guess you don't have any idea how empty, silly, and boring that is. Are you old enough to be posting to Literotica?

 

[Sean Renaud]

You can't question her competence? Why not? She is a lying Brian Williams. Who lies about being under sniper fire?

That would be her integrity, not her competency.

 

[JackLuis]

That would be her integrity, not her competency.

I would question her judgment. Her insistence to interfere in Libya and Syria, primarily, her voting for the Iraq war was just a knee jerk reaction.

Aside from her social agenda, she has not shown me that she is a leader I would follow.

 

[RUlookingup]

Guess you don't have any idea how empty, silly, and boring that is. Are you old enough to be posting to Literotica?

I'm old enough to know better than to argue with a coot like you.

 

[RUlookingup]

I would question her judgment. Her insistence to interfere in Libya and Syria, primarily, her voting for the Iraq war was just a knee jerk reaction.

Aside from her social agenda, she has not shown me that she is a leader I would follow.

JackLuis on that we can agree.

 

[RUlookingup]

That would be her integrity, not her competency.

They are inherently tied together Sean. Integrity comes before all else. She is a compulsive liar and a bad one at that.

 

[Sean Renaud]

They are inherently tied together Sean. Integrity comes before all else. She is a compulsive liar and a bad one at that.

No they are not only not inherently tied together one could make a strong argument that for a politician they can only exist in opposition. You can say integrity is your #1 thing of importance and that you don't care if she gets the job done if she's an evil liar, but not that she doesn't get shit done.

 

[sr71plt]

I would question her judgment. Her insistence to interfere in Libya and Syria, primarily, her voting for the Iraq war was just a knee jerk reaction.

What makes you think you know what her individual role was in either Libya or Syria policy? There are a whole bunch of people who make up the foreign policy team. What gives you inside knowledge of her positions on these issues while SecState? Did some of her e-mails go to you personally?

And as far as the Iraq war vote, as noted ad nauseam before, A. she was the senator from the state of the Twin Towers; she voted her constituency and would have been lynched if she hadn't, and B. the vote wasn't what the carrion picking at her are depicting it as. The vote was to invoke war powers to give the administration permission to go on a wartime footing--it didn't approve how the administration actually went to war and it was based on made up advice on who they should go to war with.

It's seen as a bad vote mainly in hindsight based on a whole lot of information not given them. And it suckers an electorate who thinks it knows more than it does based on nothing in particular to misunderstand. I just wish she'd take the time to educate people on this. But of course they wouldn't believe her, because they don't want to.

 

[JackLuis]

No they are not only not inherently tied together one could make a strong argument that for a politician they can only exist in opposition. You can say integrity is your #1 thing of importance and that you don't care if she gets the job done if she's an evil liar, but not that she doesn't get shit done.

Can you point out one, or more, cases where she got shit done that wouldn't have gotten do without her? I can't think of any.