Another maniac with a gun fires into a crowd.

Do you really believe that cops traveling in pairs is a new thing?

Go watch some Car 54 and Dragnet reruns.

The cops left that model in favor of rapid response dispatching and individual officers in individual cars a long time since dragnet. Because computers.
 
The cops left that model in favor of rapid response dispatching and individual officers in individual cars a long time since dragnet. Because computers.
Computers? More likely they wanted to sleep, drink and fool around on duty without a witness.

Two-cop teams are the norm in LA and NYC, and have been for decades.
 
For decades these common sense solutions have been working in all other westernized nations, why do you think they wouldn’t work in your own?
No one is (actively) "talking" about it because it is a non-starter in America. Hillary in a nod to the antigun nuts who actually do want such things recently said that an Australian style registration, ban and confiscation was "worth considering"

Well Ish is, even if it’s just in the form of a strawman to preserve the current status quo, everyone else knows that it’s unrealistic.

Never mind that if such a thing had a snowballs chance in hell of being enacted, in order to be as modestly successful as the Aussie ban which got a mere 20% of guns out of circulation, you would have to pick up (and pay for ) 60 million guns.

Why would anyone have to pay for the confiscation of an illegally held gun?

So lets say you did that. That leaves 240 million plus guns left. None of the 60 million <registered> guns picked up in such a scheme will have been registered by criminals forbidden already to have them.

A reasonable objective isn’t to totally shut off the supply of guns to the criminal kind and the mentally incapable totally. A reasonable objective is to turn the tap a revolution or so and stop things like untraceable gun shows, illegal selling, secondary selling and reduce the number of guns stolen/lost per year.

I forget the exact figure, but from memory every year 500k, that’s half a million guns are lost/stolen in the US. Is that what you call responsible ownership? What is the penalty for this? So every year you top up the criminally held guns by well over ½ mill is this responsible?

You still have the worlds largest mass of privately held guns by a huge margin, so what, exactly has that accomplished? Nothing.

Anything short of that is a complete waste of time. Nothing you can possibly propose sort of 100% ban and house to house sweeps will make a dent into the availability of guns. It is all hot air designed to appease the left and to irritate the fuck out of the right who tend to be gun owners. Nothing more.

So fuck it just give up huh? Put up with the ridiculous murder rates and shrug at each mass shooting huh?

Perhaps in a year you will have achieved little that is noticeable. I know you guys have a short attention span and like instant solutions, but, over a period of say 10 years you will have substantially reduced the number of criminally held guns and those available to the mentally ill that can only filter through to less shootings over all.

Woof!
 
Well of course this has nothing to do with the socio-economic conditions in to which most of them are born, are white poor people more likely to commit crime? Oh Ish, we might have just hit on how the oppression persists.

Strangely there is little crime against the Queen, various Dukes and Lords so long the oppressors in this country, how about that!

Of course the easy way out is to blame the darkie, huh and massage the figures down and shout "we don't have a problem it's all them."

Woof!

Ignoring the rest of your crap, poor whites, by shear numbers, far out number poor blacks. Population demographics and distribution dictate that to be true (as well as raw statistics). If socio-economic conditions were the sole driver of crime then the proportion of blacks representing the perpetrators of murder, burglary, robbery, and assault would be far lower. Since that is NOT the case there must be some other factor at work.....ya think?

Ishmael
 
Winner, I believe, of the 2015 Literotica's Biggest Ego Display Award!

"I Believe."

Don't tell us, I bet you used to "believe" in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy, too, yey?

http://media3.giphy.com/media/iKkUkjlcxCizu/giphy.gif

http://38.media.tumblr.com/259cce9f6f0bdab3ecc2e9ffcd8a710c/tumblr_inline_n7hokvXyhG1sos8f4.gif

http://images.mentalfloss.com/sites/default/files/styles/insert_main_wide_image/public/giphy.gif

Ahhh, these quaint lil' thread socials bring out all the two-left-footed wallflower schmucks onto the dance floor during the slow numbers, I tells ya! :D

Well of course this has nothing to do with the socio-economic conditions in to which most of them are born, are white poor people more likely to commit crime? Oh Ish, we might have just hit on how the oppression persists.

Strangely there is little crime against the Queen, various Dukes and Lords so long the oppressors in this country, how about that!

Of course the easy way out is to blame the darkie, huh and massage the figures down and shout "we don't have a problem it's all them."

Woof!

http://38.media.tumblr.com/db6ca23ce7ba5f88f8c79cd74dc89c89/tumblr_ngjv7oVjr61s2wio8o1_500.gif
 
Ignoring the rest of your crap, poor whites, by shear numbers, far out number poor blacks. Population demographics and distribution dictate that to be true (as well as raw statistics). If socio-economic conditions were the sole driver of crime then the proportion of blacks representing the perpetrators of murder, burglary, robbery, and assault would be far lower. Since that is NOT the case there must be some other factor at work.....ya think?

Ishmael

Well of course you would!

Perhaps you'd like to go back and highlight where I said that economics were the "sole driver of crime" because what I think I wrote was socio-economic.

Socio-economics is not just an observation of poverty ya dullard!

Which means not only their relative poverty but also how that poverty effects behavioral interactions of individuals and groups with-in that society (sic Neighbourhood)

So no there is not one sole driver here and I never said there was.

Where-as, on the other hand the only explanation you've offered so far is that they are black and use that as an excuse and a way of massaging your appalling murder rates down; how does that make you look? And yes I can quote you if you wish.

Just while we're chatting, though, perhaps you can tell us how many middle class black Americans living in the leafy suburbs go around shooting one another, not many huh?

Woof!
 
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/29/us-indiana-shooting-idUSKCN0SM2Z220151029

Three people were wounded by gunfire on Wednesday evening inside the Washington Square Mall on the east side of Indianapolis, an Indianapolis Metropolitan Police spokesman said.

The three victims managed to run through a Target Store connected to the mall after the shooting and they were taken to nearby hospitals, Indianapolis Police Sergeant Kendale Adams said.

Indianapolis police responded to the mall at about 6:30 p.m. on reports of multiple people shot, the Indianapolis Star newspaper reported.
Stay away from the Target's, people.
 
These two short sentences sum up the US government's views and ideology:

1) The government tells us NOT TO JUDGE ALL MUSLIMS because of a FEW lunatics.

2) The government ENCOURAGES US TO JUDGE ALL GUN OWNERS because of a FEW lunatics.
 
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/21/us/michigan-kalamazoo-county-shooting-spree/

(CNN)At least six people were killed during a shooting spree Kalamazoo County, Michigan, authorities said.

In all, eight people were shot in three locations Saturday, Kalamazoo County Undersheriff Paul Matyas told CNN. Two people, including a child, are in critical condition; one person is in serious condition.

All three shooting incidents appear to be related, authorities said.

Police have a "strong suspect" in custody, Kalamazoo Public Safety Chief Jeff Hadley told CNN affiliate WWMT.
 
These two short sentences sum up the US government's views and ideology:

1) The government tells us NOT TO JUDGE ALL MUSLIMS because of a FEW lunatics.

2) The government ENCOURAGES US TO JUDGE ALL GUN OWNERS because of a FEW lunatics.

Muslims don't kill 10,000 Americans every year. Gun owners do. It's more of a priority thing. And a 'in your own backyard' thing.
 
Another person whines about guns because he doesn't like them.

I actually like guns. Real cool techy shit and history. Did a tree carving of an 1875 double barrelled shotgun with hammers. Spent time in the armed forces. Am an excellent shot. Operated the clubs kids pellet gun range in club basement.

Would love to skeet shoot or do biathlon. Deer hunting in my county must be done with bow, shotgun or black powder. Muzzle loaders sound like fun. I have a bow myself. A buddy went to France this year as a Battle of Waterloo re-enactor. COOL!

Goose guns, moose guns and muzzle loaders are fine by me. 9s and ARs you can shove up your ass before you send it off to the smelter.
 
Ignoring the rest of your crap, poor whites, by shear numbers, far out number poor blacks. Population demographics and distribution dictate that to be true (as well as raw statistics). If socio-economic conditions were the sole driver of crime then the proportion of blacks representing the perpetrators of murder, burglary, robbery, and assault would be far lower. Since that is NOT the case there must be some other factor at work.....ya think?

Ishmael

Are you suggesting it is a racial thing? That blacks are pre-disposed to committing more crimes than whites? Even within same economic class and taking away any influences of racial discrimination.
 
I actually like guns. Real cool techy shit and history. Did a tree carving of an 1875 double barrelled shotgun with hammers. Spent time in the armed forces. Am an excellent shot. Operated the clubs kids pellet gun range in club basement.

Would love to skeet shoot or do biathlon. Deer hunting in my county must be done with bow, shotgun or black powder. Muzzle loaders sound like fun. I have a bow myself. A buddy went to France this year as a Battle of Waterloo re-enactor. COOL!

Goose guns, moose guns and muzzle loaders are fine by me. 9s and ARs you can shove up your ass before you send it off to the smelter.

Yea, because they are black...and very scary!
 
Update, only six killed. The girl police thought had died has been upgraded to clinging to life.

Apparently God wasn't satisfied with making her suffer being shot, he's now forcing her to hold on a bit longer to draw out his compassion.
 
Back
Top