BUSYBODY withdraws his support of TrumpTantrum

NEW YORK TIMES: Cruz and Rubio’s Historic Performance In Iowa Isn’t Historic At All, Because They’re Not Really Latino.

“Glad to have this on the record and stated forthrightly: Only liberals can be minorities. Period.”
 
meanwhile the NEXT Vee Pee, the REAL SPIC, J Castro is LEARNING how to SPIC Spanish
 
Marco Rubio finished in third in Iowa — a “strong third” in which he outperformed his polls, but third nevertheless. And yet, his chances of winning the Republican nomination nearly doubled according to the bookmaker Betfair, from about 30 percent before the Iowa caucuses to 55 percent now.1 Meanwhile, Donald Trump, who finished ahead of Rubio although behind Ted Cruz, saw his chances halved from 50 percent to 25 percent.

Even if you acknowledge the importance of the “expectations game,” isn’t that a little excessive? Well, maybe.2 But I think Betfair is coming up with approximately the right answer.

Here’s why: Presidential nominations are a lot like the stock market. In the long run, they’re reasonably well governed by the fundamentals. In the short run, they can be crazy. Iowa represented the equivalent of a stock market correction, a sign that sanity might prevail after all.
Nate Silver

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features...bio-and-donald-trump-nomination-odds-so-much/
 
I would love to see teh WHITE fake HISPANIC, Cruz....he of teh paisley PJs

or

rubio
 
he became SHAMEFUL after Iowa

disgraceful

what does he say thats UNREASONABLE?

What...exactly...after Iowa?

Please oh please oh omniscient busybody who knows all and I am simply an ignorant peon.

I must know your analysis!

I MUST!
 
Get on the Rubio bandwagon before it's too crowded to get a good seat.
 
Back
Top