First US Slave Owners Were Black

Pairaclities

Literotica Guru
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Posts
1,292
I wonder how many black school students know this part of their history?

America’s first slave owner was a black man.

According to colonial records, the first slave owner in the United States was a black man.

Prior to 1655 there were no legal slaves in the colonies, only indentured servants. All masters were required to free their servants after their time was up. Seven years was the limit that an indentured servant could be held. Upon their release they were granted50 acres of land. This included any Negro purchased from slave traders. Negros were also granted 50 acres upon their release.

Anthony Johnson was a Negro from modern-day Angola. He was brought to the US to work on a tobacco farm in 1619. In 1622 he was almost killed when Powhatan Indians attacked the farm. 52 out of 57 people on the farm perished in the attack. He married a female black servant while working on the farm.

When Anthony was released he was legally recognized as a “free Negro” and ran a successful farm. In 1651 he held 250 acres and five black indentured servants. In 1654, it was time for Anthony to release John Casor, a black indentured servant. Instead Anthony told Casor he was extending his time. Casor left and became employed by the free white man Robert Parker.

Anthony Johnson sued Robert Parker in the Northampton Court in 1654. In 1655, the court ruled that Anthony Johnson could hold John Casor indefinitely. The court gave judicial sanction for blacksto own slave of their own race. Thus Casor became the first permanent slave and Johnson the first slave owner.

Whites still could not legally hold a black servant as an indefinite slave until 1670. In that year, the colonial assembly passed legislation permitting free whites, blacks, and Indians the right to own blacks as slaves.

By 1699, the number of free blacks prompted fears of a “Negro insurrection.” Virginia Colonial ordered the repatriation of freed blacks back to Africa. Many blacks sold themselves to white masters so they would not have to go to Africa. This was the first effort to gently repatriate free blacks back to Africa. The modern nations of Sierra Leone and Liberia both originated as colonies of repatriated former black slaves.

However, black slave owners continued to thrive in the United States.

By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. By 1860 there were about 3,000 slaves owned by black households in the city of New Orleans alone.

Sources:
John Casor
Anthony Johnson
 
wow you right, white peeps neva done no wrong because a black man hads a slave. fuck mlk an obamana...am i right frfr brah.

ps
yous an idiot
 
Slavery was NEVER about race. It was about greedy capitalist fat cats (plantation owners) not wanting to pay their employees. Similar to them wanting cheap foreign labor today rather than paying Americans fair market wages.

Its a story of capitalist greed, not race.
 
wow you right, white peeps neva done no wrong because a black man hads a slave. fuck mlk an obamana...am i right frfr brah.

ps
yous an idiot

No, we haven't. We deserve a thank you for ending slavery and implementing the civil rights movement, not to mention bringing modern democracy and human rights to the world.
 
Slavery has gone on since biblical times.
 
wow you right, white peeps neva done no wrong because a black man hads a slave. fuck mlk an obamana...am i right frfr brah.

ps
yous an idiot

Really? That's what you think this was about?
It ties in nicely with MLK Day don't you think?

Wouldn't it be great if all students understood the whole story?
You know, really be politically correct and educate everyone - black, white, brown, yellow, and even fucking green.

I think the idiot here is the the one who jumped to a wrong conclusion about a post, and replied with racist drivel.
 
I wonder how many black school students know this part of their history?




wow you right, white peeps neva done no wrong because a black man hads a slave. fuck mlk an obamana...am i right frfr brah.

ps
yous an idiot

Really? That's what you think this was about?
It ties in nicely with MLK Day don't you think?

Wouldn't it be great if all students understood the whole story?
You know, really be politically correct and educate everyone - black, white, brown, yellow, and even fucking green.


I think the idiot here is the the one who jumped to a wrong conclusion about a post, and replied with racist drivel.


I beg to differ.
 
Really? That's what you think this was about?
It ties in nicely with MLK Day don't you think?

Wouldn't it be great if all students understood the whole story?
You know, really be politically correct and educate everyone - black, white, brown, yellow, and even fucking green.

I think the idiot here is the the one who jumped to a wrong conclusion about a post, and replied with racist drivel.

lol brah... "I wonder how many black school students know this part of their history?"

so now you a racist idiot..good job brah
 
Slavery was NEVER about race. It was about greedy capitalist fat cats (plantation owners) not wanting to pay their employees. Similar to them wanting cheap foreign labor today rather than paying Americans fair market wages.

Its a story of capitalist greed, not race.

So segregation wasn't about race either?

Miss me with the bullshit.
 
So segregation wasn't about race either?

Miss me with the bullshit.

Segregation was about Plessy v Fergusson.

Prior to 1895 segregation was spotty across the South. The old newspapers are fulla reports of events that were integrated. When my great grandmother graduated college in 1891, scholars from all the county's high schools attended the graduation banquet, and two of the kids were from the two black high schools. This was at Tallahassee. But separate and equal and Jim Crow became the law in 1895.

William Johnson, a wealthy black planter of Natchez, Mississippi kept a diary, now in book form, and reported numerous and frequent social intercourse with whites; he was prolly the richest man in town. The book title is, THE BARBER OF NATCHEZ.

http://www.nps.gov/natc/learn/historyculture/williamjohnson.htm
 
Aren't you sort of ignoring the 150 years of the Atlantic Slave trade that preceded the Virginia Colony?

Now you can tell me how they were all sold into slavery by other Africans, and don't forget to expound on the huge number who sold themselves into slavery to avoid being returned to Africa.

All of which proves the Justice of African in Slavery, I guess.
 
They used to teach the difference between slavery and indentured servitude when I was in school...

:eek:

I guess it's not all that in vogue anymore.
 
Segregation was about Plessy v Fergusson.

Prior to 1895 segregation was spotty across the South. The old newspapers are fulla reports of events that were integrated. When my great grandmother graduated college in 1891, scholars from all the county's high schools attended the graduation banquet, and two of the kids were from the two black high schools. This was at Tallahassee. But separate and equal and Jim Crow became the law in 1895.

William Johnson, a wealthy black planter of Natchez, Mississippi kept a diary, now in book form, and reported numerous and frequent social intercourse with whites; he was prolly the richest man in town. The book title is, THE BARBER OF NATCHEZ.

http://www.nps.gov/natc/learn/historyculture/williamjohnson.htm

Miss me with the bullshit.
 
They used to teach the difference between slavery and indentured servitude when I was in school...

I guess it's not all that in vogue anymore.

Tell that to any of the black slaves imported by the Spanish and Portuguese.

Indentured for Life isn't quite the same as Indentured for 7 years either, but hey, it wraps up the whole matter in a nice legal package.

He broke a contract in 1655! A contract! A sacred contract!
 
They used to teach the difference between slavery and indentured servitude when I was in school...

:eek:

I guess it's not all that in vogue anymore.

There were all kinds of legal associations back then. Look up villainy. A village was a place villains lived.

c. 1300 (late 12c. as a surname), "base or low-born rustic," from Anglo-French and Old French vilain "peasant, farmer, commoner, churl, yokel" (12c.), from Medieval Latin villanus "farmhand," from Latin villa "country house, farm" (see villa).
The most important phases of the sense development of this word may be summed up as follows: 'inhabitant of a farm; peasant; churl, boor; clown; miser; knave, scoundrel.' Today both Fr. vilain and Eng. villain are used only in a pejorative sense. [Klein]
 
Last edited:
SUI GENERIS

1787, Latin, literally "of one's own kind, peculiar." First element from sui, genitive of suus "his, her, its, one's," from Old Latin sovos, from PIE root *swe-, pronoun of the third person (see idiom).

In the old days a truly free person was SUI GENERIS. Meaning, unassociated with any distinct social class or legally defined group. It later evolved to define emancipated teens (married girls or boys 21 years old). People who did not require masters or parents or patrons, etc.
 
Aren't you sort of ignoring the 150 years of the Atlantic Slave trade that preceded the Virginia Colony?

Now you can tell me how they were all sold into slavery by other Africans, and don't forget to expound on the huge number who sold themselves into slavery to avoid being returned to Africa.

All of which proves the Justice of African in Slavery, I guess.

And the Dutch, and the French. Then there were the Arab slave traders that were doing the capture and sale on the African continent.

Everyone was in on it.

Ishmael
 
And the Dutch, and the French. Then there were the Arab slave traders that were doing the capture and sale on the African continent.

Everyone was in on it.

Ishmael

which makes it right and just?
 
which makes it right and just?

Did I say that? Everyone had their own game going and blacks weren't the only ones victimized by the practice. The greater part of the worlds population was in some sort of slavery/servitude back then.

So all of this whining and crying over someone's great-granddaddy being a slave kind a falls on deaf ears in my case. The question I ask is simple, "Are you living in slavery now?" If the answer is "No," then my response is, "Then shut the fuck up and get on with your life. I'm devoid of guilt or responsibility for your life."

Ishmael
 
Oooh, we're playin' Vettebingo again!!

Did I say that? Everyone had their own game going and blacks weren't the only ones victimized by the practice. The greater part of the worlds population was in some sort of slavery/servitude back then.

So all of this whining and crying over someone's great-granddaddy being a slave kind a falls on deaf ears in my case. The question I ask is simple, "Are you living in slavery now?" If the answer is "No," then my response is, "Then shut the fuck up and get on with your life. I'm devoid of guilt or responsibility for your life."

Ishmael

They need to "get over it"?

G-4

http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/vettebingo_zps8643920c.gif
 
I wonder how many black school students know this part of their history?

America’s first slave owner was a black man.

According to colonial records, the first slave owner in the United States was a black man.

Prior to 1655 there were no legal slaves in the colonies, only indentured servants.
Wrong.
All masters were required to free their servants after their time was up. Seven years was the limit that an indentured servant could be held. Upon their release they were granted50 acres of land. This included any Negro purchased from slave traders. Negros were also granted 50 acres upon their release.

Anthony Johnson was a Negro from modern-day Angola. He was brought to the US to work on a tobacco farm in 1619. In 1622 he was almost killed when Powhatan Indians attacked the farm. 52 out of 57 people on the farm perished in the attack. He married a female black servant while working on the farm.

When Anthony was released he was legally recognized as a “free Negro” and ran a successful farm. In 1651 he held 250 acres and five black indentured servants. In 1654, it was time for Anthony to release John Casor, a black indentured servant. Instead Anthony told Casor he was extending his time. Casor left and became employed by the free white man Robert Parker.

Anthony Johnson sued Robert Parker in the Northampton Court in 1654. In 1655, the court ruled that Anthony Johnson could hold John Casor indefinitely. The court gave judicial sanction for blacksto own slave of their own race. Thus Casor became the first permanent slave and Johnson the first slave owner.

Whites still could not legally hold a black servant as an indefinite slave until 1670.
Wrong.
In that year, the colonial assembly passed legislation permitting free whites, blacks, and Indians the right to own blacks as slaves.

By 1699, the number of free blacks prompted fears of a “Negro insurrection.” Virginia Colonial ordered the repatriation of freed blacks back to Africa. Many blacks sold themselves to white masters so they would not have to go to Africa. This was the first effort to gently repatriate free blacks back to Africa. The modern nations of Sierra Leone and Liberia both originated as colonies of repatriated former black slaves.

However, black slave owners continued to thrive in the United States.

By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. By 1860 there were about 3,000 slaves owned by black households in the city of New Orleans alone.

Sources:
John Casor
Anthony Johnson
http://www.mythdebunk.com/first-slave-owner-african-american/

Whereas Hugh Gwyn hath by order from this Board Brought back from Maryland three servants formerly run away from the said Gwyn, the court doth therefore order that the said three servants shall receive the punishment of whipping and to have thirty stripes apiece one called Victor, a dutchman, the other a Scotchman called James Gregory, shall first serve out their times with their master according to their Indentures, and one whole year apiece after the time of their service is Expired. By their said Indentures in recompense of his Loss sustained by their absence and after that service to their said master is Expired to serve the colony for three whole years apiece, and that the third being a negro named John Punch shall serve his said master or his assigns for the time of his natural Life here or elsewhere.
General Court, Dominion and Colony of Virginia, July 9, 1640.
 
Back
Top