Report: Obama Wants To Become UN Secretary General, Netanyahu Doing Everything He Can

[FGB]

Report: Obama Wants To Become UN Secretary General, Netanyahu Doing Everything He Can To Stop Him.

OH HELL NO!

It seems President Obama has no intention of stepping out of the White House and fading from the limelight. No, he’s got his sights set on the world stage—this time as secretary general of the United Nations, according to Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Jarida.

But not all world leaders are keen to see this come to fruition, including first and foremost, Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu.



MORE... http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/01/1...al-netanyahu-doing-everything-he-can-stop-him

 

[BotanyBoy]

Who cares? UN ain't shit....all they do is write letters to assholes telling them how upset they are about the asshole being an asshole.

That's it.....tits in a fuckin' boar. Fantastic place for Obama.

 

[sr71plt]

Another dumb Fox News fabrication. Beyond the first temporary UNSG until one could be elected, there have been no SGs from the permanent five--and likely never will be.

 

[urguyscott]

Hell he'll screw up the U.N. even worst than he did the U. S. The man has no idea how to lead. The only office he is qualified to hold is as a corrupt Chicago Alderman and even that he would screw up. Look at the mess Chicago is in with his bro running it. Obama was not made president because of his leadership but was picked because he doesn't have any by the guys in the back cigar filled room. They needed an Uncle Tom they could use as a figure head. Like the fool that use to be president of Iran who was just a figure head, Obama has also taken himself too serious and really believes the b.s. his puppet masters have told him. If he gets out of hand he will be sent back to the poppy fields like the little guy in Iran was. Hell give him the U.N. and he'll destroy it and we will be finished with that terror rubber stamp outfit.

 

[urguyscott]

Another dumb Fox News fabrication. Beyond the first temporary UNSG until one could be elected, there have been no SGs from the permanent five--and likely never will be.

By the way this is correct. The SGs can not be from the permanent five, but if it means sending the world back into the dark ages, I'm sure they will find a way.

 

[Wrong Element]

There's an unwritten rule that Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America take turns. It's Europe's turn next.

 

[sr71plt]

In other words, this whole "let's hate on Obama" topic is a bunch of crap, right?

 

[Sean Renaud]

By the way this is correct. The SGs can not be from the permanent five, but if it means sending the world back into the dark ages, I'm sure they will find a way.

Because Obama would be a step back to the Dark Ages. Seriously, don't be dumb.

 

[sr71plt]

In other words, this whole "let's hate on Obama" topic is a bunch of crap, right?

 

[Sean Renaud]

It always was and it's hilarious.

 

[Hypoxia]

Mr Obama is yet another corporate whore and that's a valid reason to despise him. But the usual fucktards find it necessary to invent bogus crap to focus their hatred. As a group, they're an excellent sales opportunity -- they'll buy anything, same as Mormon converts.

 

[phrodeau]

By the way this is correct. The SGs can not be from the permanent five, but if it means sending the world back into the dark ages, I'm sure they will find a way.

There's an unwritten rule that Europe, Asia, Africa, and South America take turns. It's Europe's turn next.

Since Obama is a Kenyan with nothing to do with America, he could snag it.

 

[lovecraft68]

I think Obama is testing to see if the entire world is as stupid as America and would elect him to that position.

 

[Sean Renaud]

America wasn't stupid to elect him. We were stupid not to give him a larger congressional backing/to trust Republicans to have some sense of honor.

The world could do worse than Obama but really we all know he's gonna go home and do basically nothing just like most presidents.

 

[sr71plt]

Drank Fox New's Kool-Aid, I see. LC. There's no evidence Obama has said a damn thing about becoming UN Sec General, not to mention that he's smart enough (unlike some posters to this thread) to know it wouldn't happen.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Is there any GOOD reason why it wouldn't if he wanted aside from apparent tradition? I mean has anybody of his stature (Head of State) even made a serious bid?

 

[sr71plt]

Is there any GOOD reason why it wouldn't if he wanted aside from apparent tradition? I mean has anybody of his stature (Head of State) even made a serious bid?

Yes, of course, there's a reason. It's the way the UN is set up. It would completely throw the balance of the organization out of whack to give that position to someone from the five permanent members. One of the other permanent members would veto the appointment if it got that far, which it wouldn't. Apparently knowledge of the UN doesn't run deep on this thread (or at Fox News).

 

[Sean Renaud]

Yes, of course, there's a reason. It's the way the UN is set up. It would completely throw the balance of the organization out of whack to give that position to someone from the five permanent members. One of the other permanent members would veto the appointment if it got that far, which it wouldn't. Apparently knowledge of the UN doesn't run deep on this thread (or at Fox News).

Thats why I ask questions, but that doesn't sound like a legal reason so much as a political reason.

 

[sr71plt]

Thats why I ask questions, but that doesn't sound like a legal reason so much as a political reason.

The UN isn't a legal body; it's a political one. And the whole questioning of this seems really naive and dumb to me. But this is the Internet.

 

[Sean Renaud]

The UN isn't a legal body; it's a political one. And the whole questioning of this seems really naive and dumb to me. But this is the Internet.

I'm sure the UN has a list of official rules that may as well be "laws". Basically your answer is "Obama couldn't win." Which I have no doubt is true, not "Obama is ineligible" because of a specific rule.

 

[sr71plt]

I'm sure the UN has a list of official rules that may as well be "laws". Basically your answer is "Obama couldn't win." Which I have no doubt is true, not "Obama is ineligible" because of a specific rule.

No. My answer is that they don't pick a Secretary General from the ranks of the five permanent members and if one were put forward the other permanent members would veto the selection (as Waldheim's reappointment was vetoed by China--not that Waldheim was from the permanent five; rather that it only takes one permanent member's no vote to spike an appointment).

I really can't understand why you can't see this and I don't see why you are being this naive. I think you're being as obtuse about it as Fox News was.

This whole thread is based on stupid Fox News propagandizing. This pretty much reflects why the Political forum here is such a lame backwater.

 

[Sean Renaud]

That's a political reason not a legal reason. What is complicated?

 

[sr71plt]

That's a political reason not a legal reason. What is complicated?

What part of the UN is a political, not a legal organization can't you understand? Sorry, you're being insufferable--and really, really obtuse--about this. So, I'm giving up on your ability to comprehend.

Bottom line. No other permanent UN Security Council member is going to let another permanent UN Security Council member have both a veto vote and the Secretary General post. Just how naive are you?

 

[Sean Renaud]

What part of the UN is a political, not a legal organization can't you understand? Sorry, you're being insufferable--and really, really obtuse--about this. So, I'm giving up on your ability to comprehend.

Would you consider the NFL a legal organization?

 

[sr71plt]

The NFL has nothing to do with the UN. Again, how naive and provincial can you be? Nope, it's starting into how stupid can you be?