Militia takes over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters in Oregon

I'll make you the same deal I offered that coward veteman...

We can both put $1000 in escrow with a neutral 3rd party on here, and then show them proof of ownership of all of my properties, and show them current bank account statements, and proof of other assets.

You do the same, and if you have more than me, the money is yours... if not, the money is mine.

I already know how you'll handle this, but I'm calling you out anyways.

oh pumpkin, make it someone of meaning. $1,000 is chump change but then again you are a street thug while your down low buddy Izzy is a racist asshole
 
So these treasonous, seditious terrorists are still there then?
 
So you're accepting my challenge then?


pumpking, who are you and what are you? why should I care? you are one of the obama kind ... don't even register in my mind. What do I have to prove? What will the end result be? You will still be sucking down the welfare ... and I doubt you can come up with a piddly $1k
 
pumpking, who are you and what are you? why should I care? you are one of the obama kind ... don't even register in my mind. What do I have to prove? What will the end result be? You will still be sucking down the welfare ... and I doubt you can come up with a piddly $1k

Are you accepting my challenge?
 
So these treasonous, seditious terrorists are still there then?

For now.

Lots of lists of five things to know circulating. I think this one is particularly useful:

Spencer Sunshine said:
1. It’s actually a land grab — with guns
Despite the talk about supporting the Hammond family in Burns, Oregon, the takeover of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters is actually part of a long-standing campaign by radical right-wingers to dismantle federal land ownership in the West. Some elected officials are working through mainstream channels to get lands transferred to state or county governments, or to allow them equal say over their use. But the Malheur takeover seems to be an attempt to spread a tactic of armed federal land takeovers. These armed groups are part of the “Patriot movement”—the successor to the 1990s militia movement—which has seen a rebirth since the election of Barack Obama in 2008.

2. The paramilitaries are powered by conspiracy theories
“Agenda 21” was denounced in at least one sign at the march in Burns that preceded the takeover. Agenda 21 is a non-binding UN resolution recommending sustainable ecological development. But it’s been turned into a conspiracy theory by the right, which sees a sinister global socialist agenda in things as small as building a local park. Patriot movement activists don’t see what’s happening to Dwight and Steven Hammond as an unusual-but-unfair legal case. Instead, they are portraying it as part of a socialist agenda to seize rural private land and drive predominantly white farmers into the cities. There, they believe the government will detain right-wing activists, seize privately held guns, turn the cities into concentration camps, and allow the UN (or China) to invade.

3. The ‘Patriot’ movement is a child of the White Power movement
Many of the tactics and talking points being used were popularized in the 1970s by the white supremacist group Posse Comitatus. This group promoted the “Christian Patriot” movement, advocated the formation of “Citizens Militias,” helped forge an idiosyncratic reading of the Constitution, said the county sheriff was the highest elected official that should be obeyed, and opposed federal environmental restrictions.

Over the years, these ideas took on a life of their own, even though few of the activists using these ideas today are ideological white supremacists. For example, they still try to recruit county sheriffs; the sheriff in Harney County (where Burns is located) was asked to provide sanctuary for the Hammonds from the federal government. He refused.

Activists such as Cliven Bundy’s son, Ammon Bundy (who is leading the Malheur occupation), claim that what is happening to the Hammonds is unconstitutional. This view of the Constitution is based on a position promoted by Posse Comitatus. They held that the Constitution could be interpreted by individual right-wing activists in a way that allowed them to have more jurisdiction than federal courts do. The Sovereign Citizens are the best-known movement that promotes these crank legal theories today. For example, Pete Santilli, who livestreamed the Burns march and went to the Malheur takeover, promotes these ideas.

4. Federal government policies have allowed this situation to happen
Although there is no written federal rule that is publicly known, those who study the radical right largely believe that the federal government has a policy not to directly confront armed right-wing groups. The disastrous handling of the Waco and Ruby Ridge sieges in the early 1990s apparently convinced the feds to take a softer approach. This seemed to have paid off when the Sovereign Citizens at the “Justus Township” surrendered peacefully in 1996. But after 9/11, even as the feds have cracked down hard on all kinds of radical political activity (for example, many eco-saboteurs who never killed or injured anyone were sentenced under terrorism laws), the radical right has received almost a complete pass.

The April 2014 standoff at Cliven Bundy’s Nevada ranch—when Patriot movement activists came to the aid of a radical right-wing rancher who refused to pay his fees for grazing on public land and trained rifles on federal agents—was taken as a green light for similar actions. The federal government has not prosecuted Cliven Bundy or his allies for anything that happened there. This has apparently convinced the Bundy family (three of whom reportedly are at Malheur) that the feds will acquiesce to armed takeovers.

5. There is widespread opposition to the Malheur takeover
The takeover attempt is not popular with many in Oregon. When a convoy of Patriot movement activists heading to Burns left from Bend, Oregon on Saturday, they were met with counter-protesters from the community. In Burns, many in the town have objected to the presence of the “Bundy militia.”

The Patriot movement groups are aware of this. A number of Patriot movement activists denounced any support of the Hammonds beforehand. The Oath Keepers, a national group, refused to come to the march, saying the Hammonds had not asked for help. Furthermore, the group said that Oregon members who helped organize the protest would be reprimanded. And, although details are not known, it appears that the vast majority of activists who are taking over Malheur are largely out-of-staters from Nevada and Arizona. While they hope to rally widespread support, that doesn’t seem to be happening.

Additional links available through the main article.
 
So these treasonous, seditious terrorists are still there then?

You'd think your progressive kin in the Oval Office - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful man in the world - would've already put an end to it, right seaniepoo?

You reckon he'll finally find the nuts to put boots-on-the-ground somewhere?

:D

Oh, the righteous irony...
 
I bet at least one of these guys has a "cold dead hands" bumper sticker. I bet all of them have anti-Obama ones.
None of them thought far enough ahead to realize they're going against the most powerful military the planet has ever known. Bunch of idiots. Last I heard they don't even have the backing of the guys they're supposedly doing this for.
 
So you're bowing out then?

That's exactly what I figured you'd do.


again, your little thug behavior doesn't impress me. Be the "man" and own your challenge otherwise you are still just a little bitch with Izzy taking you from behind on the Down low
 
again, your little thug behavior doesn't impress me. Be the "man" and own your challenge otherwise you are still just a little bitch with Izzy taking you from behind on the Down low

I'll ask you one more time.

Are you accepting my challenge?

If you don't answer with a "yes" in your next response to me, I will take that as refusal to show and prove and accept your failure as proof that you have no money, no job, and no assets.
 
I'll ask you one more time.

Are you accepting my challenge?

If you don't answer with a "yes" in your next response to me, I will take that as refusal to show and prove and accept your failure as proof that you have no money, no job, and no assets.



Still threatened ... so sorry that you suffer from being a weak little person. Clearly, I hit a nerve and under that porcelain skin. Didn't realize what a cupcake you were. Did you cry a little?

Maybe I should apologize for deflating that pompous empty ego of yours?

sorry that you have no assets. a clear sign of a bullshit artist. but please carry on
 
Still threatened ... so sorry that you suffer from being a weak little person. Clearly, I hit a nerve and under that porcelain skin. Didn't realize what a cupcake you were. Did you cry a little?

Maybe I should apologize for deflating that pompous empty ego of yours?

Your defeat is accepted.
 
I'll ask you one more time.

Are you accepting my challenge?

If you don't answer with a "yes" in your next response to me, I will take that as refusal to show and prove and accept your failure as proof that you have no money, no job, and no assets.

:D

Has it feel, dick, to so desperately need to measure your alleged penis against jen's nonexistent one?
 
Did the daycare let out early?

If you're referring to the ongoing waterfall of regurgitate being vomited by the skipping needle trollbot who just found its second life in this thread, I think you meant to say "Bellevue."

http://38.media.tumblr.com/89f73abceef0f9283ab72d9aefe2f432/tumblr_mkfq4mvnzm1qgf1i8o1_500.gif

:D

Has it feel, dick, to so desperately need to measure your alleged penis against jen's nonexistent one?

:D

How does it feel, dick, to so desperately need to measure your alleged penis against jen's nonexistent one?

Fixed your post, Flameout. Happy New Year! :)
 
If you're referring to the ongoing waterfall of regurgitate being vomited by the skipping needle trollbot who just found its second life in this thread, I think you meant to say "Bellevue."

No idea what any of that meant.
I was referring to two people who are supposed to be adults trying to one-up each other over how much money they have. It's childish, stupid and pointless.
 
No idea what any of that meant.
I was referring to two people who are supposed to be adults trying to one-up each other over how much money they have. It's childish, stupid and pointless.

Only one of the two you are referring to is an adult and can be called a person.

The other entity that posted within two minutes of me after over an hour of inactivity in this thread is a shitty trollbot just squawking for distraction, much like the earlier piss-stank shitstain who went through his whole bank of crap memes just to talk shit about black people again.

If you decide to stick around these parts during this election year, you'll get to know their unique stench quite intimately. ;)
 
Back
Top