VaticanAssassin
God Mod
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2011
- Posts
- 12,391
They are occupying a peice of land in the middle of nowhere.
They are armed.
Your term of armed insurrection is disingenuous at best....
Militia takes over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters in Oregon
- Thread starter Ulaven_Demorte
- Start date
They are occupying a peice of land in the middle of nowhere.
They are armed.
Your term of armed insurrection is disingenuous at best....
VaticanAssassin
God Mod
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2011
- Posts
- 12,391
If they burn down stores, loot, or assault people I will be the first person to argues they need to be removed.
You race baiting retard with pretend degrees
Sean
We'll see.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2005
- Posts
- 96,193
Ah. Can you give us the distance from a habitation where it becomes unacceptable to commit treason?
Sean
We'll see.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2005
- Posts
- 96,193
I don't think any race baiting is necessary when it comes to you or your impotent old man. The apple certainly didn't fall far from that tree.
VaticanAssassin
God Mod
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2011
- Posts
- 12,391
Under your definition of treason, occupy Wall Street and the Ferguson demonstrations would be treason...
It's ok. We know you are retarded.
Why do Coloreds bitch about shit 300 yrs ago
Why did Hussein Obama Bin Soetoro talk about the Crusades
Sean
We'll see.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2005
- Posts
- 96,193
I wasn't aware that the occupy people staged an armed takeover of a federal building. Got a link?
VaticanAssassin
God Mod
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2011
- Posts
- 12,391
As soon as you show me it was a armed takeover you fucking retard.
Queersetti
Bastardo Suave
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2003
- Posts
- 37,288
Armed men have seized federal property and announced that they intend to occupy it until their demands are met.
If that doesn't fit the definition of insurrection, nothing does.
Looting is illegal, among other things
The State is an open carry State,
Nothing they are going is illegal, notwithstanding your inept Gaze at the matter
SgtSpiderMan
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Posts
- 28,086
Is it legal to bring guns into a federal building? Still waiting on the answer.
What part of open carry do you have an issue with
SgtSpiderMan
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Posts
- 28,086
Hey, Vat. While you're putting up links could you throw up a link to those several law schools you mentioned who said it was legal to boot out Muslims? Appreciate it, dude.
Queersetti
Bastardo Suave
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2003
- Posts
- 37,288
Thanks for the info. If you don't hear from me in the next few hours, it's because I decided I could pack my stuff and go move into the post office.
SgtSpiderMan
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Posts
- 28,086
Which is why I'm asking again. You posted a state law, this is a federal building.
I'll wait.
Queersetti
Bastardo Suave
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2003
- Posts
- 37,288
All of it, actually.
Sean
We'll see.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2005
- Posts
- 96,193
What? You really are floundering now, Barney.
Well then, work to overturn the law
I will trade that law for overturning
Voting rights for Coloreds n Cunts
Enjoy Gazing at em
VaticanAssassin
God Mod
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2011
- Posts
- 12,391
State laws govern gun rules in national forests so the state law is indeed relevant.
You do understand this is a not a court house?
First, the primary laws governing possession of firearms and other weapons on National Forest are State Laws. These laws were developed by the states following establishment of our Cooperative Wildlife Management Agreements
Last edited:
Brollyanna
Doo-wop thou wilt.
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2013
- Posts
- 1,479
I think men are cute and stuff, but giving them the right to vote? That was taking it a step too far...
Sean
We'll see.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2005
- Posts
- 96,193
Cased Gun Laws: As the name implies, this law requires that all firearms on National
Forest be unloaded and kept in a case. Virginia and West Virginia have similar “cased
gun laws”. In order to allow hunting, these laws make an exception.
• It is legal to have loaded firearms on National Forest during the authorized
general firearms and muzzle loading gun seasons for bear, deer, grouse, pheasant,
quail, rabbit, raccoon, squirrel, turkey, or waterfowl. This exception is very
specific and applies only during the period when it is legal to take these listed
species and doesn’t include carrying the loaded weapons in a vehicle.
• Because hunting on Sunday is prohibited, carrying a loaded gun on National
Forest is not legal on Sunday even if it is the Sunday in the middle of the general
firearms deer season.
• The second exception to this law allows people with a concealed weapon permit
to carry a loaded, concealed, handgun either on their person or in their vehicle
while on National Forest. This does not apply if the person is engaged in a
primitive weapons season or chase only season.
• People muzzle loading or bow hunting may carry a concealed weapon as long as
they possess a concealed weapon permit.
Sean
We'll see.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2005
- Posts
- 96,193
Why did you cut your quote off at that point, Barney?
JawnKarTurr
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2013
- Posts
- 1,312
Wow loving some of these comments. I guess you can say this because they're white Americans. They had a protest, occupied a building, and what destroyed the town? Looted and fired on police officers? Oh right they didn't. I guess they don't know how to do a "protest" like the good people of Ferguson (which btw "right-wing militia types" protected buildings and citizens of different races during the first riot) and the good people of Baltimore to name a few.
I don't deny violence has been used by some like when that insane criminal couple murdered the two offices in Las Vegas. Well does the murder of police officers offend liberals any more? Well anyway everyone forgets that they were kicked off the Bundy Ranch by the Oath Keepers and others. Never mind they were confronted by a brave concealed carry holsters who died when he tries to take them alive (a mistake that could easily been made by a police officer).
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter is something I've heard a lot over the last decade. Normally from people who are trying to justify 9-11 and other acts by Islamic terrorists. The thing is they're fighting for repression not freedom. In the case of these people they're fighting for less government in their lives....freedom.
So be Americans and fight for freedom in the jury box, with the ballet box, and at last resort the cartridge box.
I know for some of you the principals don't apply though. If it had been a left wing group you'd be screaming about them getting lawyers, police brutality, and the evils of repression. Instead I'm reading about fools wanting to shoot them and throw them in jail without trial....Probably the same people who don't want that for our worst enemies.
Let's concern ourselves with the facts. Definitions after all fit lot's of things. l know a man I admire for many things Martin Luther King could easily and correctly be labelled an insurgent by definition.
Also many people are pointing to state run militia groups and saying these groups can't be legitimate. Well afraid not because the Founders also had disorganized groups in mind as well. A person fighting for their country doesn't have to part of an official group. I imagine that's why they wanted everyone or rather the people to have the right to defend themselves.
I don't deny violence has been used by some like when that insane criminal couple murdered the two offices in Las Vegas. Well does the murder of police officers offend liberals any more? Well anyway everyone forgets that they were kicked off the Bundy Ranch by the Oath Keepers and others. Never mind they were confronted by a brave concealed carry holsters who died when he tries to take them alive (a mistake that could easily been made by a police officer).
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter is something I've heard a lot over the last decade. Normally from people who are trying to justify 9-11 and other acts by Islamic terrorists. The thing is they're fighting for repression not freedom. In the case of these people they're fighting for less government in their lives....freedom.
So be Americans and fight for freedom in the jury box, with the ballet box, and at last resort the cartridge box.
I know for some of you the principals don't apply though. If it had been a left wing group you'd be screaming about them getting lawyers, police brutality, and the evils of repression. Instead I'm reading about fools wanting to shoot them and throw them in jail without trial....Probably the same people who don't want that for our worst enemies.
Let's concern ourselves with the facts. Definitions after all fit lot's of things. l know a man I admire for many things Martin Luther King could easily and correctly be labelled an insurgent by definition.
Also many people are pointing to state run militia groups and saying these groups can't be legitimate. Well afraid not because the Founders also had disorganized groups in mind as well. A person fighting for their country doesn't have to part of an official group. I imagine that's why they wanted everyone or rather the people to have the right to defend themselves.
Similar threads
