the hateful eight

[cleaver]

Actually, the beneficiary of my first "Christian" exorcism treated me to a $3.50 matinee showing of Bridge of Spies a month or so ago, which was an excellent film, except for the comic book portrayal of Powers being missiled down.

Tarantino, for one, is so gratuitous with his continuous comic book portrayals of violence that he juvenilely insults any viewer who's ever actually had empirical relations with violence itself irl.

It seems his prime market are those who'll never tire of the next Star Wars episode, and who spend inordinate amounts of time enjoying watching TV, movies, and playing whatever digital games so many emotionally-retarded adults spend so much time playing these days.

Thus, I do not find it strange that he is a favorite of the GB progressive tribe.

without a doubt,
in your mind,
you are correct.

and as such,
the history channel
and national geographics
as a standard
are your right man's burden.

emotional retardation is certainly relative, really,
i find your above to be...

rather reflective.

no offense, truly.

don't see the film.
don't bother yourself with the frustration of trying to school the unrighteous.
save yourself the aggravation...
and honestly,
reserve from yourself
the further embarrassment of
exhibiting your
emotional...

self reflections

i enjoyed the movie and the work of the filmmaker
as well as the vibrancy
in 'new' grand film-making
that is
not never meant to be real...

btw?
how do you know
just what was going on when gary powers was shot down?
or how it should be...
dramatically
related to...
those who weren't actually there ?

really, just what the fuck are movies supposed to be?

you have averred above
that those not you in this are:
unsophisticated audiences
sheltered from violence
lemmings
force fed media and content
and (god forbid)
progressive...

before that you suggested that i was a fluffer

i'm gladdened
that my world can be challenged still
by the creative disturbance
that is a tarantino effort...

instead of being...
simply challenged

 

[Disgustipated]

Actually, the beneficiary of my first "Christian" exorcism treated me to a $3.50 matinee showing of Bridge of Spies a month or so ago, which was an excellent film, except for the comic book portrayal of Powers being missiled down.

Tarantino, for one, is so gratuitous with his continuous comic book portrayals of violence that he juvenilely insults any viewer who's ever actually had empirical relations with violence itself irl.

It seems his prime market are those who'll never tire of the next Star Wars episode, and who spend inordinate amounts of time enjoying watching TV, movies, and playing whatever digital games so many emotionally-retarded adults spend so much time playing these days.

Thus, I do not find it strange that he is a favorite of the GB progressive tribe.

So after not liking two of his previous films, you're gonna pass judgment on the the flick as well as critiques of those who have actually seen he film?
That is some Grade A SadDonkey manure right there, folks.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

So after not liking two of his previous films, you're gonna pass judgment on the the flick as well as critiques of those who have actually seen he film?
That is some Grade A SadDonkey manure right there, folks.

The only thing less lame than eyer's posts is you following him around calling him lame.

 

[allateup]

without a doubt,
in your mind,
you are correct.

and as such,
the history channel
and national geographics
as a standard
are your right man's burden.

emotional retardation is certainly relative, really,
i find your above to be...

rather reflective.

no offense, truly.

don't see the film.
don't bother yourself with the frustration of trying to school the unrighteous.
save yourself the aggravation...
and honestly,
reserve from yourself
the further embarrassment of
exhibiting your
emotional...

self reflections

i enjoyed the movie and the work of the filmmaker
as well as the vibrancy
in 'new' grand film-making
that is
not never meant to be real...

btw?
how do you know
just what was going on when gary powers was shot down?
or how it should be...
dramatically
related to...
those who weren't actually there ?

really, just what the fuck are movies supposed to be?

you have averred above
that those not you in this are:
unsophisticated audiences
sheltered from violence
lemmings
force fed media and content
and (god forbid)
progressive...

before that you suggested that i was a fluffer

i'm gladdened
that my world can be challenged still
by the creative disturbance
that is a tarantino effort...

instead of being...
simply challenged

http://sieuthimyphammini.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Chapstick1.jpg

 

[cleaver]

http://sieuthimyphammini.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Chapstick1.jpg

now that
is actually humorous
on several levels

clever,
in a delightful,
squirm-in-your-chair and wait for a response
kind of way
for you...
(which is creepy to visualize, much less in knowing that it is most likely true)

and funny
in that
the retort was actually
twice-a-day-dead-clock spot-on good...

thirdly, and most hilariously ironic
is that you haven't seen the film
which...
any more in this would be spoiler.

nonetheless,
hee haw, sam wainwright!

2 points - huff-n-puff