It's war stupid! Pt. 2

Ishmael

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Posts
84,005
Yes, a second thread on the subject. The reason is that by the time a thread gets to the 4th page it's generally been sidetracked off onto peripheral issues. That's an observation, not a bitch. It's the way things are and have always been, no matter what the subject or which forum. Hell, even some of the pix threads lose focus.

My thesis was/is that we're at war with all of Islam. Here's my case;

The Philosophy:

No matter where you look, everywhere you find Muslims you find problems. Acts of terrorism have been enacted on every continent on the planet save one, Antarctica. Where they are not murdering infidels and barbarians they are murdering each other, all in the name of Allah. In Europe Muslim men are responsible for such a high percentage of sexual assaults and rapes that the various nations stopped reporting the religion of the offenders back in the 2001-3 time frame. The Qu'ran teaches a political philosophy that is immiscible with any form of Western Democracy and immiscible with any form of secular law. Even the so called 'moderate' Muslims disapprove of both. Google "terrorist organizations" and look at the list. Out of an astonishingly long list only a handful are NOT Islamic. And most of those that aren't are communist organizations that haven't seemed to have gotten the news yet.

The Recruiting Issue - AKA "Blame the Victim";

We are told that if we say this or do that we are aiding in the recruitment of radicals. Trump, Gitmo, Obama, Clinton, killing this leader or that Imam (all preachers of hate). What an absolute crock of bullshit.

In the 1990's the US Dept. of Transportation ran a PSA campaign, "Don't Let a Good Kid Go Bad." It didn't run long. Back then the citizenry hadn't come down with brain atrophy. The DOT was so swamped with letters and calls of outrage that they pulled the program. The entire premise of the program was that it was the victims fault for the criminal behavior.

Here on Lit. the subject of rape comes up from time to time and anyone that intimates that the victim "asked for it" is taken to the mat and rightly so.

But here we have senior elected officials telling us that it is OUR fault that the Muslims become so enraged over segments of public discussion that such discussion should be forever banned. Intimating that we, the victims, are at fault for their murderous behavior. That the smallest offense to their sensibilities is enough to make "a good Muslim go bad." And the most amazing part is the shear number of the population that is swallowing that bilge. Has it taken only one generation for us to have lost our ability to reason?

It's truly a case of the inmates running the asylum. They, along with some truly moronic elected officials, are using the threat of 'making a good Muslim go bad' to silence us, to force us to submit to their will. To control the conversation by silencing the opposition. Just because they're murderous thugs doesn't mean they don't know what they're doing. And we're sheepishly allowing them to do it.

It's the Religion:

Read the Qu'ran, read the Haddiths, those book say what they say. Even casual reading leaves no doubt that it is the religion itself teaching and promoting their murderous behavior. There are no major mistakes in the translations, as some apologists would have us believe. The Muslim takes the Qu'ran as the literal word of God. Each and every word are believed to have come from God's big book in the sky. There can be no figurative interpretation of the writings. Even in those instances where God seems to contradict Himself, well, that's just the way it is and God is perfect and we're just silly mortals that fail to understand. It is the core books of the religion that are the recruiting tools. Everything else is just used as an example of how far the object of their murderous intent has strayed from the word of God. The examples are merely supportive evidence at best, not the reason.

It's only the few:

The "few" happen to be 160,000,000 strong with 640,000,000 in support of their goals. Do those number look like 'a few' to anyone here? You notice that the apologists NEVER cite the numbers, only the percentages. The percentages look/sound so much smaller than the reality. If you are buying into the "it's only a few" mantra, I hope you feel comfortable in your 'percentage cocoon.'

Make no mistake, we are at war with Islam, even if we refuse to acknowledge it. They are under no such illusion. We are at war with Islam because it's virtually impossible to separate the fundamentalist from the moderate until after the fact. If we could neatly separate into their own buckets then things might be different, but we can't and they aren't.

Ishmael
 
Why wait until the 4th page? I say we sidetrack this thread immediately.

:rose:
 
Why wait until the 4th page? I say we sidetrack this thread immediately.

:rose:

Or just let it die the natural death it deserves. He hasn't said one thing different that he hasn't said before and that hasn't been addressed in detail.

Nothing to see here. Literally.
 
Why wait until the 4th page? I say we sidetrack this thread immediately.

:rose:

I always thought this multiple-panel comic illustration was interesting...I think it's titled "Evolution Of Man."

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_jhf-7wU76qc/TBIiDqPGOhI/AAAAAAAAAeQ/9sWssrROTm0/s1600/evolutionofman-pic.jpg

Don't know exactly who drew it, it looks like Milo Manara's style...but what's interesting is that it depicts that no matter what era we existed in, war (and death) is the only constant, followed by sex.
 
Please, please people. This topic is WAHR STUPID!

Code:
[B][FONT="Franklin Gothic Medium"][SIZE="6"][COLOR="Red"]War and Peace [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/B]



BY LEO TOLSTOY 



Translated b\ LOUISE and AYLMER MAUDE 




WILLIAM BENTON, Publisher 



ENCYCLOPEDIA BR1TANNICA, INC. 



CHICAGO - LONDON - TORONTO 



BY ARRANGEMENT WITH OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 



COPYRIGHT IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1952, 
BY ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA,INC. 

COPYRIGHT 1952. COPYRIGHT UNDER INTERNATIONAL COPYRIG^ 
ENCYCLOP *:DIA BRITANNICA, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED UNDER 
COPYRIGHT CONVENTIONS BY ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANJ^ 



BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE 
LEO TOLSTOY, 18281910 



COUNT LEO NIKOLAYEVICH TOLSTOY was born 
August 28, 1828, at the family estate of Yasna- 
ya Polyana, in the province of Tula. His moth- 
er died when he was three and his father six 
years later. Placed in the care of his aunts, he 
passed many of his early years at Kazan, where, 
in 1844, after a preliminary training by French 
tutors, he entered the university. He cared lit- 
tle for the university and in 1847 withdrew be- 
cause of "ill-health and domestic circum- 
stances." He had, however, done a great deal 
of reading, of French, English, and Russian 
novels, the New Testament, Voltaire, and 
Hegel. The author exercising the greatest in- 
fluence upon him at this time was Rousseau; 
he read his complete works and for sometime 
wore about his neck a medallion of Rousseau. 

Immediately upon leaving the university, 
Tolstoy returned to his estate and, perhaps inr 
spired by his enthusiasm for Rousseau, pre- 
pared to devote himself to agriculture and to 
improving the condition of his serfs. His first 
attempt at social reform proved disappointing, 
and after six months he withdrew to Moscow 
and St. Petersburg, where he gave himself over 
to the irregular life characteristic of his class 
and time. In 1851, determined to "escape my 
debts and, more than anything else, my hab- 
its," he enlisted in the Army as a gentleman- 
volunteer, and went to the Caucasus. While at 
Tiflis, preparing for his examinations as a 
cadet, he wrote the first portion of the trilogy, 
Childhood, Boyhood, and Youth, in which he 
celebrated the happiness of "being with Na- 
ture, seeing her, communing with her." He al- 
so began The Cossacks with the intention of 
showing that culture is the enemy of happi- 
ness. Although continuing his army life, he 
gradually came to realize that "a military ca- 
reer is not for me, and the sooner I get out of 
it and devote myself entirely to literature the 
better." His Sevastopol Sketches (1855) were 
so successful that Czar Nicholas issued special 
orders that he should be removed from a post 
of danger. 

Returning to St. Petersburg, Tolstoy was re- 
ceived with great favor in both the official and 
literary circles of the capital. He soon became 



interested in the popular progressive move- 
ment of the time, and in 1857 he decided to go 
abroad and study the educational and munici- 
pal systems of other countries. That year, and 
again in 1860, he traveled in Europe. At Yas- 
naya Polyana in 1861 he liberated his serfs and 
opened a school, established on the principle 
that "everything which savours of compulsion 
is harmful." He started a magazine to promote 
his notions on education and at the same time 
served as an official arbitrator for grievances 
between the nobles and the recently emanci- 
pated serfs. By the end of 1863 he was so ex- 
hausted that he discontinued his activities and 
retired to the steppes to drink koumis for his 
health. 

Tolstoy had been contemplating marriage 
for some time, and in 1862 he married Sophie 
Behrs, sixteen years his junior, and the daugh- 
ter of a fashionable Moscow doctor. Their 
early married life at Yasnaya Polyana was 
tranquil. Family cares occupied the Countess, 
and in the course of her life she bore thirteen 
children, nine of whom survived infancy. Yet 
she also acted as a copyist for her husband, 
who after their marriage turned again to writ- 
ing. He was soon at work upon "a novel of 
the i8io's and *2o's" which absorbed all his 
time and effort. He went frequently to Mos- 
cow, "studying letters, diaries, and traditions" 
and "accumulated a whole library" of histori- 
cal material on the period. He interviewed 
survivors of the battles of that time and trav- 
eled to Borodino to draw up a map of the 
battleground. Finally, in 1869, after his work 
had undergone several changes in conception 
and he had "spent five years of uninterrupted 
andjgxceptionally strenuous labor Tnnierthe 
IbesfcondUtions of life/' he published War and 
Peace. Its appearance immediately established 
Tolstoy's reputation, and in the judgment of 
Turgenev, the acknowledged dean of Russian 
letters, gave him "first place among all our 
contemporary writers." 

The years immediately following the com- 
pletion of War and Peace were pa**efl in a 
great variety of occupations, none of which 
Tohtoy found satisfying. He tried busying 



VI 



BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE 



himself with the affairs of his estate, under- 
took the learning of Greek to read the ancient 
classics, turned again to education, wrote a 
series of elementary school books, and served 
as school inspector. With much urging from 
his wife and friends, he completed Anna Kare- 
nina, which appeared serially between 1875 
and 1877. Disturbed by what he considered his 
unreflective and prosperous existence, Tolstoy 
became increasingly interested in religion. At 
first he turned to the orthodox faith of the 
people. Unable to find rest there, he began a 
detailed examination of religions, and out of 
his reading, particularly of the Gospels, gradu- 
ally evolved his own personal doctrine. 

Following his conversion, Tolstoy adopted 
a new mode of life. He dressed like a peasant, 
devoted much of his time to manual work, 
learned shoemaking, and followed a vegetari- 
an diet. With the exception of his youngest 
daughter, Alexandra, Tolstoy's family re- 
mained hostile to his teaching. The breach be- 
tween him and his wife grew steadily wider. 
In 1879 he wrote the Kreutzer Sonata in which 
he attacked the normal state of marriage and 
extolled a life of celibacy and chastity. In 1881 
he divided his estate among his heirs and, a 
few years later, despite the opposition of his 
wife, announced that he would forego royal- 
ties on all the works published after his con- 
version. 

Tolstoy made no attempt at first to propa- 
gate his religious teaching, although it attracted 



many followers. After a visit to the Moscow 
slums iri 1881, he became concerned with social 
conditions, and he subsequently aided the suf- 
ferers of the famine by sponsoring two hun- 
dred and fifty relief kitchens. After his meet- 
ing and intimacy with Chertkov, "Tolstoyism" 
began to develop as an organized sect. Tol- 
stoy's writings became almost exclusively pre- 
occupied with religious problems. In addition 
to numerous pamphlets and plays, he wrote 
IV hat is Art? (1896), in which he explained 
his new aesthetic theories, and Hadji-Murad, 
(1904), which became the favorite work of his 
old age. Although his activities were looked 
upon with increasing suspicion by the official 
authorities, Tolstoy escaped official censure 
until 1901, when he was excommunicated by 
the Orthodox Church. His followers were f re- 
quently subjected to persecution, and many 
were either banished or imprisoned. 

Tolstoy's last years were embittered by 
mounting hostility within his own household. 
Although his personal life was ascetic, he felt 
the ambiguity of his position as a preacher of 
poverty living on his great estate. Finally, at 
the age of eighty-two, with the aid of his daugh- 
ter, Alexandra, he fled from home. His health 
broke down a few days later, and he was re- 
moved from the train to the station-master's 
hut at Astopovo, where he died, November 7, 
1910. He was buried at Yasnaya Polyana, in 
the first public funeral to be held in Russia 
without religious rites. 



CONTEXTS 



BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE v 

The Principal Characters in War and Peace 

Arranged in Family Groups xv 

Dates of Principal Historical Events xvi 

BOOK ONE 

1-5. Anna Sche'rer's soiree i 

6-3. Pierre at Prince Andrew's 1 1 

9. Pierre at Anatole Kurdgin's. D61ok- 

hov's bet 15 

10. A name day at the Rost6vs' 18 

11-1*4. Natasha and Boris 20 

15. Anna Mikhdylovna and Bon's go to the 

dying Count Beziikhov's 26 

16. Pierre at his father's house; talks with 

Boris 27 

17. Countess Rost6va and Anna Mikhay- 

lovna 30 

18-19. Dinner at the Rost6vs'. Marya Dmitri- 

cvna 31 

20. S6nyaand Natasha. Nicholassings.The 

Daniel Cooper 35 

21. At Count Bczukhov's. Prince Vasfli and 

Catiche 37 

22-23. Anna Mikhdylovna and Pierre at Count 

Bczukhov's 41 

24. Anna Mikhdylovna and Catiche strug- 

gle for the inlaid portfolio 45 

25. Bald Hills. Prince N. A. Bolkonski. 

Princess Mary's correspondence with 

Julie Kardgina 47 

26-27. Prince Andrew at Bald Hills 51 

28. Prince Andrew leaves to join the army. 

Princess Mary gives him an icon 55 

BOOK TWO 

1-2. Review near Braunau. Zherk6v and 
D61okhov 60 

3. Kutuzov and an Austrian general. ^Le 

malheureux Mack. Zherk6v's fool- 
ery 65 

4. Nicholas and Denisov. Telydnin and 

the missing purse 68 

5. Nicholas in trouble with his fellow of- 

ficers 72 

6-8. Crossing the Enns. Burning the bridge. 

Rost6v's baptism of fire 74 

9. Prince Andrew sent with dispatches to 

the Austrian court. The Minister of 

War 81 



10. Prince ( Andrew and Billbin 83 

1 1. Hippolyte Kuragin and les ndtres 86 

12. Prince Andrew received by the Emper- 

or Francis. Bilibin's story of the Tha- 
bor Bridge 87 

13-14. Prince Andrew returns to Kutuzov. 
Bagrati6n sent to Hollabriinn. 
Napoleon's letter to Murat 89 

15. Prince Andrew reports to Bagrati6n. 

Captain Tiishin. Soldiers at the front. 
D61okhov talks to a French grena- 
dier 94 

16. Prince Andrew surveys the position. 

The first shot 96 

17. Bagration in action. Tiishin's battery. 

Setting Schon Grabern on fire 97 
18-19. Battle scenes. Quarrelsome command- 
ers. Nicholas injured 99 

20. Panic. Timokhirfs counterattack. D6- 

lokhov's insistence. Tiishin's battery. 
Prince Andrew sent to order him to 
retreat 104 

2 1 . Withdrawal of the forces. Nicholas rides 

on a gun carriage. Tiishin called to 
account by Bagrati6n. Prince Andrew 
defends him. Nicholas' depression 

106 

BOOK THREE 

1-2. Prince Vasfli and Pierre. A soiree at 
AnnaPa vlovna's. IMene'sname day. 
Pierre's marriage 1 1 1 

3. Prince Vasili and Anatole visit Prince 

N. A. Bolkonski. Princess Mary's ap- 
pearance 119 

4. Lise, Mademoiselle Bourienne, Mary, 

Anatole, and old Bolkonski 122 

5. Her father's opposition to Mary's 

marrying. She finds Mademoiselle 
Bourienne and Anatole in the con- 
servatory; declines marriage 126 

6. A letter from Nicholas. S6nya and Na- 

tasha 128 

7. Nicholas visits Boris and Berg in camp. 

Nicholas tells of Schon Grabern. His 
encounter with Prince Andrew 131 

8. The Emperor reviews the army. En- 

thusiasm of Nicholas 135 

9. Boris visits Prince Andrew; at Olimitz. 

Prince Dolgoriikov 137 



vn 



V1U 



CONTENTS 



10. Nicholas not in the action at Wischau. 

The Emperor. Nicholas' devotion to 
him 140 

11. Preparations for action. Dolgorukov's 

opinion of Napoleon and of his posi- 
tion. Kutuzov's depression 142 

1 2. The Council of War. Weyrother's plans. 

Kutiizov sleeps. Prince Andrew's re- 
flections 144 

13. Rost6v at the front. Visit of Bagrati6n 

and Dolgonikov. Rost6v sent to rec- 
onnoiter. Napoleon's proclamation 

M7 

14-19. Battle of Austerlitz. Prince Andrew 
badly wounded 150 

BOOK FOUR 

1. Nicholas home on leave 165 

2. Preparations for Club dinner 168 

3. The dinner. Bagration as guest of 

honor 1 7 1 

4. Pierre challenges D61okhov 173 

5. The duel 176 

6. Pierre's separation from Hlene 177 

7. Andrew considered dead 1 79 

8. Lise's confinement. Andrew arrives 180 

9. Death of Lise 182 

10. Denfsov and D61okhov at the Rost6vs' 

83 

11. S6nya declines D61okhov's proposal 

12. logel's ball. Denfsov's mazurka 186 
13-14. Nicholas loses 43,000 rubles to D61ok- 

hov 188 

15. Nicholas at home. Natdsha sings 190 

16. Nicholas tells his father of his losses. 

Denfsov proposes to Natdsha 192 

BOOK FIVE 

1-2. Pierre meets Bazde"ev 194 

3-4. Pierre becomes a Freemason 198 

5. Pierre repulses Prince Vasfli 203 

6. A soiree at Anna Pdvlovna's. Hlene 

takes up Borfs 204 

7. Hippolyte at Anna Pdvlovna's 206 

8. Old Bolk6nski as commander in chief 

of the conscription. Andrew's anx- 
iety. A letter from his father 206 

9. Bilfbin's letter about the campaign. 

The baby convalescent 208 

10. Pierre goes to Kiev and visits his estates. 

Obstacles to the emancipation of his 
serfs 211 

11. Pierre visits Prince Andrew 213 

12. Pierre's and Prince Andrew's talk on 

the ferry raft 216 



13. "God's folk" at Bald Hills 218 

14. Old Bolk6nski and Pierre 220 

15. Nicholas rejoins his regiment. Shortage 

of provisions 221 

16. Denfsov seizes transports of food, gets 

into trouble, is wounded 223 

17-18. Nicholas visits Denfsov in hospital 225 

19. Borfs at Tilsit. Nicholas' inopportune 

visit 228 

20. Nicholas tries to present Denfsov's peti- 

tion at the Emperor's residence, but 
fails 230 

21. Napoleon and Alexander as allies. 

Perplexity of Nicholas. "Another 
bottle" 232 

BOOK SIX 

1-3. Prince Andrew's occupations at Bogu- 
charovo. His drive through the for- 
estthe bare oak. His visit to the Ros- 
t6vs at Otrddnoe. Overhears Natd- 
sha's talk with S6nya. Return through 
the forest the oak in leaf. He de- 
cides to go to Petersburg 235 

4-6. Sperdnski, Arakcheev, and Prince An- 
drew 238 

7-8. Pierre and the Petersburg Freemasons. 
He visits Joseph Alex^evich. Recon- 
ciliation with H^lene 243 
9. H^lene's social success. Her salon and 
relations with Borfs 247 

10. Pierre's diary 248 

11. The Rost6vs in Petersburg. Berg 

engaged to Vera and demands her 
dowry 250 

12. Natdsha and Borfs 251 

13. Natdsha's bedtime talks with her 

mother 252 

14-17. Natdsha's first grand ball. She dances 
with Prince Andrew 254 

18. Bitski calls on Prince Andrew. Dinner 
at Sperdnski's. Prince Andrew's dis- 
illusionment with him and his re- 
forms 260 
49. Prince Andrew calls on the Rost6vs. 
Natdsha's effect on him 262 
20-21. The Bergs' evening party 263 

22. Natdsha consults her mother. Prince 

Andrew confides in Pierre 265 

23. Prince N. Bolk6nski insists on post- 

ponement of his son's marriage. Na- 
tdsha's distress at Prince Andrew's 
absence. He returns and they become 
engaged 267 

24. Prince Andrew's last days with Na- 

tdsha 270 



CONTENTS 



25. Prince N. Bolk6nski's treatment of 

Mary. Her letter to Julie Kirdgina 

271 

26. Prince N. Bolk6nski threatens to marry 

Mile Bourienne 273 

BOOK SEVEN 

1. Nicholas Rost6v returns home on leave. 

His doubts about Natasha's engagement 

275 

2. Nicholas settles accounts with Mftenka 

277 

3. Nicholas decides to go hunting 278 

4. The wolf hunt begins 279 

5. The wolf is taken 281 

6. The fox hunt and the huntsmen's quarrel. 

Ildgin's courtesy. Chasing a hare. Ru- 
gdy's triumph 284 

7. An evening at "Uncle's." The balaldyka. 

Natasha's Russian dance 287 

8. His mother urges Nicholas to marry Julie 

Karagina, and grumbles at S6nya 291 

9. Christmas at Otradnoe. Natasha is de- 

pressed and capricious 292 

10. Nicholas, Natasha, and S6nya indulge in 

recollections. Dimmlcr plays and Nata- 
sha sings. The maskers. A troyka drive to 
the Melyuk6vs' 294 

11. At Melyuk6vka. Sonya goes to the barn to 

try her fortune 298 

12. The drive home. Natasha and S6nya try 

the future with looking glasses 300 

13. His mother opposes Nicholas' wish to 

marry S6nya, and he returns to his regi- 
ment. Natasha becomes restless and im- 
patient for Prince Andrew's return 301 

BOOK EIGHT 

1. Pierre's life in Moscow. Asks himself "What 

for?" and "Why?" 303 

2. Prince N. Bolk6nski in Moscow. His harsh 

treatment of Princess Mary. She teaches 
little Nicholas. The old prince and Mile 
Bourienne 305 

3. Dr. Mdtivier treated as a spy by the old 

prince. The dinner on the prince's name 
day 307 

4. Pierre and Princess Mary discuss Boris and 

Natdsha 309 

5. Boris and Julie. Their melancholy. Boris 

proposes and is accepted 3 1 1 

6. Count IlydRost6v,Natdsha,andS6nyastay 

with Mdrya Dmftrievna in Moscow 313 

7. Count Rost6v and Natdsha call on Prince 

N. Bolk6nski.They are received by Prin- 
cess Mary. Prince Bolk6nski's strange 



ix 

behavior. Mary and Natisha dislike one 
another 314 

8. The Rost6vs at the Opera. Hlne in the 

next box 316 

9. The Opera described. Anatole and Pierre 

arrive. Natdsha makes Hlne's ac- 
quaintance. Duport dances 318 

10. Hdtene presents Anatole to Natdsha. He 

courts her 320 

11. Anatole and D61okhov in Moscow 321 

12. Sunday at Mdrya Dmftrievna's. Hlne 

calls and invites the Rost6vs to hear Mile 
George recite. She tells Natdsha that 
Anatole is in love with her 322 

13. The reception at Hlne's. Mile George. 

Anatole dances with Natdsha and makes 
love to her. Her perplexity as to her 
own feelings 324 

14. Princess Mary's letter to Natdsha, who also 

receives one from Anatole 325 

15. S6nya finds Anatole's letter and remon- 

strates with Natdsha, who writes to Prin- 
cess Mary breaking off her engagement 
with Prince Andrew. A party at the 
Kardgins'. Anatole meets Natdsha. She 
is angry with S6nya, who resolves to pre- 
vent her elopement 327 

16. Anatole at Dolokhov's. Balagd 329 

17. Anatole sets off to abduct Natdsha, but en- 

counters Mdrya Dmftrievna's footman 

332 

18. Mdrya Dmitrievna reproaches Natdsha. 

Count Ilyd Rost6v is kept in ignorance 

333 

19. Pierre at Mdrya Dmftrievna's. He tells Na- 

tdsha that Anatole is married 334 

20. Pierre's explanation with Anatole 336 

21. Natdsha tries to poison herself. Prince An- 

drew returns to Moscow and Pierre talks 
to him 337 

22. Pierre and Natdsha. He tells her of his de- 

votion. The great comet of 1812 339 

BOOK NINE 

1. The year 1812. Rulers and generals are 

"history's slaves" 342 

2. Napoleon crosses the Niemen and sees 

Polish Uhlans drowned swimming the 
Vfliya 344 

3. Alexander I at Vflna. The ball at Count 

Bennigsen's. Borfs overhears the Em- 
peror speaking to Balashev and learns 
that the French have crossed the fron- 
tier. Alexander's letter to Napole6n 346 

4. Balashev's mission to Napoleon, He meets 

Murat, "the King of Naples" 347 



CONTENTS 



5. Balashev taken to Davout, who treats him 

badly, but he is at last presented to Na- 
poleon in Vilna 349 

6. Balashe'v's interview with Napoleon 350 

7. Balashev dines with Napoleon 354 

8. Prince Andrew on Kutiizov's staff in Mol- 

davia. He is sent to Barclay's army. Visits 
Bald Hills. His talks with his father and 
Princess Mary 355 

9. Prince Andrew in the army at Drissa. Eight 

conflicting parties 358 

10. Prince Andrew is introduced to Pfuel 361
 
Or just let it die the natural death it deserves. He hasn't said one thing different that he hasn't said before and that hasn't been addressed in detail.

Nothing to see here. Literally.

No detail required until the commitment is made.

How about starting by kicking every non-citizen Muslim out of the country? All perfectly legal.

Ishmael
 
No detail required until the commitment is made.

How about starting by kicking every non-citizen Muslim out of the country? All perfectly legal.

Ishmael

Can't we just plug you and your frat boy between the eyes and skip to Step #2?
 
No detail required until the commitment is made.

How about starting by kicking every non-citizen Muslim out of the country? All perfectly legal.

Ishmael

Is it? I doubt that would hold up but I'm curious what law precisely you would use.
 
Is it? I doubt that would hold up but I'm curious what law precisely you would use.

He wouldn't. He can't. The legal grounds for external removal of immigrants are spelled out in federal immigration law. Being Muslim isn't one of them. What Ish means is that theoretically, immigration law could be changed to deport immigrants for literally any reason Congress might choose. That, of course, is true. But it isn't happening.

BusyBody previously cited the original Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 in an attempt to demonstrate that verses in the Quran with regard to militant jihad render ALL immigrant Muslims as ipso facto in violation of the provision of the Act prohibiting immigration to anyone advocating violent overthrow of the federal government. But if that had ever been an operative interpretation of the Act's language, Muslims would have never been allowed to immigrate to begin with.

Never mind current Constitutional law which holds that inflammatory speech, devoid of actual intent or an overt act of such rebellion, is protected.

Finally, believe every gross slander ever levied against former President Bush: He authorized wholesale torture of combat detainees. Lied about WMD in order to invade Iraq. Couldn't wait to assassinate American citizens overseas without due process. Eagerly and illegally spied on millions of American citizens in the most massive surveillance in United States history.

There is not an iota of evidence that it ever ONCE occurred to this monstrous totalitarian despot to advocate the deportation of ANY, much less EVERY, legal Muslim immigrant in the wake of 9/11 -- despite the fact that the crime was COMMITTED BY legal immigrants.

All evidence to the contrary, the guy was obviously a pussy.

So, is mass deportation possible in any place other than a crazy man's dream?

You tell me.
 
James Q. Wilson wrote a profound revelation in his book, BUREAUCRACY: YOU CANT FIX BAD ORGANIZATIONS.

Bad organizations must be destroyed completely. They cant be recycled. Start anew with fresh resources.

Islam is a bad organization. Always has been.
 
Never mind current Constitutional law which holds that inflammatory speech, devoid of actual intent or an overt act of such rebellion, is protected.



So, is mass deportation possible in any place other than a crazy man's dream?

You tell me.

1-Dont let ANY more MUSLIMS in......not an issue at all

2-You NEVER know INTENT until after the fact, so you are saying that we should wait till DEATH and DESTRUCTION to act?

3-Every DAY, in virtually ALL parts of the WORLD, there are ACTS on the INFLAMMATORY speech....all the evidence is there

4-The real ENEMY is you all all the others in this thread that aid and abett TERROR
 
Is it? I doubt that would hold up but I'm curious what law precisely you would use.

He wouldn't. He can't. The legal grounds for external removal of immigrants are spelled out in federal immigration law. Being Muslim isn't one of them. What Ish means is that theoretically, immigration law could be changed to deport immigrants for literally any reason Congress might choose. That, of course, is true. But it isn't happening.

BusyBody previously cited the original Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 in an attempt to demonstrate that verses in the Quran with regard to militant jihad render ALL immigrant Muslims as ipso facto in violation of the provision of the Act prohibiting immigration to anyone advocating violent overthrow of the federal government. But if that had ever been an operative interpretation of the Act's language, Muslims would have never been allowed to immigrate to begin with.

Never mind current Constitutional law which holds that inflammatory speech, devoid of actual intent or an overt act of such rebellion, is protected.

Finally, believe every gross slander ever levied against former President Bush: He authorized wholesale torture of combat detainees. Lied about WMD in order to invade Iraq. Couldn't wait to assassinate American citizens overseas without due process. Eagerly and illegally spied on millions of American citizens in the most massive surveillance in United States history.

There is not an iota of evidence that it ever ONCE occurred to this monstrous totalitarian despot to advocate the deportation of ANY, much less EVERY, legal Muslim immigrant in the wake of 9/11 -- despite the fact that the crime was COMMITTED BY legal immigrants.

All evidence to the contrary, the guy was obviously a pussy.

So, is mass deportation possible in any place other than a crazy man's dream?

You tell me.

Of course the president can issue such an order. 8 USC 1185 is but one basis for such an order. Jimmy Carter issued such an order regarding the Iranians, Iranians who held legally obtained visa's. Under the statute the president can expel anyone at anytime based on any metric, individuals or groups of individuals. Eisenhower also used the statute. And just so you know, religion is a metric used by State to determine eligibility for entry, conversely for denial for entry.

Will he is another question. We know this president won't.

Ishmael
 
ANDREW McCARTHY: Obama’s Denial of Jihad’s Ideological Roots Gravely Endangers the Nation:

The Obama administration calls its national security strategy “Countering Violent Extremism.” In the benighted times before January 20, 2009, we used to call it counter-terrorism.

Why does Obama insist on the more fuzzy “extremism”? Because “terror” has its roots in Islamic scripture. This fact ought to be undeniable, but Obama denies it — and in Washington, he’s far from alone in that.

It is not just that the word terror appears several times in the Koran; it is that the word appears in a particular context: The duty of Muslims to act as Allah’s instrument to terrorize non-Muslims is a recurring scriptural theme. In Sura 3:151, to take one of several examples, Muslims are admonished:

Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the unbelievers.

Omar Abdel Rahman, the “Blind Sheikh” I prosecuted in the mid-’90s after his cell bombed the World Trade Center and planned similar strikes against other New York City landmarks, was a renowned scholar of Islamic jurisprudence. Indeed — and this is worth pausing over — his mastery of our enemy’s ideology was the sole source of his authority to approve jihadist attacks.


The enemy is HOGAN and his elk that scream :cool:LAW
 
Funny that people are actually stupid enough to think that the constitution protects non citizens. Despite the fact that the Supreme Court has held consistently, for more than a century, that constitutional protections that normally benefit Americans and people on American territory do not apply when Congress decides who to admit and who to exclude as immigrants or other entrants.
 
Back
Top