Look at this old fool

[GuiltyPleasure]

http://dingo.care2.com/pictures/causes/3161/3160757.large.jpg

 

[Liar]

Do I have to?

 

[GuiltyPleasure]

Mitch McConnell should be ashamed of himself. On Thursday, December 3, one day after the San Bernardino shootings that killed 14 people, McConnell, along with every Senate Republican except Mark Kirk of Illinois, voted against legislation to prevent people on the F.B.I.’s terrorist watch list from purchasing guns or explosives.

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/one-day...-vote-down-gun-legislation.html#ixzz3tUCpGA7q

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

Mitch McConnell should be ashamed of himself. On Thursday, December 3, one day after the San Bernardino shootings that killed 14 people, McConnell, along with every Senate Republican except Mark Kirk of Illinois, voted against legislation to prevent people on the F.B.I.’s terrorist watch list from purchasing guns or explosives.

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/one-day...-vote-down-gun-legislation.html#ixzz3tUCpGA7q

They already have guns. Count on it.

 

[Aella_]

The only rrue word of wisdom that came from Skudles" mouth:
"Americans have gun boners."

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Mitch McConnell should be ashamed of himself. On Thursday, December 3, one day after the San Bernardino shootings that killed 14 people, McConnell, along with every Senate Republican except Mark Kirk of Illinois, voted against legislation to prevent people on the F.B.I.’s terrorist watch list from purchasing guns or explosives.

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/one-day...-vote-down-gun-legislation.html#ixzz3tUCpGA7q

You should be ashamed of yourself for apparently not understanding that you have no Constitutional right to board a commercial aircraft, as well as your failure to understand the implications of that fact relative to other Constitutional rights that people do have.

 

[GuiltyPleasure]

You should be ashamed of yourself for apparently not understanding that you have no Constitutional right to board a commercial aircraft, as well as your failure to understand the implications of that fact relative to other Constitutional rights that people do have.

Gobbledy-gook. Your constitution applies to you, not me.

 

[Bookishleigh]

I don't know....he just looks like an old man who wants to play pat-a-cake to me. Maybe it's that feeble-minded look he has though....

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Gobbledy-gook. Your constitution applies to you, not me.

Well, if MY Constitution does not apply to you, then I guess I can rightly assume that none of my other federal laws or any state laws within the United States apply to you either, in which case, we can do without your wholly irrelevant opinions about what ANY AMERICAN, including the Senate Majority Leader, should feel ashamed about with respect to all those laws in which you have "no skin in the game" whatsoever, fuckyouverymuch.



Amended to add: Well, in that case, I guess NEITHER of us has a Constitutional right to board a commercial aircraft and ONLY ONE of us has a Constitutional right to own a firearm. Or is that also "gobbledy-gook" to you?

 

[GuiltyPleasure]

Canadian border guards/customs officers get sick of confiscating weapons gun-mad yanks try to bring into our country.

It is your country's shame that it is the only Western "civilization" that is so lax with gun laws and that has a horrendous record of murder using guns and whose congress refuses to agree to even ATTEMPT to do anything to stop the carnage.

Why do you defend this?

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

Canadian border guards/customs officers get sick of confiscating weapons gun-mad yanks try to bring into our country.

It is your country's shame that it is the only Western "civilization" that is so lax with gun laws and that has a horrendous record of murder using guns and whose congress refuses to agree to even ATTEMPT to do anything to stop the carnage.

Why do you defend this?

I think you have on over exaggerated image of what life is really like here in the states. I mean, I didn't kill anyone today. And if it keeps the fraidy cat Canadians from coming here, even better still.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Canadian border guards/customs officers get sick of confiscating weapons gun-mad yanks try to bring into our country.

It is your country's shame that it is the only Western "civilization" that is so lax with gun laws and that has a horrendous record of murder using guns and whose congress refuses to agree to even ATTEMPT to do anything to stop the carnage.

Why do you defend this?

You don't know jack shit about our Constitution, our gun registration laws or what our Congress does or does not "attempt." If your customs officers and border agents get tired of confiscating contraband, then perhaps they should get in another line of work.

Meanwhile, you live in hockey paradise with a great national anthem. Why would you give a fuck what we do as long as we're not shooting YOU?

I don't own a gun. I don't even like guns a little bit. But a little over 200 years ago, the architects of this nation saw fit to draft a Constitution that included the RIGHT of every American to own firearms, if that was their choice.

Far more importantly, that same Constitution included specific provisions for amending itself. Apart from the original 10 amendments known as the Bill of Rights, my countrymen, through their elected representatives, have amended the Constitution 17 times.

Not ONE of those 17 amendments has repealed or modified the Second Amendment which guaranteed the right to bear arms.

It is the collective democratic will of the majority of my fellow citizens to amend the Constitution as they have seen fit and to leave other parts of it intact that I DEFEND. This and nothing more or less.

But seeing as how you are obviously an arrogant, myopic little shit who recognizes nothing other than the supremacy of his own beliefs, I have no doubt this, too, will appear to you as nothing more than "gobbledy-gook."

Go fuck a polar bear.

 

[allateup]

...the architects of this nation saw fit to draft a Constitution that included the RIGHT of every American to own firearms, if that was their choice.

The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendment means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government.

United States v. Cruikshank

.....
Poor Corporal RINO Butthurt...

...just like his progressive lemming brethren, he so needs to desperately hang on to some mythical government constituted with tyrannical powers higher than the natural, inalienable rights of all law-abiding Americans.

 

[mark_j]

The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendment means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government.

United States v. Cruikshank

Cruikshank has largely been gutted in subsequent rulings.. Try again..

 

[allateup]

Cruikshank has largely been gutted in subsequent rulings.. Try again..

I have a more excellent idea:

Why don't you try actually gutting that inalienable right yourself, lemming?

Isn't it strange how confident you are pressing your case individually on the internet, yet how totally impotent you are irl individually if you actually attempted to deprive another individual of her inalienable right to keep and bear arms, so much so that you must summon the collective to force its mob rule for you...

...why is that, wannabe?

 

[dirtwrench]

You don't know jack shit about our Constitution, our gun registration laws or what our Congress does or does not "attempt." If your customs officers and border agents get tired of confiscating contraband, then perhaps they should get in another line of work.

Meanwhile, you live in hockey paradise with a great national anthem. Why would you give a fuck what we do as long as we're not shooting YOU?

I don't own a gun. I don't even like guns a little bit. But a little over 200 years ago, the architects of this nation saw fit to draft a Constitution that included the RIGHT of every American to own firearms, if that was their choice.

Far more importantly, that same Constitution included specific provisions for amending itself. Apart from the original 10 amendments known as the Bill of Rights, my countrymen, through their elected representatives, have amended the Constitution 17 times.

Not ONE of those 17 amendments has repealed or modified the Second Amendment which guaranteed the right to bear arms.

It is the collective democratic will of the majority of my fellow citizens to amend the Constitution as they have seen fit and to leave other parts of it intact that I DEFEND. This and nothing more or less.

But seeing as how you are obviously an arrogant, myopic little shit who recognizes nothing other than the supremacy of his own beliefs, I have no doubt this, too, will appear to you as nothing more than "gobbledy-gook."

Go fuck a polar bear.

WOW. First, I do NOT disagree with you Colonel. Second, I am just a little surprised by your pissed-offed-ness. Normally the posts of yours I read are more restrained. Proud of ya man.

 

[mark_j]

I have a more excellent idea:

Why don't you try actually gutting that inalienable right yourself, lemming?

Isn't it strange how confident you are pressing your case individually on the internet, yet how totally impotent you are irl individually if you actually attempted to deprive another individual of her inalienable right to keep and bear arms, so much so that you must summon the collective to force its mob rule for you...

...why is that, wannabe?

What the fuck are you blathering on about? I was pointing out that Cruikshank is a poor example and has largely been gutted in regard to 2A cases. Now you want to try again or has the chemical fog addled your brain?

 

[allateup]

What the fuck are you blathering on about? I was pointing out that Cruikshank is a poor example and has largely been gutted in regard to 2A cases. Now you want to try again or has the chemical fog addled your brain?

The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second Amendment means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the National Government.

United States v. Cruikshank

Why don't you try again, wannabe.

 

[PoppingTom]

You don't know jack shit about our Constitution, our gun registration laws or what our Congress does or does not "attempt." If your customs officers and border agents get tired of confiscating contraband, then perhaps they should get in another line of work.

Meanwhile, you live in hockey paradise with a great national anthem. Why would you give a fuck what we do as long as we're not shooting YOU?

In other words: you, the Americans, aren't humans?

It is the collective democratic will of the majority of my fellow citizens to amend the Constitution as they have seen fit and to leave other parts of it intact that I DEFEND. This and nothing more or less.

If you got at least a little bit of reasoning in you - and till that post, you was quite known to have - you see how this will lead your country into. Defending your people and their rights is one thing, nobody denies your patriotism. Defending minds and watching your people running in even more misery than before is another.

Don't make a fool out of yourself in pretending, with every new sold weapon in the US, your country becomes a better place.

 

[miles]

ColonelHogan- 87
Guilty Pleasure - 0

 

[miles]

mark_j: 44
allateeup:0

 

[miles]

Facts and logic are not liberals' strong points.

 

[Aella_]

What do those nombers mean?

 

[PoppingTom]

I think there is a bigger plan behind this.

But then, it's a miles plan.

http://media.moddb.com/images/groups/1/3/2074/demotivational-poster-130911.jpg

 

[putzpotus]

the so called LIST is a POLITICAL document

Ted Kennedy was on a NO FLY LIST....he could get himself off, an innocent person cant