Poor Negro

[NOIRTRASH]

A BLM Negro got his ass kicked at a Trump rally. He came to disrupt the assembly but got knocked onto his ass, hit, and choked by people in the audience.

Oh My

The press is apoplectic. Some reporters were roughed up, too, trying to film it. Prolly knew it was coming down.

But calling someone means nothing by itself. Most monarchs are fascists.

All a fascist is, is one person at the head of the government, who makes the rules and policies alone. Stalin and Hitler were fascist dictators, so were FDR and Churchill, for all intents and purposes. Hitlers Reichstag was as useless as Parliament and Congress.

 

[JackLuis]

Why haven't we see headlines like:

"Trump Thugs beat protester Donald called 'obnoxious'."

 

[Wrong Element]

The fact that Trump is essentially a fascist is getting harder to ignore. Of course, for JBJ that's a selling point.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

The fact that Trump is essentially a fascist is getting harder to ignore. Of course, for JBJ that's a selling point.

My hero was Franco. He took Spain away from the Socialist shitheads who impoverished everyone but the rich, and Spaniards did well till Franco died and a king and Socialists took over and wrecked the nation again.

I like fascists.

 

[Hard_Rom]

And flies like shit and garbage!

 

[DooleyDarter]

And flies like shit and garbage!

Eat shit, 100 billions flies can't be wrong.

 

[Hard_Rom]

Considering a flies intellect and yours I am not surprised you agree.

 

[Boxlicker101]

The fact that Trump is essentially a fascist is getting harder to ignore. Of course, for JBJ that's a selling point.

Obama is essentially a fascist too, ignoring Congress and trying to rule by fiat.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Obama is essentially a fascist too, ignoring Congress and trying to rule by fiat.

Except to a lesser degree than any president in what is it? Nearly a century? And only because his Congress is legendarily uncooperative. So yes, exactly the same thing.

 

[JackLuis]

Obama is essentially a fascist too, ignoring Congress and trying to rule by fiat.

Oh Box! Can you show one or two cases of his Fiat rule, other than Chrysler?

You make the claim based on what exactly? At least JB makes some sense, distorted as it may be, but you just spout the propaganda in the hopes that the ignorant will believe you.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Oh Box! Can you show one or two cases of his Fiat rule, other than Chrysler?

You make the claim based on what exactly? At least JB makes some sense, distorted as it may be, but you just spout the propaganda in the hopes that the ignorant will believe you.

The nuclear treaty with Iran. Obama is trying to implement it without the consent of the Senate, which is a violation of the Constitution.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Okay I'll await Colonel Hogan for official reading but my reading of the Constitution doesn't show me where Obama going about his business is a violation of the Constitution. At least not the letter of the law, perhaps the spirit.

But please enlighten me. I admit that despite reading it several times I've never committed it to memory and occasionally I'll forget that something was mentioned in one article or another or simply misunderstood (or in some cases disagree.) with how this or that is read.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Okay I'll await Colonel Hogan for official reading but my reading of the Constitution doesn't show me where Obama going about his business is a violation of the Constitution. At least not the letter of the law, perhaps the spirit.

But please enlighten me. I admit that despite reading it several times I've never committed it to memory and occasionally I'll forget that something was mentioned in one article or another or simply misunderstood (or in some cases disagree.) with how this or that is read.

Article 2, Section 2, Paragraph 2.

 

[Hard_Rom]

Obama is essentially a fascist too, ignoring Congress and trying to rule by fiat.

Stephen Harper prorogued parliament to avoid a No Confidence vote.

Up here we have really two main parties. Neither minces about with names. Liberals and Conservatives. Always fringe elements but is best to hippy fringe than a Nazi fringe. We realize this and have a third lefty party. Far better to have than a far righty element.

 

[JackLuis]

The nuclear treaty with Iran. Obama is trying to implement it without the consent of the Senate, which is a violation of the Constitution.

The nuclear treaty was hammered out with our allies and Russia and the Iranians. If the Senate doesn't ratify it, like the the League of Nations one, do you think it would be a good thing? How about the TPP, trade deal, will the Senate ratify that like they did NAFTA so we can send the rest of our jobs overseas?

As far as I can tell, Obama hasn't made the Senate completely irrelevant. However the Republicans have made Congress impotent by not addressing any real issues facing our country. All they seem to have done for the last four years or so is piss and moan about how bad he is at leading, but haven't offered any leadership themselves.

If you want to bitch about Obama why not raise holy hell about his drone strikes killing Americans and others on the hunch that they are about to decide to maybe do something? Or his continuing the Bush surveillance program with out warrents? Or his not sacking the Defense Secty, because he has not released the Gitmo prisoners that have been cleared or the ones that have had no charges brought against them?

You're not complaining about his actual faults only repeating the propaganda that the FOX and Limbaugh talking heads spout. Get real Box. Obama has faults address them.

 

[Boxlicker101]

The nuclear treaty was hammered out with our allies and Russia and the Iranians. If the Senate doesn't ratify it, like the the League of Nations one, do you think it would be a good thing? How about the TPP, trade deal, will the Senate ratify that like they did NAFTA so we can send the rest of our jobs overseas?

As far as I can tell, Obama hasn't made the Senate completely irrelevant. However the Republicans have made Congress impotent by not addressing any real issues facing our country. All they seem to have done for the last four years or so is piss and moan about how bad he is at leading, but haven't offered any leadership themselves.

If you want to bitch about Obama why not raise holy hell about his drone strikes killing Americans and others on the hunch that they are about to decide to maybe do something? Or his continuing the Bush surveillance program with out warrents? Or his not sacking the Defense Secty, because he has not released the Gitmo prisoners that have been cleared or the ones that have had no charges brought against them?

You're not complaining about his actual faults only repeating the propaganda that the FOX and Limbaugh talking heads spout. Get real Box. Obama has faults address them.

Are you aware the LN treaty failed because of Dem. opposition? http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0319.html

The GOP is trying to accomplish something, but their efforts are blocked by Harry Reed and/or vetoed by Obama.

 

[Boxlicker101]

The nuclear treaty was hammered out with our allies and Russia and the Iranians. If the Senate doesn't ratify it, like the the League of Nations one, do you think it would be a good thing? How about the TPP, trade deal, will the Senate ratify that like they did NAFTA so we can send the rest of our jobs overseas?

As far as I can tell, Obama hasn't made the Senate completely irrelevant. However the Republicans have made Congress impotent by not addressing any real issues facing our country. All they seem to have done for the last four years or so is piss and moan about how bad he is at leading, but haven't offered any leadership themselves.

If you want to bitch about Obama why not raise holy hell about his drone strikes killing Americans and others on the hunch that they are about to decide to maybe do something? Or his continuing the Bush surveillance program with out warrents? Or his not sacking the Defense Secty, because he has not released the Gitmo prisoners that have been cleared or the ones that have had no charges brought against them?

You're not complaining about his actual faults only repeating the propaganda that the FOX and Limbaugh talking heads spout. Get real Box. Obama has faults address them.

Are you aware the LN treaty failed because of Dem. opposition? http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0319.html

The GOP is trying to accomplish something, but their efforts are blocked by Harry Rted and/or vetoed by Obama.

 

[Boxlicker101]

The nuclear treaty was hammered out with our allies and Russia and the Iranians. If the Senate doesn't ratify it, like the the League of Nations one, do you think it would be a good thing? How about the TPP, trade deal, will the Senate ratify that like they did NAFTA so we can send the rest of our jobs overseas?

As far as I can tell, Obama hasn't made the Senate completely irrelevant. However the Republicans have made Congress impotent by not addressing any real issues facing our country. All they seem to have done for the last four years or so is piss and moan about how bad he is at leading, but haven't offered any leadership themselves.

If you want to bitch about Obama why not raise holy hell about his drone strikes killing Americans and others on the hunch that they are about to decide to maybe do something? Or his continuing the Bush surveillance program with out warrents? Or his not sacking the Defense Secty, because he has not released the Gitmo prisoners that have been cleared or the ones that have had no charges brought against them?

You're not complaining about his actual faults only repeating the propaganda that the FOX and Limbaugh talking heads spout. Get real Box. Obama has faults address them.

Are you aware the LN vote was almost a century ago and was defeated by Dems? http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0319.html

The Republic Congress is trying to accomplish things, but their attempts are either thwarted by Harry Reid or vetoed by Obama. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2014/08/04/harry-reids-reign-of-paralysis/

Here is something more recent: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...-wasting-american-peoples-time-attempt-detain

 

[JackLuis]

Are you aware the LN vote was almost a century ago and was defeated by Dems? http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0319.html

The Republic Congress is trying to accomplish things, but their attempts are either thwarted by Harry Reid of vetoed by Obama.

Yes I know the LoN was a long time ago and defeated by the isolationists then in power in the Senate. Were they right? Who knows?

That's the way the mop flops in democracy. I fault Reid for not changing the filibuster rules when he had the chance. He was raised up in a corrupt system and didn't have the nerve to do the right thing.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Why haven't we see headlines like:

"Trump Thugs beat protester Donald called 'obnoxious'."

This.

 

[phrodeau]

The nuclear treaty with Iran. Obama is trying to implement it without the consent of the Senate, which is a violation of the Constitution.

The nuclear treaty with Iran has been implemented for 45 years.

Obama made a deal with Iran, not a treaty.

 

[The_Trouvere]

A BLM Negro got his ass kicked at a Trump rally. He came to disrupt the assembly but got knocked onto his ass, hit, and choked by people in the audience.

Oh My

The press is apoplectic. Some reporters were roughed up, too, trying to film it. Prolly knew it was coming down.

I wish this happened to the Black Lives Matter thugs who interrupted a speech by Bernie Sanders. Colored people need to remember how to grin and shuffle.

 

[DooleyDarter]

Considering a flies intellect and yours I am not surprised you agree.

actually I was calling you a piece of shit

 

[KingOrfeo]

All a fascist is, is one person at the head of the government, who makes the rules and policies alone.

No, that would be a dictator or absolute monarch, and those have been around forever. Fascism is a thing that never existed before the 20th Century.

Fascism — For Our Nation, Our Leader, and Victory!

The chief objective of Fascism is strengthening the nation and increasing its prestige through warfare — i.e. Type 2 Patriotic Fervor taken to its extreme. Fascism shares Nationalism’s belief that only ‘nations’ matter (and individual/actual people don’t) but completely rejects Liberalism and so hates individuality and all other non-national senses of identity. Fascism opposes equality between nations as it wants its own to either be the only one in existence or merely (the most) powerful, but has no set opinion on equality within its nation (let alone other nations). Fascism has no opinion on capitalism or economics and loves war because Fascism is about passion and national honor, not numbers and planning. Fascism may overlap with ‘race’ and ‘racial theory’ insofar as it defines who belongs to the nation, but not necessarily.

Philosophically, it arises from a Continental Counter-Enlightenment philosophical context, influenced by such thinkers as J.G. Fichte, Martin Heidegger, and Georg Hegel. Its origins have some overlap with that of socialism, with Benito Mussolini (the proverbial father of fascism politically) being a former Marxist. Historically, its roots can be searched for in the ethos of stormtrooper formations of late World War I; many ex-soldiers carried on this spirit of aggression and elitism as they went on to dabble in extreme politics, among them Mussolini himself. Whereas Marx replaced Hegel’s “Zeitgeist” (or “spirit of the age”) with the prevailing economic system, fascists replace the zeitgeist with the spirit of the nation. Fascism argues for an organic conception of a nation with the State seen as the embodiment of the national spirit: as such, fascist regimes feature strong central governments which are authoritarian in nature. Individuals are seen, fundamentally, as products of the nation (similar to how Marxian “methodological collectivism” views individuals as products of their economic class) — hence, fascism requires a strong identification with nationality and national identity on the part of the people, rejecting all individualism or identification with economic class. Fascism often claims to represent the entire nation, subservient to the State and unified behind the Leader, undivided e.g. by class struggles; in the eyes of a fascist, a popular autocrat is a better representation of the people’s interests and desires than an elected parliament, which is viewed contemptuously as a den of immorality and ineffectual bickering. Given this stance, fascism is inherently undemocratic and autocratic.

Strong national identification involves a veneration of not just the nation in abstract, but of practices seen as fundamental to national identity: this results in a reverence for tradition. Traditions are seen as important rituals that connect people to the national spirit. Furthermore, fascism tends to support social policy positions which are regarded as conservative or right-wing. However, these policy positions are conservative in the Oakeshottean sense of the term: they are considered the right policies because they are consistent with national traditions, rather than because of any pre-existing moral commitments. Indeed, to a fascist, a moral commitment that ‘pre-exists’ inside an individual’s mind independently of said individual's nationality is a ridiculous notion, as they believe individuals are ‘socially constructed’ by their nationality as was stated before. Many argue that ethical relativism (i.e. what is good for Nation X may not be good for Nation Y) is thus an integral part of fascism and a logical consequence of fascism’s belief in ‘national spirits.’ It should also be kept in mind, however, that while fascists do use reverence for tradition and national identity, those in themselves are not fascist.

That does not mean that fascism doesn’t have a system of ethics and values, however — instead, that system of ethics is rooted in concepts of struggle, power, and obedience. Typically this is expressed in the form of an extreme cultural militarism, with the military being an expression of the power and might of the State, and the mentality of eagerness and action for action’s sake.

The most infamous element of fascism is its support for Social Darwinism of various sorts. In Mussolini’s and Hitler’s regimes, a level of internal “creative tension” within the components of the nation was seen as beneficial in directing competitive desires towards the service of the State. Furthermore, Hitler's version of fascism (National Socialism, a.k.a. Nazism) combined this Social-Darwinist ethos with an institutional belief in white supremacy to posit an evolutionary struggle between various races. We all know where this led, so further elaboration is not necessary.

Things get more complicated when outlining fascist economics. Since fascism is used as an epithet and it is popularly believed that if Fascists did it, then it is bad, a long intellectual battle has been waged over how to characterize the economics of Fascism.

Typically, the term “corporatism” is used to describe fascist economics. It describes a situation wherein all the large privately-owned economic institutions (corporations, industry cartels and the like) are brought into collusion with the government and become part of the apparatus of the State’s economic planning. Additionally, private ownership and ability to do business become contingent on service to the State. Thus, while ownership of the means of production (the stuff used to produce other stuff) remains in private hands and continues to be operated with a for-profit objective, ultimate control is exercised by the State. Fascist governments also exercise further control over the economy via methods such as price-fixing.

The fascist economic system is in keeping with the ideology’s totalitarian nature, where no other institution can be allowed to rival the State in power and influence. This quality also leads to a hostility toward labor unions and other organised worker groups, with such institutions typically being repressed and dissolved. Mussolini’s Italy did in fact see the creation of new trade unions following the dissolution of the old ones: these new unions were owned and operated by the State, with very little advocacy on workers' behalf.

This system invites comparisons with many forms of state socialism, as both ideologies involve a centrally-planned economy with the State in control of the means of production. Although ownership remains private in the fascist system, many classical-liberal critiques of fascism have argued that “ownership without control” is a senseless, inherently illogical notion, and that fascism is economically indistinguishable from state socialism and therefore is a variant of state socialism. Still, even a cursory look at the two ideologies will demonstrate the radical differences in ethos, even if comparisons in actual outcome are legitimate.

Marxist critiques of fascism, conversely, argue that fascism is a form of capitalism, in the sense of Marx’s initial definition of the term (see the “Marxism” subsection above). Despite being highly regimented and controlled by the State, fascist economies still have private ownership of industries by an upper class who make profit from the labor of workers; as profit still exists, the economy is still exploitative and thus a form of capitalism. Fascism is on the whole strongly anti-Marxist and anti-socialist, and the two ideologies are usually rivals in attempts to take power during crises like economic depressions — Marxism thus considers fascism to be at best a power play coming out of the petit bourgeois, and at worst little more than a group of violent thugs controlled by the capitalist class brought in as enforcers to defend the old order (and whether or not it acknowledges this status is regarded as irrelevant, since in practice they still end up defending capitalism).

However, ultimately economics in fascism is usually a secondary concern; they claim the “Third Position” on the issue between capitalist and communist.

Contemporary fascist groups can only succeed by the use of fantastic lies to deceive the public. Whether through conspiracy theories, Holocaust denial or scare tactics, people aren’t likely to side with a group at odds with their liberties unless they convince the public that the powers that be will enslave them anyway. Most often, this comes down to conspiracies blaming some sinister cabal of ceding their nation’s sovereignty to the UN by destroying national identity through immigration which is Insane Troll Logic at its finest.

 

[curly1]

BLM thug got his loud mouth ass handed to him.