How Global Warming Really Works



by Donna Laframboise
Author, The Delinquent Teenager Who Was Mistaken For The World's Top Climate Expert

http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2015/11/11/the-naked-climate-change-emperor/




The Naked Climate Change Emperor


...A few weeks ago, a Paris-based company specializing in mathematical modelling released a 195-page white paper. Absolutely free of charge, the Société de Calcul Mathématique (SCM) provides an alternative perspective on the same questions the IPCC has spent 27 years examining.

Unlike many members of the public, the authors of this paper are well equipped to understand the IPCC’s charts and calculations. They declare that there “is not a single fact, figure or observation that leads us to conclude that the world’s climate is in any way ‘disturbed.”’ Rising sea levels, they say, are a “normal phenomenon” that have “nothing to do with so-called global warming.” Moreover, while they admit humanity has had some effect on the climate, they consider human influence to be:
tiny, quite negligible in comparison with natural causes. Nature makes major changes, human beings make small ones, which our natural arrogance lends a significance they simply do not have. [p. 4]


One third of this white paper is devoted to the IPCC, and ‘scathing’ doesn’t begin to describe that section. The IPCC’s methodology, says the SCM, is “highly biased” and “arbitrary.” IPCC statements and conclusions are dismissed as being entirely meaningless, logically flawed, totally absurd, intellectually dishonest, and in violation of scientific norms.

The SCM accuses the IPCC of relying on “entirely hypothetical” mechanisms and “nonvalidated mathematical models.” Using such models to guide political decisions, it says, is “dishonest and illogical.”


more...
http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2015/11/11/the-naked-climate-change-emperor/



Ahhh, come on. Why would ANY politician want to push a flawed theory based on nonsense mathematics and statistics? More power and money for them perhaps?

Ishmael
 
Ahhh, come on. Why would ANY politician want to push a flawed theory based on nonsense mathematics and statistics? More power and money for them perhaps?

Ishmael

It's always about the money in politics.
 
Ahhh, come on. Why would ANY politician want to push a flawed theory based on nonsense mathematics and statistics? More power and money for them perhaps?

Ishmael

It's always about the money in politics.

Money? Yes.

Just as likely, the perfection of society and a pastoral and pleasant Return of the Primitive through the abrogation of human nature. It does take money to do this, but a religiously-inspired collective guilt has been the historical locus of Uncle Toohey driven mass movements.

#BlackLiversAlmaMater
 
Should I now provide a link to the thread, "It's the Sun stupid." Or to the, "It's Still the Sun stupid" thread?

*chuckle*

Ishmael
 
Should I now provide a link to the thread, "It's the Sun stupid." Or to the, "It's Still the Sun stupid" thread?

*chuckle*

Ishmael

THE SUN???

You deniers keep turning back to ancient discredited religions that worshipped the Sun as a gawd!

Our new religion is so much more sophisticated. It properly puts man squarely back into the center of the universe where he properly belongs...
 
THE SUN???

You deniers keep turning back to ancient discredited religions that worshipped the Sun as a gawd!

Our new religion is so much more sophisticated. It properly puts man squarely back into the center of the universe where he properly belongs...

Ahh, you mean under the heel of the elite.

Ishmael
 



So, you think the historic global temperature records are reliable?

Here's how the temperature records for the ocean (remember, that's 70% of the earth's surface) were compiled.



ERI= Engine room intake
Bucket= (literally) throwing a canvas bucket overboard (I swear to god, I'm not making this up)

https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/figure-2.png



They haven't got a frickin' clue whether global temperatures are warmer or not.



 



“The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible”
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (the "IPCC")
Third Assessment Report​



 



“The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible”
-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (the "IPCC")
Third Assessment Report​




I will be talking to some of those guys next week.
 
I will be talking to some of those guys next week.


For god's sake, ask them why they believe the historic temperature record data is reliable enough to use to judge whether there has even been any global warming.

Ask them why they've been so wrong.

Then, ask them why they don't admit that climate sensitivity is such a complete unknown.

Given the demonstrable lack of a relationship between levels of atmospheric CO2 and global temperature over the last eighteen years, why don't they admit that there is little evidence of an anthropogenic cause of "climate change."

What evidence is there of something other than perfectly normal, natural climate variability?

Lastly, when are they going to admit that there is virtually no evidence to support the dangerous anthropogenic global warming conjecture.






...Those compiling the global averaged surface air temperature record have not only ignored systematic measurement error, but have even neglected the detection limits of the instruments themselves. Since at least 1860, thermometer accuracy has been magicked out of thin air. Also since then, and at the 95% confidence interval, the rate or magnitude of the global rise in surface air temperature is unknowable. Current arguments about air temperature and its unprecedentedness are speculative theology...
-Pat Frank, Ph.D.​







 
Back
Top