Things we didn't know

[SamScribble]

Oh, gosh! I hope Great Aunt Louise didn't see this.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ither-bisexual-or-gay-but-never-straight.html

 

[Handley_Page]

Oh, gosh! I hope Great Aunt Louise didn't see this.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ither-bisexual-or-gay-but-never-straight.html

Nothing simple Ever comes out from Essex.

 

[Hypoxia]

But of course. Everybody is bi. Most just don't know or admit it. Society is so constraining.

 

[legerdemer]

Who knew? Perhaps I've been watching the wrong stuff... or the wrong people. Or maybe I should do more. LOL

 

[barefootgirl69]

No, no, no,! Straight as a pin...if I get turned on by watching it's because I'm enjoying what he's doing, and in my mind, it's me in that video

 

[HandsInTheDark]

If you get your science from the newspapers, you'll never lack for ignorance.

 

[NotWise]

I think the marketers have known this forever. They use flirty, sexy young women to sell products to other women. Why? Because it works.

 

[TxRad]

82% 0f all the women were aroused by both male and female stimuli. 74% of the women who identified as straight did the same.

Pupil dilation was the main perimeter they used.

Hmmm, I wonder if they took into account that women are more emotional on a sexual level than men. Sounds like a lot was left out in their thinking when they planned this study.

Shock can cause pupil dilation among other things.

Someone needs to take this back to the drawing board.

 

[DreamCloud]

There is a large correlation between death and wearing underwear. Therefore, wearing underwear causes death.

 

[TxRad]

There is a large correlation between death and wearing underwear. Therefore, wearing underwear causes death.

Maybe that's why there are so many old nudists.

 

[Hypoxia]

I didn't check the details TL/DR but I wonder what imagery was used. Soft or hard core? High or low quality? Straight and/or homoerotic? How did men vs women react to MM vs MF cocksucking, FF vs MF cuntlicking, MM vs FF vs FF 69ing, various butt-fucking and strap-on pegging, 2-somes vs 3-somes vs more-somes, multiracial, dom/sub, costumery / footwear, etc?

Folks self-identifying as 'straight' may find themselves turned on by unexpected stuff if the photography is right. Any particular set of gonads can be made to look appealing (or not) to almost anyone. Those are the same tricks magazine food toggers use. Get just the right contrast, just the right gleam...

How to design the experiment: A larger subject sample, sure. But use the highest-rated pornographic images available, a wide range of them, all the best slurping and insertions and spewing and visual ecstasy. My hypothesis: everyone reacts to good smut. It looks like a worthwhile study. Can we get a grant?

 

[coochiebarber]

Does it mean guys watching a video of couple having sex are 'BI' too?

 

[Learin]

This is a big load of biased bollocks.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

Arousal isn't desire. Desire isn't action.


If you don't obsess about IT you aint likely on the team or a fan.

 

[Bramblethorn]

Oh, gosh! I hope Great Aunt Louise didn't see this.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ither-bisexual-or-gay-but-never-straight.html

I've got something to tell you about Great Aunt Louise. You may want to sit down...

 

[oggbashan]

Something else we didn't know

Spaghetti Bolognese is NOT a local Bologna dish.

Ragù alla bolognese has evolved with the cuisine of the region. Most notable is the preferred choice of pasta, which today is widely recognized as fresh tagliatelle.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolognese_sauce

DON'T ask for spaghetti bolognese in Bologna. They don't eat it nor cook it.

But the Ragu? Delicious!

 

[lovecraft68]

No, no, no,! Straight as a pin...if I get turned on by watching it's because I'm enjoying what he's doing, and in my mind, it's me in that video

And same can be said for men. I would much rather watch a porn video where the guy is good looking and well built than a fat pig like Ron Jeremy.

It doesn't mean I'm into men it just means its more arousing to watch two attractive people having sex than when one of them looks like an ape.

I've also set some guys off in conversations by mentioning that we men do indeed stare at the guys cock during a video, what else is she sucking on? Or do the 'real men' somehow only see her mouth and nothing going in it

 

[lovecraft68]

This is a big load of biased bollocks.

No, just more misogyny and 15 year old male fantasy. This link should go over well here

 

[lovecraft68]

My wife is as straight as they come, but she will watch a porn scene between two women-she enjoys cougar/kitten -videos simply because the women are attractive, the scenes are arousing and usually much more erotic than straight porn, but she has no desire to actually do anything with another woman.

I enjoy the bi sexual pic thread where its a woman with two men. Even though I have no desire to be with a man in anyway I find sexuality exciting and the 'combinations' two bi men and a woman can get into are pretty hot.

I guess I think sex is hot in general even if its something I wouldn't do, its about looking at the people doing it who are enjoying it.

I find a man and woman giving a man a double blow job, pretty damn hot, but I would never want it done to me, or do it myself, its just the idea.

Then again I'm not one of the real men.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

And same can be said for men. I would much rather watch a porn video where the guy is good looking and well built than a fat pig like Ron Jeremy.

It doesn't mean I'm into men it just means its more arousing to watch two attractive people having sex than when one of them looks like an ape.

I've also set some guys off in conversations by mentioning that we men do indeed stare at the guys cock during a video, what else is she sucking on? Or do the 'real men' somehow only see her mouth and nothing going in it

I pay little or no attention to cocks. I pay attention to her responses to him. She's the show.

 

[HandsInTheDark]

I pay little or no attention to cocks. I pay attention to her responses to him. She's the show.

Same here. If there is too much focus on a cock or even the overall mechanics, I find something else to watch. I like seeing pretty young women coming apart at the emotional seams, loving what happens to them. I want to see her face. Men are furniture at best. Porn would be better if the men were largely transparent.

There's virtually no good erotic video out there. They know how to film mechanics, but good women actors (or good gracious, women who truly enjoy the act) don't seem to get on camera often, probably because they have better options.

 

[tomlitilia]

This is going to come up in a lot of persuasive conversations... "Come on honey, of course we should have a threesome with your friend. It's scientifically proven that you want to lick her pussy!"

 

[lovecraft68]

Same here. If there is too much focus on a cock or even the overall mechanics, I find something else to watch. I like seeing pretty young women coming apart at the emotional seams, loving what happens to them. I want to see her face. Men are furniture at best. Porn would be better if the men were largely transparent.

There's virtually no good erotic video out there. They know how to film mechanics, but good women actors (or good gracious, women who truly enjoy the act) don't seem to get on camera often, probably because they have better options.

I believe you are the definirion of the "real man"

You have stated women in control in sex is weird. We have well established you belive a woman's roll in sex is to be subjicated and abused.

Now the last ingredient the "I don't look at cocks in porn!" Homophobia.

Classic Real man syndrome.

 

[DreamCloud]

Maybe that's why there are so many old nudists.

Go commando and live longer.

 

[NaokoSmith]

Oh, gosh! I hope Great Aunt Louise didn't see this.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ither-bisexual-or-gay-but-never-straight.html

Ruddy researchers , don't tell the men! How do you think we housewives get by in Stepford? Tupperware parties?