BBC Reality Star Faces Jail for Saying Down Syndrome Babies Should Be ‘Put Down’…

[DSpeeGal]

BBC Reality Star Faces Jail for Saying Down Syndrome Babies Should Be ‘Put Down’…

Pressgrave Ursula - UK reality show star

She should have just called for them to be aborted, which would have made her a hero and provided a major career boost.

Via Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ck-Facebook-message-born-s-Syndrome-down.html

The call centre worker, who appeared alongside Nev Wilshire in the BBC Three fly-on-the-wall series, was arrested after police also found photos joking about the disabled on her phone, Swansea Magistrates’ Court heard.


hey free specch? WHATS THAT?

 

[DSpeeGal]

A BBC reality TV star could be jailed for posting on Facebook that children born with Down's Syndrome should be 'put down'.
Ursula Presgrave - who appeared on BBC3's The Call Centre - was taken to court after saying disabled children should be killed instead of living the 'pointless life of a vegetable'.
The 23-year-old pleaded guilty to an offence under the Malicious Communications act and now faces a maximum sentence of six months in jail or a £5,000 fine.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ssage-born-s-Syndrome-down.html#ixzz3qdHiSorl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[DSpeeGal]

You British must b proud

 

[Hard_Rom]

Free speech is the "right" to criticize your government and it's policies. Not call for the murder of handicapped people.

Didn't Hitler operate gas wagons for mentally challenged individuals.

It's only loud mouth obnoxious and very stupid people who think otherwise. To think you an just open you mouth and let filth flow from it is despicable.

There are people out there who would promote man/boy love affairs as proper, that what colour your skin is determines who you are, that euthanizing challenged people is right, that guns are good.

These are the folk who should be put away.

Put the pedos, the racists and the Nazi types all on one island.

Then nuke the fuckers.

 

[DSpeeGal]

You,

Are

Retarded

 

[NOIRTRASH]

BBC Reality Star Faces Jail for Saying Down Syndrome Babies Should Be ‘Put Down’…

Pressgrave Ursula - UK reality show star

She should have just called for them to be aborted, which would have made her a hero and provided a major career boost.

Via Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ck-Facebook-message-born-s-Syndrome-down.html

The call centre worker, who appeared alongside Nev Wilshire in the BBC Three fly-on-the-wall series, was arrested after police also found photos joking about the disabled on her phone, Swansea Magistrates’ Court heard.


hey free specch? WHATS THAT?

God sent the Muslims to put down the Brits.

 

[Hard_Rom]

God sent the Muslims to put down the Brits.

So you admit Muslims are God's children and do his work? Careful there are some really stupid and ignorant folk here who will jump all over you for remarks like that. Real hateful fuckers too.

 

[bluemoves01]

Rubbish

1. She is not a star, i have never heard of her.

2. The story was in the Mail ( gutter press) never believe anything they write.

 

[DSpeeGal]

So the story is a lie?

 

[Hard_Rom]

1. She is not a star, i have never heard of her.

2. The story was in the Mail ( gutter press) never believe anything they write.

But Inquiring minds want to know!

 

[DSpeeGal]

So the prosecutor quoted saying her cell phone was siezed

Lied?

 

[Mike_Yates]

When I was in high school, I was threatened with arrest for having made fun of the intellect of special education students.

Evidently freedom of speech has strict limits.

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1245292

 

[Hard_Rom]

The right to freedom of expression is recognized as a human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 19 of the ICCPR states that "everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference" and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice".

Article 19 additionally states that the exercise of these rights carries "special duties and responsibilities" and may "therefore be subject to certain restrictions" when necessary "[f]or respect of the rights or reputation of others" or "[f]or the protection of national security or of public order (order public), or of public health or morals".

In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations.[1][2] Deciding what (if anything) counts as "morally obligatory" is a principal concern of ethics.

Philosophers refer to people who have moral responsibility for an action as moral agents. Agents have the capability to reflect on their situation, to form intentions about how they will act, and then to carry out that action. The notion of free will has become an important issue in the debate on whether individuals are ever morally responsible for their actions and, if so, in what sense. Incompatibilists regard determinism as at odds with free will, whereas compatibilists think the two can coexist.

Moral responsibility does not necessarily equate to legal responsibility. A person is legally responsible for an event when a legal system is liable to penalise that person for that event. Although it may often be the case that when a person is morally responsible for an act, they are also legally responsible for it, the two states do not always coincide.[

One of the attributes defined for psychopathy is "failure to accept responsibility for own actions".

The Declaration of Human Duties and Responsibilities (DHDR) was written for reinforcing the implementation of human rights under the auspices of the UNESCO and the interest of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights and was proclaimed in 1998 "to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights"(UDHR) in the city of Valencia. Therefore, it is also known as the Valencia Declaration.

Considering that the major challenge for this new century is the effective and efficient realisation of human rights for all people, and that at the same time is needed that all members of the human family strive for its fulfilment, the DHDR formulates related duties and responsibilities for our current interdependence. Its preamble states categorically: The effective enjoyment and implementation of human rights and fundamental freedoms is inextricably linked to the assumption of the duties and responsibilities implicit in those rights.....

 

[bluemoves01]

Shocked

I cant believe he spent time writing it all.

You should get out more.

 

[DSpeeGal]

I cant believe he spent time writing it all.

You should get out more.

Di you feel good with your head in sand

 

[phrodeau]

The Malicious Communications Act of 1988 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_Communications_Act_1988 makes what she did a crime.

It makes no difference if it's unconstitutional, because the UK doesn't have one.

 

[Mike_Yates]

A little more than 10 years later, I still would have been in jail for having made fun of special education students.

 

[bluemoves01]

Di you feel good with your head in sand

YESSSSS

 

[Oh_That_Guy]

1. She is not a star, i have never heard of her.

2. The story was in the Mail ( gutter press) never believe anything they write.

The story is real and in plenty of other news sources besides the Mail.
Just because you've never heard of someone doesn't mean they aren't a star or used to be one. She is a former star of the show. Nobody but you disputes that.

 

[Hard_Rom]

The Malicious Communications Act of 1988 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_Communications_Act_1988 makes what she did a crime.

It makes no difference if it's unconstitutional, because the UK doesn't have one.

Still a law enacted by a duly democratically elected popular government. Some people are just sore losers.

Constitutions are like "Under New Management" signs over shops. An old family business run by original proprietor's descendants don't need to rebrand. If the product speaks for itself. In this case freedom, equality and democracy.

 

[DSpeeGal]

meanwhile

a British "Judge" just freed 3 Mossefucks who were accused of RUNNING DOWN and BEATING another in an attempt at HONOR KILLING

 

[Pairaclities]

The right to freedom of expression is recognized as a human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 19 of the ICCPR states that "everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference" and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice".

Article 19 additionally states that the exercise of these rights carries "special duties and responsibilities" and may "therefore be subject to certain restrictions" when necessary "[f]or respect of the rights or reputation of others" or "[f]or the protection of national security or of public order (order public), or of public health or morals".

In philosophy, moral responsibility is the status of morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or omission, in accordance with one's moral obligations.[1][2] Deciding what (if anything) counts as "morally obligatory" is a principal concern of ethics.

Philosophers refer to people who have moral responsibility for an action as moral agents. Agents have the capability to reflect on their situation, to form intentions about how they will act, and then to carry out that action. The notion of free will has become an important issue in the debate on whether individuals are ever morally responsible for their actions and, if so, in what sense. Incompatibilists regard determinism as at odds with free will, whereas compatibilists think the two can coexist.

Moral responsibility does not necessarily equate to legal responsibility. A person is legally responsible for an event when a legal system is liable to penalise that person for that event. Although it may often be the case that when a person is morally responsible for an act, they are also legally responsible for it, the two states do not always coincide.[

One of the attributes defined for psychopathy is "failure to accept responsibility for own actions".

The Declaration of Human Duties and Responsibilities (DHDR) was written for reinforcing the implementation of human rights under the auspices of the UNESCO and the interest of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights and was proclaimed in 1998 "to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights"(UDHR) in the city of Valencia. Therefore, it is also known as the Valencia Declaration.

Considering that the major challenge for this new century is the effective and efficient realisation of human rights for all people, and that at the same time is needed that all members of the human family strive for its fulfilment, the DHDR formulates related duties and responsibilities for our current interdependence. Its preamble states categorically: The effective enjoyment and implementation of human rights and fundamental freedoms is inextricably linked to the assumption of the duties and responsibilities implicit in those rights.....

Contrary to what Turdeau would have you believe, the UN has its collective heads up its ass.

 

[Hard_Rom]

Contrary to what Turdeau would have you believe, the UN has its collective heads up its ass.

Probably why it is headquartered in the US! That way the UN won't stand out in the crowd.

 

[smoothg103rd]

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. That's isn't right. You shouldn't face jail or down state time for speaking your mind. It should be your actions that place you in jail, not your words.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

...

She should have just called for them to be aborted, which would have made her a hero and provided a major career boost.
...

This.