Christians fined for NOT baking cake! Muslims awarded for NOT delivering beer

Not really, but lets pretend you did.
What's your solution, force people to sue a business? :rolleyes:
If it's such a big deal for you, why don't you go ask a Muslim bakery to bake you a cake for your same sex marriage and then sue them if they refuse? Of course, that would then show they are treated the same under the law and you'd have to find something else to be indignant about.
 
Not really, but lets pretend you did.
.

not really?

:cool:

yes, teh MSM should send undercover peeps to Muslim bakers etc

YES

and then SUE

they wont, we know why



after 9/11, NBC sent MUSLIMS to NASCAR events....they DIDNT send WHITE GUYS to MOSQUES.....
 
not really?
Correct, you sent a google search, not proof that no Muslim bakery has ever been sued.
I know it's a difficult concept for you, as proven in one of your Planned Parenthood tirades, but you can't prove a negative via a google search.
That's why you haven't documented PP ever saying they don't take money for fetal tissue.

yes, teh MSM should send undercover peeps to Muslim bakers etc

YES

and then SUE

they wont, we know why
Probably the same reason your moonbat media hasn't sued, they know they'd win the case and so you couldn't be outraged anymore about it.



after 9/11, NBC sent MUSLIMS to NASCAR events....they DIDNT send WHITE GUYS to MOSQUES.....
Why would they? White people very likely already go to mosques since 30% of american muslims are white.
http://www.people-press.org/2011/08/30/section-1-a-demographic-portrait-of-muslim-americans/

It's kinda funny your outrage over media sending muslims to NASCAR since that's the exact same tactic used my your moonbat media regarding same sex marriage and muslim bakeries.
 
Last edited:
So, now that the deliver boys don't have to deliver alcohol. can the trucking company advertise for truck drivers and specify, no Muslims need apply
They can say "people averse to carrying alcohol need not apply", thus extending the group to include Mormons.
 
Correct, you sent a google search, not proof that no Muslim bakery has ever been sued.
I know it's a difficult concept for you, as proven in one of your Planned Parenthood tirades, but you can't prove a negative via a google search.
That's why you haven't documented PP ever saying they don't take money for fetal tissue.

Probably the same reason your moonbat media hasn't sued, they know they'd win the case and so you couldn't be outraged anymore about it.



Why would they? White people very likely already go to mosques since 30% of american muslims are white.
http://www.people-press.org/2011/08/30/section-1-a-demographic-portrait-of-muslim-americans/

It's kinda funny your outrage over media sending muslims to NASCAR since that's the exact same tactic used my your moonbat media regarding same sex marriage and muslim bakeries.

there were vids there of MUSLIM bakers refusing to BAKE CAKES

but you dont watch VIDS,
 
there were vids there of MUSLIM bakers refusing to BAKE CAKES

but you dont watch VIDS,

So stop pussying around on the GB and go out in the real world and file suit. Fuck's sake... bitch and moan bitch and moan. If you are that outraged be a man of action and do something!
 
So stop pussying around on the GB and go out in the real world and file suit. Fuck's sake... bitch and moan bitch and moan. If you are that outraged be a man of action and do something!

Sharia Savage cant wait to BEHEAD many
 
The multiculturalists will only fight the iSlammers once they have reached the majority at which time the iSlammers will force them to submit, pay special taxes, or die...

;)

By that time, the Christians will be in martyr mode and will look the other way in exactly the same manner the multiculturalists are looking the other way in the Middle East and Africa where the iSlammers are culling the population of the peoples of the Book. And that's how they deal with people that they profess to share a common bond with!

:eek: :eek: :eek:
 
The Judge, U.S. District Judge James E. Shadid, was appointed by Barack Obama. Need I say more?

Demands for accommodation result in ….more demands. Take for example, the Heinz company. Heinz has bent over backwards to accommodate these Muslim workers: they have prayer rooms, prayer times, etc. They just don’t want them leaving work to pray outside of scheduled break times. Mind you, they could easily pray before or after work, but no. This imposes Islam on everyone else. Now Muslim workers are suing Heinz, demanding to be allowed to say prayers in the workplace at the time of day specified by their religion.

And Hertz. Hertz has been exceedingly generous to their Muslim workers. And the Muslim response has been this endless war of litigation and attrition. Hertz provided prayer rooms, rugs and prayer break times. Not good enough. Back in 2011, I reported that Hertz had was forced to suspend 35 Muslim workers because they were abusing their extra special “prayer break times” and refusing to clock out when praying. There was no way of knowing when their Muslim workers returned from their lengthy prayer breaks — five times a day. Muslim workers officially filed a lawsuit against the Hertz rental car company. –

You’ll notice, big companies are always targeted. Hertz, Heinz, Target, Wal-Mart, Disney, etc. Why? To set precedents.
 
Muslim cabbies turning away passengers with seeing-eye dogs


Anywhere Western law and mores and sharia law and traditions conflict, it’s Western law that must give way.

You’re blind? Too bad. Respect Islam. Got it? And the West says, “Yes, massa.”

Even the lily-livered writer of the article adheres to the sharia (Islamic law) and doesn’t mention or criticize the motive for the dog-hate: Islam



http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/1...y-passengers-with-seeing-eye-dogs/#more-53444
 
Interesting that the complainant (Kaye Leslie) didn't mention the ethnicity or religion of those who turned her down,
yet the author of the article starts with some bizarre ramblings about muslims and the Quran.

And even so, how would one be able to tell one's religion from a simple "Hello. Sorry but no dogs allowed, mam."

EDIT.
dcc.clothesline?
 
did I say they were:cool:
I can only assume you think they are the same since you said there were videos of them refusing in response to my statement that you didn't provide any proof they'd been sued.

AA: Show me proof no muslim bakery has been sued for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a same sex marriage
HB: I showed you videos of them refusing to bake a cake!

Or is a conversation with you more like this?
AA:What time is it?
HB:Oak tree.
 
Interesting that the complainant (Kaye Leslie) didn't mention the ethnicity or religion of those who turned her down,
yet the author of the article starts with some bizarre ramblings about muslims and the Quran.

And even so, how would one be able to tell one's religion from a simple "Hello. Sorry but no dogs allowed, mam."
In the US no business can legally turn away anyone using a guide dog. If you're operating a business you're required to allow guide dogs to come in if you allow people to come in.

To prevent it it may require a lawsuit, like suing the cab company. Unfortunately a sighted person would have to help, since a blind person wouldn't be able to get the cab number.
 
In the US no business can legally turn away anyone using a guide dog. If you're operating a business you're required to allow guide dogs to come in if you allow people to come in.

To prevent it it may require a lawsuit, like suing the cab company. Unfortunately a sighted person would have to help, since a blind person wouldn't be able to get the cab number.

And it was in Canada.

BB spans the globe looking for reasons to be outraged.
 
Back
Top