If you were raped in India by a woman and she was never arrested, THANK A FEMINIST

[LJ_Reloaded]

There is one and only one reason why women are never punished for committing rape in India:

FEMINISM

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...er-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms

NEW DELHI: "Gender just, gender sensitive and not gender neutral rape laws," is what women's groups, human rights groups and activists are demanding. The appeal gains significance as it comes at a time when the 2013 Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance and the report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee are set to come up for debate in Parliament.

The women's groups and human rights bodies want "all parties aligned with women's rights to ensure that laws made in the wake of the brutal Delhi gang-rape case do not leave women even more vulnerable than they already are".

"The report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on the 2012 Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill as well as the 2013 Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance not only violates the letter and spirit of the Justice Verma Committee (JVC) recommendations but endangers and deepens women's vulnerability in this country," said representatives of women's groups preparing to raise the issue nationwide to create awareness on the lacunae in the law.

On the International Women's Day, to be observed on Friday, activists from voluntary organizations like Jagori, Saheli, Nirantar, Women Against Sexual Violence, Lawyers Collective, State Repression Forum Against Oppression of Women, Mumbai; and Madhya Pradesh Mahila Manch, Indore propose to raise the issue in one voice. Several legal luminaries are also expected to join the chorus.

 

[badbabysitter]

Section 377 bars rape from being gender neutral




in order for men to be considered victims of sexual assault, the law would have to acknowledge that sex can actually occur between men... which it does not

I don't know how many times this has to be explained to you


also the ordinance allowed the perpetrator of an offense to press charges against the victim... I still dont get how you think that was a good idea

 

[bronzeage]

Section 377 bars rape from being gender neutral




in order for men to be considered victims of sexual assault, the law would have to acknowledge that sex can actually occur between men... which it does not

I don't know how many times this has to be explained to you


also the ordinance allowed the perpetrator of an offense to press charges against the victim... I still dont get how you think that was a good idea

Being raped by a man or a woman has always been one of his special fantasies.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Section 377 bars rape from being gender neutral




in order for men to be considered victims of sexual assault, the law would have to acknowledge that sex can actually occur between men... which it does not

This is about women raping men. This is not about men & men, it's about women raping men

I don't know how many times this has to be explained to you

I don't know how many times this has to be explained to you: women cannot be prosecuted for rape in India.

What part of that do you not understand?

 

[badbabysitter]

This is about women raping men. This is not about men & men, it's about women raping men


I don't know how many times this has to be explained to you: women cannot be prosecuted for rape in India.

What part of that do you not understand?

You still don't get it

Section 377 covers sex crimes against men

each and every time it's been attempted to be repealed, it's been down voted

until the Section is repealed the gender laws can not be neutral

because as it is... Section 377 is the source of why there are two sets of laws

if the section is stripped..it will then allow 375 and 376 to be made neutral


screaming about feminism will not change this

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

You still don't get it

Section 377 covers sex crimes against men

each and every time it's been attempted to be repealed, it's been down voted

until the Section is repealed the gender laws can not be neutral

because as it is... Section 377 is the source of why there are two sets of laws

if the section is stripped..it will then allow 375 and 376 to be made neutral


screaming about feminism will not change this

Thanks to feminists, women cannot be prosecuted for rape in India.

Please show how this is untrue.

 

[hashtag45]

Thanks to feminists, women cannot be prosecuted for rape in India.
Please show how this is untrue.

You're kidding, right?
You know I relate -partially- to some of your experiences,
given that, where I live now (and not at all like back home) I encountered more bitches than I encountered jerks.

But how can you Even Think of choosing India as an example?
Given all those horrific cases of gangrape/homicide… Moreover, mysogynism is rife there, as I've been told.
.

 

[Adre]

I keep looking for the opportunity.

 

[hashtag45]

I keep looking for the opportunity.

lol..
best counterpunch for this thread

 

[badbabysitter]

Thanks to feminists, women cannot be prosecuted for rape in India.

Please show how this is untrue.

I just did

section 377 is the reason why

once it is repealled, the law can become neutral

it has literally nothing to do with feminism

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I just did

section 377 is the reason why

once it is repealled, the law can become neutral

it has literally nothing to do with feminism

Feminists fought for and prevented the law that said women who rape could be charged. Why do you keep denying this, when it has been clearly documented?

Lawyer, Seema Mishra pointed out that one pernicious provision of the Ordinance 2013, upheld by the Committee report is blanket gender neutrality of the perpetrator of sexual harassment, assault and rape. "Put simply: unlike in existing law where the accused is male, the Committee recommendations if enacted into a proposed new Bill, will make it possible for women to be charged with these offences. This is wholly unacceptable," she said.

Lawyer, Seema Mishra pointed out that one pernicious provision of the Ordinance 2013, upheld by the Committee report is blanket gender neutrality of the perpetrator of sexual harassment, assault and rape.

Do you deny that feminists oppose gender neutrality in rape laws?

I mean, it's right there in black and white.

Do you deny that feminists declared gender neutrality in rape cases to be PERNICIOUS?

 

[badbabysitter]

Feminists fought for and prevented the law that said women who rape could be charged. Why do you keep denying this, when it has been clearly documented?

because that would then create two different sets of laws for men for the same crime...


which is by the by...illegal according to Indian criminal code

which means if a man was caught on video raping a woman, confessed to a crowd on live tv raping her, and wrote a handwritten notarized letter with every detail of the crime... he would be acquited


why?


because you cant try a person for the same crime twice


and by making 375 and 376 whilst keeping 377 specifically about men... it would mean women would be neutralized as a gender and men would not


you want women to be tried for raping men...then fight 377


but the reason why you don't want to fight 377 is because fighting it would stop making homosexuality a crime.. and the MRA isnt interested in men that aren't straight

 

[badbabysitter]

you keep denying this, when it has been clearly documented?


Lawyer, Seema Mishra pointed out that one pernicious provision of the Ordinance 2013, upheld by the Committee report is blanket gender neutrality of the perpetrator of sexual harassment, assault and rape.

Do you deny that feminists oppose gender neutrality in rape laws?

I mean, it's right there in black and white.

Do you deny that feminists declared gender neutrality in rape cases to be PERNICIOUS?

the ordinance does not imply to section 377

this was explained to you in another thread

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1049891&highlight=ordinance


why are you so opposed to getting rid of section 377 so that men can be recognized as victims of sexual assault

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

the ordinance does not imply to section 377

this was explained to you in another thread

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1049891&highlight=ordinance


why are you so opposed to getting rid of section 377 so that men can be recognized as victims of sexual assault

Eliminating section 377 will not allow women to be prosecuted for rape. You have never refuted that.

Feminists fought for and prevented the law that said women who rape could be charged. Why do you keep denying this, when it has been clearly documented?

Lawyer, Seema Mishra pointed out that one pernicious provision of the Ordinance 2013, upheld by the Committee report is blanket gender neutrality of the perpetrator of sexual harassment, assault and rape. "Put simply: unlike in existing law where the accused is male, the Committee recommendations if enacted into a proposed new Bill, will make it possible for women to be charged with these offences. This is wholly unacceptable," she said.

Lawyer, Seema Mishra pointed out that one pernicious provision of the Ordinance 2013, upheld by the Committee report is blanket gender neutrality of the perpetrator of sexual harassment, assault and rape.

Do you deny that feminists oppose gender neutrality in rape laws?

I mean, it's right there in black and white.

Do you deny that feminists declared gender neutrality in rape cases to be PERNICIOUS?

 

[badbabysitter]

Eliminating section 377 will not allow women to be prosecuted for rape. You have never refuted that.

that doesnt even make sense...if you eliminate 377.. you can then make laws that would allow women to be prosecuted

you're asking me to refute something that I've actually been on record supporting

Feminists fought for and prevented the law that said women who rape could be charged.

they fought changes to 375 and 376 which deal with women... they cant fight changes to 377 because it hasnt been repealled

Why do you keep denying this, when it has been clearly documented?

It has been clearly documented.. under the current laws section 377 oprevents women from being charged... no matter how much you scream about feminism

Lawyer, Seema Mishra pointed out that one pernicious provision of the Ordinance 2013, upheld by the Committee report is blanket gender neutrality of the perpetrator of sexual harassment, assault and rape.

Do you deny that feminists oppose gender neutrality in rape laws?

yes, because 377 doesnt allow gender neutrality... get rid of 377 and you finally get what you're screaming about... you can make 375 and 376 as gender nuetral as you want... it wont change that men wont be considered victims of rape until 377 is changed

I mean, it's right there in black and white.

so is 377.. which you continue to ignore.. you seem to think that a law preventing women from being charged shouldnt be abolished.. and then complain that it isnt being changed

Do you deny that feminists declared gender neutrality in rape cases to be PERNICIOUS?

when it comes to 375 and 376, it absolutely is... because 377 doesnt allow women to be charged....


yelling wont change that you're ignoring the one true obstacle to equal treatment under the law

 

[hashtag45]

what do all these have to do with India?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

that doesnt even make sense...if you eliminate 377.. you can then make laws that would allow women to be prosecuted

No you can't, because feminists oppose such laws. I mean, it's right there in the OP in fucking black and white.

377 or not, you can still make laws that are gender-neutral about rape. You act like 377 supercedes life, the universe and everything in India.

The problem here is FEMINISTS FOUGHT GENDER NEUTRAL RAPE LAWS - which would have superceded whatever horrors you assert exist in 377.