The "Switching" Gene

4est_4est_Gump

Run Forrest! RUN!
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Posts
89,007
Women are more likely to have lesbian sex when they can't have sex with men, an authoritative study authored by Elizabeth McClintock, of the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, finds.

Dr McClintock said that women may be less likely to experiment with bisexuality when they find it particularly easy to find a male partner.

She said: ‘Women who are initially successful in partnering with men, as is more traditionally expected, may never explore their attraction to other women.

‘However, women with the same sexual attractions, but less favourable heterosexual options may have greater opportunity to experiment with same-sex partners.’
...

The study also discovered that less attractive women are more likely to become lesbians. At this point, you probably think I'm making this up, don't you? But no:

... her analysis showed that attractive women were more likely to think of themselves as purely heterosexual.

If true, do you think a makeover could help convince women that they are heterosexual?

The study talked about women who switched back and forth in their sexual orientation, much like a tennis player switching from backhand to forehand....
NewsMachete


http://www.americanthinker.com/blog..._due_to_lack_of_boyfriends.html#ixzz3k13fhtiZ


Does this apply to the wife of Mayor De Blasio?
 
wtf? Such a derrogatory article. And written by a woman ?!?
haven't crossed to the other side, but I met quite a few (and some were v. attractive, as per my male colleagues).
It seemed to me that it was all a matter of preference or, in some cases, the opposite to what's written - because they had bad experiences with assholes
 
:cool:


Scholarly peer-reviewed research!

:mad:

Just like Glow Ball Warning!

Are you a denier? Do you hate "Science?"





;) ;) [But of course it's not a choice!]
 
wtf? Such a derrogatory article. And written by a woman ?!?
haven't crossed to the other side, but I met quite a few (and some were v. attractive, as per my male colleagues).
It seemed to me that it was all a matter of preference or, in some cases, the opposite to what's written - because they had bad experiences with assholes

Israeli perfessers researched lesbians and concluded female sexual expression is adaptive. Females have no bio factors that predispose them to hetero or homosexual interactions.
 
Israeli perfessers researched lesbians and concluded female sexual expression is adaptive. Females have no bio factors that predispose them to hetero or homosexual interactions.

How did they do that? Doesn't make sense to me. I mean, it wouldn't show up on an MRI etc and there are no biological markers
And what about their male counterparts?
 
Some men will fuck anything with a hole including sheep, chickens and well-sanded holes in a wall...

;) ;)

Think variations on a theme.



:D
 
How did they do that? Doesn't make sense to me. I mean, it wouldn't show up on an MRI etc and there are no biological markers
And what about their male counterparts?

The human prototype is female, males evolved for genetic diversity. Fetal males become 'male' because of androgen hormone sensitivity. Genetic flaws that create testosterone insensitivity predispose males to develop 'female.' A real genetic female conforms to her natural female development. Nothing biologic steers her to favor female sexual partners, genetic males need testosterone to guide sexuality.
 
...

For a half-century, the engine of diversity preference and affirmative action has been fueled by physically identifiable racial identity — one-drop rules just as reactionary and exclusionary as those of the Old Confederacy. Race was supposedly easily ascertainable, even still in our increasingly intermarried and assimilated society.

The DNA-derived color of one’s skin — not the content of one’s character — usually alone qualified one for affirmative action. If Shaun King or Rachel Dolezal can become black simply by asserting that they are black, are they then eligible for special minority advantages?

That notion is neither idle speculation nor conservative cynicism. King, for example, received an Oprah Winfrey minority scholarship at Morehouse College. Had he been seen as biologically white, he would never have been frequently interviewed on cable television as a national black leader.

Being white and male supposedly means enjoying innate and undeserved privilege. But now trans-elites reinvent themselves as females or minorities and have access to special advantages or privileges.

We are still fighting the old battle between nature and culture.

Our 21st-century postmodern culture says that we can become whatever we declare ourselves to be. But age-old realities suggest that only nature determines our gender and race.

How odd that progressives publicly insist that we can be what we wish to be, but privately accept the ancient wisdom that we really cannot quite do that — at least not without dropping the accepted criteria for social institutions such as racially based scholarships, female sports programs, or affirmative action for women and minorities.
Victor Davis Hanson, NRO

The Honor Roll

Ward Churchill
Elizabeth Warren
Rachael Dolezal
Shaun King
Richard Raskind (Renée Richards)
Bruce Jenner
 
Back
Top