75% of lesbians are obese

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
A fucking taxpayer funded study asserts that 75% of lesbians are obese, and tries to find out why. And that's just the tip of the stupidity iceberg.

I want my fucking money back. I can't say what I REALLY want to see happen to the idiots who assert that 75% of lesbians are fat - to say nothing of the other crap in this so-called "study" - because I'd in on my way to Club Fed by fucking morning.

But I fucking want my taxpayer money back and I want it back now.

On the other hand Republicans are in a huge quandry here. Do they want to cut government funding for this or are they all googly-eyed over the outright defamations hurled at gay women?

http://freebeacon.com/issues/taxpay...5-million-to-find-out-why-lesbians-are-obese/

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has now spent over $3.5 million to determine why the majority of lesbians are obese.

The project, now entering its fifth year, received another grant worth $658,485 this summer. The total funding for the research is now $3,531,925. Funding has more than doubled since the study was first revealed in 2013.

Since, the study that is examining why three-quarters of lesbians are obese, but gay men are not, has survived sequester cuts, and continues to produce results such as the discovery that gay men have a “greater desire for toned muscles” than straight men.

Another scientific paper associated with the research concluded that lesbians have lower “athletic-self esteem” that may lead to higher rates of obesity.

A paper published this June coauthored by the project’s lead investigator, S. Bryn Austin, an associate epidemiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and pediatrics professor at Harvard Medical School, found that young males think about their muscles.

“Latent transition analyses revealed that sexual minority males (i.e., mostly heterosexual, gay, and bisexual) were more likely than completely heterosexual males to be lean-concerned at ages 17-18 and 19-20 years and to transition to the lean-concerned class from the healthy class,” according to the paper. “There were no sexual orientation differences in odds of being muscle-concerned.”

The paper also suggested that young men should be “screened” to see if they are too preoccupied with their biceps.
 
They aren't "asserting" that, as you put it, "lesbians are fat." They are not even looking to "determine if "lesbians are fat." The fact that the majority of lesbians are was already known. You know, weigh a bunch of lesbians at the Doctor's office, write it down, make a little graph...

They are looking to determine if there are some preventable reason why that many are obese. I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that for any number of reasons, they are eating too many of the wrong kinds of calories and engaging in too little exercise.

On the other hand when I was young and skinny, I was working on an ironworking crew. One of the guys assured me the way to put o weight was to eat lots of pussy and drink a lot of beer.
 
They aren't "asserting" that, as you put it, "lesbians are fat." They are not even looking to "determine if "lesbians are fat." The fact that the majority of lesbians are was already known. You know, weigh a bunch of lesbians at the Doctor's office, write it down, make a little graph...
That's bullshit through and through. Nobody knows how many lesbians are fat. Moreover? It's irrelevant to life, the universe and everything. Except to homophobic shitheads.
 
Seeing Obesity is way up across the board in the US it just seems like someoen trying to single out a demographic.

Why are we obese as a society? Look at the little box we're all looking at right now. Many people work on one all day then come home and are glued to it.

Kids no longer play games or go outside, there are apps for those things.

Fast food and the internet= obese and lazy
 
Seeing Obesity is way up across the board in the US it just seems like someoen trying to single out a demographic.

Why are we obese as a society? Look at the little box we're all looking at right now. Many people work on one all day then come home and are glued to it.

Kids no longer play games or go outside, there are apps for those things.

Fast food and the internet= obese and lazy
Don't tell me that you of all people on here even lend a SHRED of credibility to the idea that THREE OUT OF EVERY FOUR LESBIANS ARE OBESE?!!!!!!!!!!

That's way above the population at large, which is like what, 55-60% worst case scenario?

75 percent is not just bullshit, it's not just overexaggeration, it's not just poor statistical data gathering technique, it's malicious homophobic misogynist propaganda. You of all people should have sunk your teeth into this nonsense "statistic" before I did.
 
No I don't believe its credible at all. I think its a witch hunt and someone trying to back an agenda. I also already saw this. JBJ referenced the same article in the AH
 
No I don't believe its credible at all. I think its a witch hunt and someone trying to back an agenda. I also already saw this. JBJ referenced the same article in the AH
I wouldn't have known, I don't read that racist fucktard's stuff.

Now this shit tends to seriously annoy me but the fact that taxpayers are funding this shit put an actual letter in the mail this morning to my rep. People are too busy watching Jersey Shore to give a shit.
 
I wouldn't have known, I don't read that racist fucktard's stuff.

Now this shit tends to seriously annoy me but the fact that taxpayers are funding this shit put an actual letter in the mail this morning to my rep. People are too busy watching Jersey Shore to give a shit.

^^^^^Not the other white meat.
 
That's bullshit through and through. Nobody knows how many lesbians are fat. Moreover? It's irrelevant to life, the universe and everything. Except to homophobic shitheads.

By your specious reasoning, no one knows anything about anything unless they take a data sample of the entire population down to the very last person in the most remote, obscure census tract. There is this thing called mathematics. Mathematics, properly applied, is never wrong. In mathematics there are people such as actuaries that employ statistical analysis. Any sample population can be accurately said to represent the whole within the margin of error.

As to whether it is irrelevant to life? Not if you consider it in the metaphysical sense in that death is a part of the circle of life. Obesity leads to a host of issues for the individual up to and including diseases that cause death. Increasingly as we get the public involved in financing personal health issues it is a public health matter. Which is why the GOVERNMENT (that you love) is spending the money (which you actually don't care about) through the National Institute of HEALTH to see if they can find ways to interdict this actual public health problem in that particular subset of the population. As a good little socialist you should love government telling the collective what to eat and when to show up for indoctrination and exercise.
 
I wouldn't have known, I don't read that racist fucktard's stuff.

Now this shit tends to seriously annoy me but the fact that taxpayers are funding this shit put an actual letter in the mail this morning to my rep. People are too busy watching Jersey Shore to give a shit.

I agree....except its facebook and twitter in my opinion that is the demise of people caring about anything other than celebrities and liking posts.

One of the reps here Jack Reed is very good. My wife wrote him a long letter about how RI is only one of two atwill states(meaning employees have no rights, you could work a job for 25 years and they can fire you without cause then the corrupt unemployment system tries to deny your benefits)

At the time she was on her third adjudication to get money she was eligible for and they were still playing games.

A week later she received a phone call from his office asking all the details and a week after that she received the $5900.00 the state owed her.

Some of them do their job.
 
Don't tell me that you of all people on here even lend a SHRED of credibility to the idea that THREE OUT OF EVERY FOUR LESBIANS ARE OBESE?!!!!!!!!!!

That's way above the population at large, which is like what, 55-60% worst case scenario?

75 percent is not just bullshit, it's not just overexaggeration, it's not just poor statistical data gathering technique, it's malicious homophobic misogynist propaganda. You of all people should have sunk your teeth into this nonsense "statistic" before I did.
Speaking of bullshit: You see a study done by the very same government full of alphabet agencies that you love having peer into and manage every aspect of our lives and you are "sure" that the data...actual data gathered...is wrong in favor of your own anecdotal observations. Maybe you watch a LOT of girl-on-girl porn. That is not a valid statistical sample. Not a better "statistical gathering technique."

So you buy 1 out of 2, maybe 2 out of 3, but not 3 out of 4? I guess 1/2 the country needing care for entirely preventable diseases is just dandy for the future single payer system to be burdened with. Healthcare costs what it does in America because the majority of Americans are unhealthy including rampant obesity.

As a "men's rights" nutcase how can you believe that lesbians (who are all women in case you have not noticed) are going to be actively campaigned against by the US Government? I am pretty sure there are plenty of them working at the NIH. Plenty of supporters as well. Yes this is agenda driven but why would this one study have some agenda to go against the grain of society at large, and current government leanings? This is about money, as it always is. Specifically (and I am astounded you didn't jump to the more obvious conclusion) that when one is apportioning gov't money to uplift and support the GLBT community, no need to waste money on the boys, they will become gym rats on their own, spend it on girls.

This will also trickle down to Title IX findings. It is not enough that boys sports generate all of the revenue that supports girls sports, we now need to insist that even more money be spent on girls sports in the interest of the public good. Because one can never tell which of the girls are going to end up as an obese lesbian.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of bullshit: You see a study done by the very same government full of alphabet agencies that you love having peer into and manage every aspect of our lives and you are "sure" that the data...actual data gathered...is wrong in favor of your own anecdotal observations. Maybe you watch a LOT of girl-on-girl porn. That is not a valid statistical sample. Not a better "statistical gathering technique."

So you buy 1 out of 2, maybe 2 out of 3, but not 3 out of 4? I guess 1/2 the country needing care for entirely preventable diseases is just dandy for the future single payer system to be burdened with. Healthcare costs what it does in America because the majority of Americans are unhealthy including rampant obesity.
And you have the nerve to call me a nutcase after this rabid frothjob you posted here? :eek:

As a "men's rights" nutcase how can you believe that lesbians (who are all women in case you have not noticed) are going to be actively campaigned against by the US Government? I am pretty sure there are plenty of them working at the NIH. Plenty of supporters as well. Yes this is agenda driven but why would this one study have some agenda to go against the grain of society at large, and current government leanings? This is about money, as it always is. Specifically (and I am astounded you didn't jump to the more obvious conclusion) that when one is apportioning gov't money to uplift and support the GLBT community, no need to waste money on the boys, they will become gym rats on their own, spend it on girls.

This will also trickle down to Title IX findings. It is not enough that boys sports generate all of the revenue that supports girls sports, we now need to insist that even more money be spent on girls sports in the interest of the public good. Because one can never tell which of the girls are going to end up as an obese lesbian.
Yes, it occurred to me that this statistical bullshit hackjob they did on lesbians might translate into Title IX whackadoodlery and other forms of misandry. That's because the feminists are right on one thing - misogyny also hurts men. (What they do not understand is that misandry very much hurts women.)
 
The reason why lesbians have a higher obesity rate than heterosexual women is because 80% of lesbians have polycystic ovaries. They have polycystic ovaries because they have excess androgen... which is why they are lesbians in the first place.
 
The reason why lesbians have a higher obesity rate than heterosexual women is because 80% of lesbians have polycystic ovaries. They have polycystic ovaries because they have excess androgen... which is why they are lesbians in the first place.

I don't know about the conclusion you come to in your last sentence, but I went looking to debunk your claims and found they are supported. Wow. I had no idea about this. Thanks for posting that.

https://www.pcos.com/pcos-and-lesbians/
 
And you have the nerve to call me a nutcase after this rabid frothjob you posted here? :eek:


Yes, it occurred to me that this statistical bullshit hackjob they did on lesbians might translate into Title IX whackadoodlery and other forms of misandry. That's because the feminists are right on one thing - misogyny also hurts men. (What they do not understand is that misandry very much hurts women.)

Finally! Something we can agree on.
 
The reason why lesbians have a higher obesity rate than heterosexual women is because 80% of lesbians have polycystic ovaries. They have polycystic ovaries because they have excess androgen... which is why they are lesbians in the first place.
First of all, how the hell do we know how many lesbians there really are?

Does someone have the power to call on God to slap a pink triangle on them at birth or something?

That alone undermines the credibility of all of these studies.
 
First of all, how the hell do we know how many lesbians there really are?

Does someone have the power to call on God to slap a pink triangle on them at birth or something?

That alone undermines the credibility of all of these studies.

According to Dr. Funk check their androgen levels.
 
First of all, how the hell do we know how many lesbians there really are?

Does someone have the power to call on God to slap a pink triangle on them at birth or something?

That alone undermines the credibility of all of these studies.

The sample size was only 618... That's not high enough to correlate to the entire population.

Of the 618 women, 80% of those who said they were lesbian had this condition. It's interesting, but the sample size is too small.

Here's a screenshot from the link I posted earlier:

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    54.6 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
First of all, how the hell do we know how many lesbians there really are?

Does someone have the power to call on God to slap a pink triangle on them at birth or something?

That alone undermines the credibility of all of these studies.

The only ones one can study/assist/talk to are the ones that openly declare their orientation. These and all other studies of gay people are speaking of those that are known to the researcher to be gay because the person declares themselves to be. Obviously.

I suppose someone should study how often lesbians lie in surveys. Some lie and say they are? Can't really quantify the ones that lie and say they aren't.
 
The sample size was only 618... That's not high enough to correlate to the entire population.

Of the 618 women, 80% of those who said they were lesbian had this condition. It's interesting, but the sample size is too small.

Here's a screenshot from the link I posted earlier:

attachment.php
The sample size was only 618... That's not high enough to correlate to the entire population.

This needs to be put up on a billboard because otherwise the sheeple won't notice that.
 
Back
Top