In this thread, merrily post with me

Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily,
Life is but a dream!

"Carnally cybering" seems and oxymoron, btw.

Actually...

...the Sex Offender freely admitted to carnally cybering with a minor, intentionally, knowing, in fact, he was a minor at the time.

Are you actually offering yourself to the list by so flippantly disregarding that fact...

...just so you can continue to post merrily with the Sex Offender and/or her Supporters/Enablers?


*********************

Crimes of Passion thread original post #9 deleted here...

...but imaged for posterity here:

There was a guy I knew on the internet when I was in my 20s. Good gamer, tough talker, smart and funny. Ran a BDSM bondage sideline of cyber. The kinda guy that who when someone was threatening to come to my house and rape me, would say "Hah. Tell him you don't think he could get you off."

He had a cover story that he was in his 30s but had confessed to one nice lady that he was only 1* or so at the time. He and I became involved online and although I knew he how old he was, he didn't confess it for a few months, after which time I just said "Yes, I know."

I did get to meet him when his family traveled near to where I live, we met and fooled around a bit in the front seat of a car. I think he was 1* at the time.

Seriously, I couldn't have corrupted this guy, if anything I rehabilitated him.

- "Carnal involvement with a minor, I imagine, in my case."

- "Mid to late 20s if I recall correctly."

- "Well, he was one of the guys I was messing around with at the same time, probably one in six."

- "I had a roleplay relationship with him"

- "...was it still outside of what is considered lawful? Yes."

- "Do I think I could have been charged with a crime? Yep."

- "If my daughter or son had a relationship with a person that much older, would I freak out? Hell yes."
 
Actually...

...the Sex Offender freely admitted to carnally cybering with a minor, intentionally, knowing, in fact, he was a minor at the time.

Are you actually offering yourself to the list by so flippantly disregarding that fact...

...just so you can continue to post merrily with the Sex Offender and/or her Supporters/Enablers?


*********************

Crimes of Passion thread original post #9 deleted here...

...but imaged for posterity here:

Dry up, Dursley, you great prune.

I did not. Other than "fool around" that's all you've got. Nowhere does it say I did done none.
 
Actually...

...the Sex Offender freely admitted to carnally cybering with a minor, intentionally, knowing, in fact, he was a minor at the time.

Are you actually offering yourself to the list by so flippantly disregarding that fact...

...just so you can continue to post merrily with the Sex Offender and/or her Supporters/Enablers?


*********************

Crimes of Passion thread original post #9 deleted here...

...but imaged for posterity here:

He better be a second ºer.

By the way, are you still merrily talking with "Grace the ORIGINAL ORIGINAL Sex Offender" outside of Lit?

:)
 
Crimes of Passion thread original post #9 deleted here...

...but imaged for posterity here:

There was a guy I knew on the internet when I was in my 20s. Good gamer, tough talker, smart and funny. Ran a BDSM bondage sideline of cyber. The kinda guy that who when someone was threatening to come to my house and rape me, would say "Hah. Tell him you don't think he could get you off."

He had a cover story that he was in his 30s but had confessed to one nice lady that he was only 1* or so at the time. He and I became involved online and although I knew he how old he was, he didn't confess it for a few months, after which time I just said "Yes, I know."

I did get to meet him when his family traveled near to where I live, we met and fooled around a bit in the front seat of a car. I think he was 1* at the time.

Seriously, I couldn't have corrupted this guy, if anything I rehabilitated him.

- "Carnal involvement with a minor, I imagine, in my case."

- "Mid to late 20s if I recall correctly."

- "Well, he was one of the guys I was messing around with at the same time, probably one in six."

- "I had a roleplay relationship with him"

- "...was it still outside of what is considered lawful? Yes."

- "Do I think I could have been charged with a crime? Yep."

- "If my daughter or son had a relationship with a person that much older, would I freak out? Hell yes."
 

Thanks, Eyer. Good update.

For those who don't know, Eyer merrily posted with Grace the Sex Offender. Here is a quote from the legal evidence against Grace, a text from "Grace" to the 14 year old (she already knew his age):

"I want you to fuck me hard, you make me feel wet, I want you to cum inside me."

So Eyer's expertise on merrily posting with sex offenders is unquestioned.
 
In Eyer's own way, it was merrily. It's like the Grinch's heart ... you just need the Hubble telescope to see it.

Eyer is a pedophile enabler and defender.

He is just picky as to which pedos he talks to.
 
Eyer is a pedophile enabler and defender.

He is just picky as to which pedos he talks to.

You would make a great 2ºer for me. You bring an element that most don't. You should seriously consider it. I want a well rounded team.
 
Thanks, Eyer. Good update.

For those who don't know, Eyer merrily posted with Grace the Sex Offender. Here is a quote from the legal evidence against Grace, a text from "Grace" to the 14 year old (she already knew his age):

"I want you to fuck me hard, you make me feel wet, I want you to cum inside me."

So Eyer's expertise on merrily posting with sex offenders is unquestioned.

So eyer was getting his dick wet with a sex offender himself!!! :eek:

Should we start a thread about it? And post all of his enablers?

People who post and interact with Grace the sex offender:

Eyer

Here is a list of friends and enablers of eyer:








*crickets*
 
Really???

Nope.

But Eyer gleefully posted with Grace in spite of all the evidence he claims he didn't know about ... including what I posted from the evidence above. He claimed ignorance, but it only took a simple search (which Eyer claimed he did) for that evidence to be found.

Thus his claim of ignorance, at least in this situation, is beyond belief. He defended and enabled the pedophile Grace. It's as simple as that.
 
Nope.

But Eyer gleefully posted with Grace in spite of all the evidence he claims he didn't know about ... including what I posted from the evidence above. He claimed ignorance, but it only took a simple search (which Eyer claimed he did) for that evidence to be found.

Thus his claim of ignorance, at least in this situation, is beyond belief. He defended and enabled the pedophile Grace. It's as simple as that.

Are you on probation at all? And I don't know Grace.
 
I should be all upset and deciding that eyer knows something about Pookie that I don't.

Nah.
 
But grace wasn't a vapid blow hard that talked too much and said very little.

Well maybe she was a blow hard... We will have ask eyer
 
Last edited:
Back
Top