IRS confirms illegal aliens can get BACK TAXES, though they never filed and werent in

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
in
the country

EXECUTIVE AMNESTY WITH BENEFITS: The IRS has confirmed to Congress that individuals granted amnesty by President Obama’s unilateral lawmaking ”executive action” will indeed qualify for a refund of back taxes, even if they never filed a tax return:

IRS lawyers have ruled that once illegal immigrants get numbers, they can go back and re-file for up to three previous years’ taxes and claim refunds even for time they were working illegally.

The lawyers said since the EITC is a refundable credit, that’s allowed even when the illegal immigrants worked off-the-books and never paid taxes in the first place.

Terrific–so the President can take executive action that not only transforms individuals whom our law classifies as “deportable” into “not deportable,” he can simultaneously confer upon them multiple benefits, including work permits and now, tax refunds, which will be funded by law-abiding individuals who are present in the country legally.
 
in
the country

EXECUTIVE AMNESTY WITH BENEFITS: The IRS has confirmed to Congress that individuals granted amnesty by President Obama’s unilateral lawmaking ”executive action” will indeed qualify for a refund of back taxes, even if they never filed a tax return:

IRS lawyers have ruled that once illegal immigrants get numbers, they can go back and re-file for up to three previous years’ taxes and claim refunds even for time they were working illegally.

The lawyers said since the EITC is a refundable credit, that’s allowed even when the illegal immigrants worked off-the-books and never paid taxes in the first place.

Terrific–so the President can take executive action that not only transforms individuals whom our law classifies as “deportable” into “not deportable,” he can simultaneously confer upon them multiple benefits, including work permits and now, tax refunds, which will be funded by law-abiding individuals who are present in the country legally.

where's the quote from? Paul Hellyer?
 
What the US needs... and this sounds radical; is some kind of institution in our government tasked with writing laws. These shenanigans wouldn't happen if we had such a "legislative" body.
 
What the US needs... and this sounds radical; is some kind of institution in our government tasked with writing laws. These shenanigans wouldn't happen if we had such a "legislative" body.

we do

Hussein Black Obama signs exec orders....do you NOT read the Oh Pee?

really? Johnny Black Savage?
 
we do

Hussein Black Obama signs exec orders....do you NOT read the Oh Pee?

really? Johnny Black Savage?

Congress should correct that.

I guess they are too busy debating the name of the next post office.



...and we ALL know that if BHO were a Repo (and white), you and your ILK would be blaming Congress, not the Executive. It's all a matter of if your rose colored glasses have red lenses or blue ones.
 
Congress should correct that.

I guess they are too busy debating the name of the next post office.



...and we ALL know that if BHO were a Repo (and white), you and your ILK would be blaming Congress, not the Executive. It's all a matter of if your rose colored glasses have red lenses or blue ones.

I have no ELK.....

and when Congress tries, they are branded EXTREMISTS, HATERS and RACISTS

grow the fuck up, Johnnie Black Savage
 
the BOTTOM line

illegals will now be PAID by the citizens of America!
 
I have no ELK.....

and when Congress tries, they are branded EXTREMISTS, HATERS and RACISTS

grow the fuck up, Johnnie Black Savage

No - Congress refuses to do their jobs because every single member; EVERY single one of them, believes more in their party then they believe in America.

When I become dictator for a day I will pass two Constitutional amendments: term limits and abolishment of political parties.
 
and when I do

I will eliminate 2/3rds of our NUKE STOCK PILE
 
Congress cant act

FUNDING FOR IMMIGRATION LAWSUIT DEFENSE BLOCKED: The House on Wednesday voted 222-204 to include an amendment to the Department of Justice appropriations bill that blocks any of the Act’s funds from being used to litigate the defense of President Obama’s unilateral lawmaking executive action on immigration in the 26 state lawsuit, Texas v. United States. Judge Andrew Hanen has issued a preliminary injunction in that lawsuit, preventing some of the actions from going forward, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently refused to stay that injunction, pending the trial on the merits.

The amendment was sponsored by Rep. Steve King (R-IA). Nineteen House Republicans–in mostly Hispanic districts–broke with party ranks to oppose the amendment.

It’s a good example of the House flexing its “power of the purse” muscle for a change, although the question remains whether DOJ will be able to use other funds to continue the litigation. And of course, the Senate has yet to act, and the President has threatened a veto.
 
Back
Top