Why this American physician is moving to Canada

badbabysitter

Vault Girl
Joined
Jul 6, 2002
Posts
19,179
http://blogs.theprovince.com/2015/0...-this-american-physician-is-moving-to-canada/

ROCHESTER, N.Y. — I’m a U.S. family physician who has decided to relocate to Canada. The hassles of working in the dysfunctional health care system in the U.S. have simply become too intense.

I’m not alone. According to a physician recruiter in Windsor, Ont., over the past decade more than 100 U.S. doctors have relocated to her city alone. More generally, the Canadian Institute for Health Information reports that Canada has been gaining more physicians from international migration than it’s been losing.

Like many of my U.S. counterparts, I’m moving to Canada because I’m tired of doing daily battle with the same adversary that my patients face — the private health insurance industry. Among the industry’s more egregious faults:

■ frequent errors in processing claims. The American Medical Association reports that one of every 14 claims submitted to commercial insurers are paid incorrectly.

■ outright denials of payment (about one to five per cent).

■ costly paperwork that consumes about 16 per cent of physicians’ working time, according to a recent journal study.

I’ve also witnessed the painful and continual shifting of medical costs onto my patients’ shoulders through rising copayments, deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses. According to a survey conducted by the Commonwealth Fund, 66 million — 36 per cent of Americans — reported delaying or forgoing needed medical care in 2014 because of the cost.

My story is relatively brief. Six years ago, shortly after completing my residency in Rochester, New York, I opened a solo family medicine practice in my adopted hometown.

I had a vision of cultivating a practice where patients felt heard and cared for and where I could provide full-spectrum family medicine care, including obstetric care. My practice embraced the principles of patient-centered collaborative care. It employed the latest in 21st-century technology.

I loved my work and my patients. But after five years of constant fighting with multiple private insurance companies, I made the heart-wrenching decision to close my practice down. The emotional stress was too great.

My spirit was being crushed. It broke my heart to have to pressure my patients to pay the bills their insurance companies said they owed. Private insurance never covers the whole bill and doesn’t kick in until patients have paid the deductible. For some, this means paying thousands of dollars out-of-pocket before insurance ever pays a penny.

Doctors deal with this conundrum in different ways. A recent New York Times article described how an increasing number of physicians are turning away from independent practice to join large employer groups (often owned by hospital systems) to be shielded from this side of our system. About 60 per cent of family physicians are now salaried employees rather than independent practitioners.

Too often, I’ve seen in these large, corporate physician practices that the personal relationship between doctor and patient gets lost. Both are reduced to mere cogs in the machine of what the late Dr. Arnold Relman, former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, called the medical-industrial complex in the U.S.

In seeking alternatives, I spoke with other physicians. We invariably ended up talking about the tumultuous time that the U.S. health care system is in and the challenges physicians face in trying to achieve the twin goals of improved medical outcomes and reduced cost.

The rub, of course, is that we’re working in a fragmented, broken system. Powerful, moneyed corporate interests thrive on this fragmentation, finding it easy to drive up costs and outmanoeuvre patients and doctors alike. Having multiple payers, each with their own rules, also drives up administrative costs — about $375 billion in waste annually, according to another recent journal study.

I knew that Canada had largely resolved the problem of delivering affordable, universal care by establishing a publicly financed single-payer system. I also knew that Canada’s system operates much more efficiently than the U.S. system, as outlined in a landmark paper in The New England Journal of Medicine.
 
Interesting, but not surprising.

What is surprising is that our UK Conservative Government is intent on dismantling our taxation-funded National Health Service... and replacing it with something derived from the dysfunctional private US healthcare industry.

http://blogs.theprovince.com/2015/0...-this-american-physician-is-moving-to-canada/

ROCHESTER, N.Y. — I’m a U.S. family physician who has decided to relocate to Canada. The hassles of working in the dysfunctional health care system in the U.S. have simply become too intense.

I’m not alone. According to a physician recruiter in Windsor, Ont., over the past decade more than 100 U.S. doctors have relocated to her city alone. More generally, the Canadian Institute for Health Information reports that Canada has been gaining more physicians from international migration than it’s been losing.

Like many of my U.S. counterparts, I’m moving to Canada because I’m tired of doing daily battle with the same adversary that my patients face — the private health insurance industry. Among the industry’s more egregious faults:

■ frequent errors in processing claims. The American Medical Association reports that one of every 14 claims submitted to commercial insurers are paid incorrectly.

■ outright denials of payment (about one to five per cent).

■ costly paperwork that consumes about 16 per cent of physicians’ working time, according to a recent journal study.

I’ve also witnessed the painful and continual shifting of medical costs onto my patients’ shoulders through rising copayments, deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses. According to a survey conducted by the Commonwealth Fund, 66 million — 36 per cent of Americans — reported delaying or forgoing needed medical care in 2014 because of the cost.

My story is relatively brief. Six years ago, shortly after completing my residency in Rochester, New York, I opened a solo family medicine practice in my adopted hometown.

I had a vision of cultivating a practice where patients felt heard and cared for and where I could provide full-spectrum family medicine care, including obstetric care. My practice embraced the principles of patient-centered collaborative care. It employed the latest in 21st-century technology.

I loved my work and my patients. But after five years of constant fighting with multiple private insurance companies, I made the heart-wrenching decision to close my practice down. The emotional stress was too great.

My spirit was being crushed. It broke my heart to have to pressure my patients to pay the bills their insurance companies said they owed. Private insurance never covers the whole bill and doesn’t kick in until patients have paid the deductible. For some, this means paying thousands of dollars out-of-pocket before insurance ever pays a penny.

Doctors deal with this conundrum in different ways. A recent New York Times article described how an increasing number of physicians are turning away from independent practice to join large employer groups (often owned by hospital systems) to be shielded from this side of our system. About 60 per cent of family physicians are now salaried employees rather than independent practitioners.

Too often, I’ve seen in these large, corporate physician practices that the personal relationship between doctor and patient gets lost. Both are reduced to mere cogs in the machine of what the late Dr. Arnold Relman, former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, called the medical-industrial complex in the U.S.

In seeking alternatives, I spoke with other physicians. We invariably ended up talking about the tumultuous time that the U.S. health care system is in and the challenges physicians face in trying to achieve the twin goals of improved medical outcomes and reduced cost.

The rub, of course, is that we’re working in a fragmented, broken system. Powerful, moneyed corporate interests thrive on this fragmentation, finding it easy to drive up costs and outmanoeuvre patients and doctors alike. Having multiple payers, each with their own rules, also drives up administrative costs — about $375 billion in waste annually, according to another recent journal study.

I knew that Canada had largely resolved the problem of delivering affordable, universal care by establishing a publicly financed single-payer system. I also knew that Canada’s system operates much more efficiently than the U.S. system, as outlined in a landmark paper in The New England Journal of Medicine.
 
In America we sue the shit outta our doctors. My MD works for a large hospital corporation. She makes 200K and the corporation handles the problems and headaches. She wont have a practice to sell when she retires, but she has a serene life till then.
 
What is surprising is that our UK Conservative Government is intent on dismantling our taxation-funded National Health Service... and replacing it with something derived from the dysfunctional private US healthcare industry.

Yes, our health insurance companies here are evil. And people like james can't wait to give them more money.
 
Don't Import Canada's Ideas on Health Care
By Sally Pipes - April 28, 2015


Move aside, maple syrup. Canada has a hot new export -- single-payer health care.

The New York State Assembly may soon consider legislation that would switch the Empire State to a Canadian-style single-payer system. Maine has expressed interest in doing the same.

So has Congress. Earlier this year, Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) introduced a bill to create government-run insurance programs in every Obamacare exchange.

Our northern neighbor's admirers should consult its history. Nearly fifty years ago, Canada charged a youthful chief executive with a massive overhaul of its healthcare system -- just as the United States has today. Canada now has a half-century of proof that government-dominated healthcare systems force patients to wait interminably long times for subpar treatment.

Canada's path to single payer began soon after World War II, when Premier Tommy Douglas introduced free hospital care in Saskatchewan. By 1962, the province was providing universal coverage for physician services, too.

In 2004, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation named Douglas "The Greatest Canadian," thanks largely to his role in socializing the Canadian healthcare system.

Socialized medicine went nationwide in 1966, with the passage of the Medical Care Act. Implementation of the single-payer scheme fell to Pierre Trudeau, the newly elected Prime Minister in 1968.

Trudeau campaigned on the promise of installing a "just society." Enthusiasm among Canada's youth propelled Trudeau into office with the first electoral majority of the 1960s. Observers dubbed the phenomenon "Trudeaumania."

Sound familiar? Trudeau was Canada's Barack Obama.

Like Trudeau, Obama rode a wave of young support -- Obamamania -- to power. Sixty-six percent of those under the age of 30 voted for Obama in 2008.

And like Trudeau, Obama is a fan of single-payer. During his 2008 campaign, Obama said, "If I were designing a system from scratch, I would probably go ahead with a single-payer system." In 2003, he flatly stated, "I happen to be a proponent of a single-payer universal health care program."

Obama wasn't able to sell single-payer to a skeptical American public. But that hasn't stopped him from returning to the idea. In a recent interview, the president noted that allowing private insurers, Medicaid, and Medicaid to join up "makes a lot of sense."

He was essentially advocating for an "all-payer system," under which insurers would band together to negotiate prices with healthcare providers. It's single-payer by another name.

As Canada's decades-long experience shows, single-payer by any name fails patients.

I was born in Canada and have seen single-payer lead to rationing and outright rejection of care. My mother died of colon cancer after being denied an early colonoscopy that could have identified the disease at a more treatable stage.

Her experience is not unique. The Health Council of Canada recently reported that Canada's wait times for receiving health care ranked last on a list of 11 developed countries. The country faces a shortage of family doctors, so almost half of Canadians have to go to the emergency room for basic health needs. Even then, 26 percent wait four or more hours to see a doctor in the ER.

Not even Canadians with major health issues get the care they need. The average Canadian waits 4.5 months for major procedures, such as neurosurgery or cardiovascular surgery. Waits for MRI tests average more than eight weeks.

Canadians don't trust their system. Seventy-eight percent of residents older than 45 fear they won't be able to receive timely care. Eighty-one percent expect the care they receive to be of low quality.

Even Dr. Claude Castonguay, the father of Quebec's government-run healthcare system, has concluded that Canada is in crisis. "We thought we could resolve the system's problems by rationing services or injecting massive amounts of new money into it," he said in 2008.

His prescription? "We are proposing to give a greater role to the private sector so that people can exercise freedom of choice."

Conservative Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has made strides toward reinvigorating his country's economy but has done nothing to change its failing healthcare system. Perhaps it is just too monumental a task to undertake.

There's a lesson in there for the United States -- once the government takes over the healthcare system, it's nearly impossible to undo the damage. That's why U.S. lawmakers must repeal and replace Obamacare sooner rather than later.

Canada proves that single-payer health care inevitably results in rationing and lost lives. Government-run health care is one Canadian import we should turn away.

Sally C. Pipes is President, CEO, and Thomas W. Smith Fellow in Health Care Policy at the Pacific Research Institute. Her latest book is The Cure for Obamacare (Encounter 2013).
 
so many fails in the that list

Canada's ranks 10th on a list of 11 developed nations for wait times... truly tragic.... if one ignores that the US doesnt even rank in the top 20


Trudeau was Canada's Brack Obama...true, he was a popular centrist...but unlike Obama , Trudeau was head of state for 15 years and is considered one of the countries greatest leaders... so by comparing the two you are essentially saying Obama is one of the US' greatest leaders


then again alot of antecdotes about wait times

then the author forgets to mention the triage system a universal healthcare system has... it's not who has the most money goes first, but who has the most need....... but dont let pesky things like facts get in your way

he then sites a doctor who works for medical insurance company

oh yeah, we have medical insurance here.... universal heatlhcare is OPTIONAL in Canada... if you dont want to wait for it.. you dont have to... but dont expect the government to pay for it
 
The right-wingers finally found an anti-Obamacare doctor. They've been looking for years.
 
Some of his numbers don't warrant him leaving NY state. He's just being an asshole.
 
Back
Top