JESUS, people. Return of Kings are NOT Men's Rights Activists. What the fuck.

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-e...to-watching-feminist-propaganda-10249443.html

Men’s Rights Activists have called for a boycott of Mad Max: Fury Road, describing it as “feminist propaganda” and bemoaning liberal Hollywood’s attempt to undermine traditional masculinity.

The film, which stars Charlize Theron as bald-headed warrior Furiosa alongside Tom Hardy’s Mad Max, has been criticised because Theron appears to have more lines and screentime than Hardy.

Aaron Clarey, a blogger on Return of Kings website which focuses on men’s issues, wrote that he was initially excited at the “explosions, fire tornadoes [and] symphonic score of Fury Road,” because it “looked like a straight-up guy flick.”
 
dude, you constantly tell the world what is and isnt feminism

if you can't take the same treatment, go whine to Paul Elam.. he feels the same you do


and even if he isnt an MRA

he sure the fuck is a gamergate champion
 
dude, you constantly tell the world what is and isnt feminism

if you can't take the same treatment, go whine to Paul Elam.. he feels the same you do


and even if he isnt an MRA

he sure the fuck is a gamergate champion
Gamergate thinks he's a fucking idiot.

I posted an open letter to Gamergate asking for a boycott on Roosh V's Reaxxion pro-Gamergate website:
http://lejacquelope.tumblr.com/post/113005002966/open-letter-to-the-gamergate-community-put

Someone then posted my open letter right to Gamergate's Reddit forum
http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2ya8sd/open_letter_to_the_gamergate_community_put/

and while they didn't boycott him, they won't support him, and they openly said he was a vile disgusting human being.


Now here's something about me, badbabysitter, that separates me from you:

I launch campaigns against misogynists and attack them openly.

You have never in your life lifted a finger against misandry. You let that shit go by like it's a whole lot of meh. You're a feminist, you don't even believe misandry exists.
 
bwhahahahahahaha

I knew you'd use that line of reasoning

and I'm glad you're opposed to roosh and his white supremacy date rapey ways.. that's awesome and his pro-harrasment stance for gamergate

but here's the thing

neither you or him are the embodiment of gamergate

yes, you both identify as gamergate supporters

and you want to know why

because gamergate is a fucking hashtag

literally anyone who can type on a keyboard can be a gamergater

anyone

thusly gamergate is not accountable for what it does

the people they target meanwhile have to be

so, Roosh here is a gamergater... just because a reddit forum doesnt like him, doesnt mean there aren't gamergaters that do

NotyourShield doesnt help either.. because NotyourShield IS a shield

you can point to it as an example of people who think a certain way... but that doesnt mean the gamergaters who are douchebags dont exist.... NotYourShield is an attempt to deflect criticism and nothing more



and dont give me some bullshit streetfighter speech... I've posted open misogynitc bullshit targeted at targets of gamergater douchebags and you did nothing but try to downplay it.. and have in fact repeated lies about these targets

that's not taking a stance.. that's called towing the company line

I dont need to take a stand against misnadry, mainly because I actually do shit in my day to day life that helps men and women of all ages... yelling on the internet isnt activism, it's trolling
 
bwhahahahahahaha

I knew you'd use that line of reasoning

and I'm glad you're opposed to roosh and his white supremacy date rapey ways.. that's awesome and his pro-harrasment stance for gamergate

but here's the thing

neither you or him are the embodiment of gamergate

yes, you both identify as gamergate supporters

and you want to know why

because gamergate is a fucking hashtag

literally anyone who can type on a keyboard can be a gamergater

anyone

thusly gamergate is not accountable for what it does

the people they target meanwhile have to be

so, Roosh here is a gamergater... just because a reddit forum doesnt like him, doesnt mean there aren't gamergaters that do

NotyourShield doesnt help either.. because NotyourShield IS a shield

you can point to it as an example of people who think a certain way... but that doesnt mean the gamergaters who are douchebags dont exist.... NotYourShield is an attempt to deflect criticism and nothing more



and dont give me some bullshit streetfighter speech... I've posted open misogynitc bullshit targeted at targets of gamergater douchebags and you did nothing but try to downplay it.. and have in fact repeated lies about these targets

that's not taking a stance.. that's called towing the company line

I dont need to take a stand against misnadry, mainly because I actually do shit in my day to day life that helps men and women of all ages... yelling on the internet isnt activism, it's trolling
And the very biggest and most fatal error of your post is that Gamergate is a hashtag. It's not just a hashtag you fool. They have a wiki and not everyone can just add to it.

Your entire argument is based on absolute ignorance.

And Notyourshield is genuinely populated by minorities and women.

And you have a history of ignoring and running away from proof of threats AGAINST Gamergate and threats from anti-Gamergate people.
 
All that being said, why anyone would ever complain about Charlize Theron getting too much screen time is beyond me.
 
Well... I like the idea of a boycott of Mad Max, not because of any suggested undermining of any gender, simply because it's a piece of crap.
 
And the very biggest and most fatal error of your post is that Gamergate is a hashtag. It's not just a hashtag you fool. They have a wiki and not everyone can just add to it.


Wait a second... they only pick and chose whose allowed to add to their knowledge.. and if someone tries putting something in that doesnt jibe with thier philisophy.. they aren't allowed?

you do realize that's called censorship... gamer gate ; we're all about ethics in gaming journalism!!!!

Your entire argument is based on absolute ignorance.

And Notyourshield is genuinely populated by minorities and women.

and so are the people that criticize gamergate... what makes your miniroities and women more valid than the women and minorites amongst gamergates critics?...short answer.. absolutely nothing


let me show you what I mean

Republican dude says something really fucking racist

a group of Republicans then create a hashtag called #RepublicansArentRacist... which is full of non racist republican men and women of all ages, colours and creeds

does that make the racist Republican suddenly not racist?

no

but you're saying because #RepublicansArentRacist exists, it invalidates what the first bigot said

and it doesnt

so it';s a shield

own it

And you have a history of ignoring and running away from proof of threats AGAINST Gamergate and threats from anti-Gamergate people.



and so do you

shit.. you're still spouting the very thoroughly debunked conspiracy theories about Brianna Wu.. whose sole crime against gamergate was the high crime of being threatned with death

I showed you what Anita Sarkeesian goes through an average week

you showed me three people threatening three different people

you showed me an unmarked envelope with a needle

I showed you bomb threats, murder threats, swatting, hacking, vidoes of guys who broke down on thier way to murder Brianna Wu..( whom you brushed off calling it a joke.. unless it happened to your kid, then somehow you decided the joke was worth murdering him over)

ALL of which are horrible

but ehre's the thing.. you've never actually said anything against the people who have commited these felonies

you're just constanly outraged by people who dare to have a different opinion


in closing here's something from a wiki that has no stake in the gamergate thing.......Rationalwiki


Gamergate styles itself as a grassroots consumer movement focused on "freedom of speech" and "ethics in video game journalism," based on the false accusation that Quinn slept with a video game critic in exchange for a good review of her game. Gamergate also believes that feminists (namely Anita Sarkeesian) want to censor video games. In reality, it is a backlash against the maturation of video games into a medium of academic study and subjective criticism, and the diversification of the "gamer" identity. In broader terms, is part of the "culture war" between progressivism and conservatism.

Despite the fact that none of Gamergate's claims hold up under scrutiny, they were initially able to put a positive spin on their intentions by running an astroturfing campaign, recruiting useful idiots into a token subgroup to counter claims of exclusivity. Gamergate was also courted by opportunistic right-wingers, MRAs, and neo-Nazis seeking to exploit it for political and later financial purposes. Once Gamergate's toxicity had driven out everyone who didn't obsess over the "social justice warrior" bogeymen of the Internet, hangers--on were able to use it as their personal revenge army.



....................

In the end, the gaming industry sees Gamergate as a punchline, evident from its treatment at the 2015 Game Developers Choice Awards. When Tim Schafer made a joke at their expense, utilizing a literal sockpuppet on stage, Gamergate accused him of racism and sexism.[247][248] They've also become an easy punchline when describing asshole conservatives

Gamergate has done exactly what they have set out to be against. They claim to fight unethical journalism with the help of an unethical journalist. They denounce what they perceive to be a blacklist while curating lists of websites and people they were boycotting. They persistently deny their obsession with Quinn and Sarkeesian while attacking them every chance they get. And they proclaim games are inclusive while supporting elements of the gaming community that actively exclude women



http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gamergate
 
Wait a second... they only pick and chose whose allowed to add to their knowledge.. and if someone tries putting something in that doesnt jibe with thier philisophy.. they aren't allowed?

you do realize that's called censorship... gamer gate ; we're all about ethics in gaming journalism!!!!
So in your universe they're either in league with Return of Kings or they're engaging in censorship. You've managed to take crazy to a quantum level.

and so are the people that criticize gamergate... what makes your miniroities and women more valid than the women and minorites amongst gamergates critics?...short answer.. absolutely nothing
It invalidates your side's incessant rhetoric that we're all a bunch of white entitled males. Nice try at avoiding taking ownership of that.

let me show you what I mean

Republican dude says something really fucking racist

a group of Republicans then create a hashtag called #RepublicansArentRacist... which is full of non racist republican men and women of all ages, colours and creeds

does that make the racist Republican suddenly not racist?
Feminists are more like Republicans than MRAs. Republicans preach the same paranoia toward blacks, Muslims and everyone else, as feminists preach toward men.

Literally take the feminist response to "not all men" and change "men" with "Muslims" or "black men" and you get Republican rhetoric.

Also see: Horseshoe theory.

Own it.

shit.. you're still spouting the very thoroughly debunked conspiracy theories about Brianna Wu.. whose sole crime against gamergate was the high crime of being threatned with death

I showed you what Anita Sarkeesian goes through an average week

you showed me three people threatening three different people
Yes I showed you MULTIPLE people being threatened, not just two, and you ignored it.

The only people who matter are people on your side.
 
Back
Top