DEA Gets Its Very Own Colombian Hookers-N-Blow Scandal

[JackLuis]

DEA Gets Its Very Own Colombian Hookers-N-Blow Scandal

Members of the Secret Service have to be feeling pretty relieved that theirs is now not the only federal agency with an embarrassing hookers-in-Colombia scandal. Agents from the Drug Enforcement Agency allegedly had “sex parties” — and possibly even wild sex parties — with prostitutes in Colombia from 2005 to 2008, according to a Department of Justice inspector general’s report. And just to add to the fun, the DEA agents’ prostie-parties were reportedly paid for by drug cartels, which is, depending on your perspective, either way worse or way better than the Secret Service prostitution capers. On the one hand, at least the Secret Service wasn’t having its hookers paid for by the Assassins’ Guild. On the other other hand, the Secret Service scandal came to light partly because the cheap bastards didn’t even pay their hookers, who complained, so we can take some comfort from the fact that the DEA’s ladies received a fair day’s wages for their negotiable affection. It’s all a matter of perspective, no?

So everybody does it, Right?

 

[JackLuis]

BREAKING! Secret Service Sexing Must Be Rampant Because Marines Bought A Hooker In Brazil!


Oh No, the Marines too!

Government Agencies Just Buying Each Other Hookers Now

Anyway, turns out that CIA Secret hooker? She was hired by the DEA. I KNOW.

That’s right — the Drug Enforcement Agency hired a Colombian hooker for President Obama’s advance team. The same agency that brought you the revelation of heroin being just as bad as weed is now bringing ladies of the night to the Secret Service, for secret services!

SO the CIA is infiltrating the DEA and the SS, with hookers!

You're Welcome.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

DEA Gets Its Very Own Colombian Hookers-N-Blow Scandal



So everybody does it, Right?

I'm curious as to what's the difference between a "sex party" & a "wild sex party".

 

[JackLuis]

I'm curious as to what's the difference between a "sex party" & a "wild sex party".

A sex party is three middle aged guys, one hooker and fifth of jack.

A wild sex party is six virile studs, twelve hookers, a pound of blow, a kilo of Good weed and three days leave!

 

[BotanyBoy]

DEA Gets Its Very Own Colombian Hookers-N-Blow Scandal

So everybody does it, Right?

LOL

A sex party is three middle aged guys, one hooker and fifth of jack.

A wild sex party is six virile studs, twelve hookers, a pound of blow, a kilo of Good weed and three days leave!

Sounds legit.

 

[miles]

The federal government gets more out of control with each passing day.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

you have to love government workers, as they are like crack abusers

 

[bogusguy]

No wonder people want government jobs!

 

[JackLuis]

Update 4-10-15

Party Pooper Eric Holder Reminds DOJ Staff They Cannot Have Sexy Funtimes With Hookers, Unfair!

So maybe Eric Holder is just trying to get in front of this “everyone who works for America is busy hiring prostitutes, which is ILLEGAL” thing before it takes down the entire U.S. of A. Or maybe he is just mean and no fun. Yeah, that’s probably it. IMPEACH!

 

[JackLuis]

Update 4-21-15

DEA head Michele Leonhart resigns as Congress prepares investigation into sex parties

Maybe Congress should send a team to Columbia to 'interrrogate' the Hookers?

 

[about_average]

1. Is prostitution legal where the parties took place?
2. At the time of the parties did the DEA have in place rules against agents hiring prostitutes?
If 1 is yes and 2 is no, then there was no wrong doing.

 

[sr71plt]

The DEA is one of several agencies with very strict code of conduct contracts, yes. If they were on an assignment in Colombia, they were on the job and doubly subject to that code of conduct.

 

[KingOrfeo]

I'm curious as to what's the difference between a "sex party" & a "wild sex party".

About 50 pesos an hour.

 

[AZMotherLover]

More collateral damage in the war on drugs.

Get rid of the DEA.

 

[about_average]

The DEA is one of several agencies with very strict code of conduct contracts, yes. If they were on an assignment in Colombia, they were on the job and doubly subject to that code of conduct.

Does that contract specifically prohibit hiring a prostitute?

 

[sr71plt]

Does that contract specifically prohibit hiring a prostitute?

Of course they do. The wording wouldn't be that specific, but it covers. I'm not sure what you are trying to kid yourself about.

 

[1sickbastard]

More collateral damage in the war on drugs.

Get rid of the DEA.

"It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times."~ Bill Hicks "Sane Man"

 

[about_average]

Of course they do. The wording wouldn't be that specific, but it covers. I'm not sure what you are trying to kid yourself about.

So it prohibits sex with someone you're not married to? Or what?
What kind of wording would prohibit legal sex with someone?

I'm not saying it doesn't, I'm asking if it does. So far I haven't seen any evidence it does.

 

[sr71plt]

So it prohibits sex with someone you're not married to? Or what?
What kind of wording would prohibit legal sex with someone?

I'm not saying it doesn't, I'm asking if it does. So far I haven't seen any evidence it does.

That's OK. I don't think anyone owes you any evidence of this. If all else fails, you could always try common sense. Or you could sit and watch them get their asses put in a sling over it. The results should be enough evidence for you. Actually, that the head of DEA resigned because of it should have given you a clue.

 

[phrodeau]

So it prohibits sex with someone you're not married to? Or what?
What kind of wording would prohibit legal sex with someone?

I'm not saying it doesn't, I'm asking if it does. So far I haven't seen any evidence it does.

"Turpitude" comes to mind. If it's in your contract, your boss gets to define it.

 

[about_average]

That's OK. I don't think anyone owes you any evidence of this. If all else fails, you could always try common sense. Or you could sit and watch them get their asses put in a sling over it. The results should be enough evidence for you. Actually, that the head of DEA resigned because of it should have given you a clue.

No, all that does is tell me that in the US people think prostitution is bad, or looks bad.

I didn't claim anyone "owed" me evidence. You're the one who made the claim, I thought you might be able to back it up.
It's ok if you can't provide any evidence that it's actually prohibited, but you should just say you can't, rather than try to deflect.

 

[about_average]

"Turpitude" comes to mind. If it's in your contract, your boss gets to define it.

Yeah, that might be one way. But if you're engaging in a perfectly legal activity then it's a stretch. But, like you say, it can be defined any way the boss wants.
Hopefully no religious fundamentalist gets appointed. A lot of people consider premarital sex "turpitude".

 

[BotanyBoy]

Yeah, that might be one way. But if you're engaging in a perfectly legal activity then it's a stretch. But, like you say, it can be defined any way the boss wants.
Hopefully no religious fundamentalist gets appointed. A lot of people consider premarital sex "turpitude".

Actually a fundy whack job would be perfect for the DEA......help push their shiny image further LOL

 

[about_average]

Actually a fundy whack job would be perfect for the DEA......help push their shiny image further LOL

Considering the reason for the DEA's existence is whack-a-doodle, I think you're right.