What if Hillary doesn't run?

M

Mister_Chris

Guest
Ms. Clinton is the 'presumptive' nominee for the Democrats... but she's not the confirmed nominee. She hasn't yet declared her candidacy. And truthfully, I don't think running would be a good idea.

First, the Democrats are unlikely to win in 2016, regardless of who is at the helm. Since 1960 (and possibly earlier) we've had two terms of one party followed by two terms of the other. The singular exception was Jimmy Carter in 1980, who failed to secure a second term for the Democrats; and Reagan/Bush senior, who together secured three terms for the Republicans. Given the recent loss of the Senate to the Republican party, it seems easy to predict that this 56 year long cycle will continue.

Secondly, running - first as a party candidate, then as a presidential candidate - is expensive, and time and energy consumptive. Much of the money will come from donations, but some will come from her pocket; and all of the time and energy will come from her. She'll be giving up a year of her life to run for a position in which the tide of history is running against her.

She might well look at the writing on the wall, and decide to spend the next year doing something else. She's already experienced one major loss, at the hands of Mr. Obama in 2008. I doubt she wishes to experience another such loss.

Were the Republican party to nominate an obviously brain dead candidate - a lobotomized Sarah Palin, or some similarly awful candidate; AND Ms. Clinton was effective at getting the female vote out; AND Mr. Obama enthusiastically and vigorously worked hard to get the Black vote out...

I dunno. Maybe. But Hillary doesn't seem to have the charisma or oratorical skills that Mr. Obama has demonstrated; and there are no significantly awful candidates that seem likely to win the Republican nomination (although there are no stellar ones, either). And I think that over the last eight years, Mr. Obama has drawn as much of the Black vote out as seems likely. That group is unlikely to swell in numbers.

I could easily see a circumstance in which Hillary might decide to sit 2016 out.

And if she does...

Then who is the next most likely candidate?

Because it seems to be Joe Biden; and the next step down is Bill Maher. And that's going pretty far down the pole.

Anybody got any thoughts? If Hillary doesn't run, who might step up and try to win for the Democrats?
 
Of course she will run. There is a lot of money n running, and if she has to bow out she will find ways to keep a lot of the money.
 
really?

Are you suggesting that she could turn a profit by choosing to become a candidate, even if she lost?

I would have thought it worked the other way. She'd come out poorer, not richer.

Yes, she'd be able to go on speaking tours and write best selling books. But she's doing that already.

Thoughts?
 
She's been running for a while. The "book tour" was basically the unofficial start of her presidential campaign.

Given how she's hired everyone from the last time she ran and they've been shitting the bed just as hard as they did last time, my money on it playing out like this.

She's starts off the two-years-long campaign cycle as the frontrunner. In fact, she's "inevitable." Her team continues to shit the bed. Her lead slowly starts to erode. The guy/gal in second place makes alliances with candidates who know they have no shot to nuke her campaign. She loses, again.

Basically, at this point, given what she's done and how she's handled her image, things are playing out exactly like 2008. As long as someone who is mildly competent and actually likable runs against her, the story will probably play out like it did then.
 
OP, your username concerns me for reasons completely unrelated to the board.
 
CandiCame, you've lost me. Completely. My username is one of the characters in one of my stories. Clarify?
 
Ms. Clinton is the 'presumptive' nominee for the Democrats... but she's not the confirmed nominee. She hasn't yet declared her candidacy. And truthfully, I don't think running would be a good idea.

First, the Democrats are unlikely to win in 2016, regardless of who is at the helm. Since 1960 (and possibly earlier) we've had two terms of one party followed by two terms of the other. The singular exception was Jimmy Carter in 1980, who failed to secure a second term for the Democrats; and Reagan/Bush senior, who together secured three terms for the Republicans. Given the recent loss of the Senate to the Republican party, it seems easy to predict that this 56 year long cycle will continue.

Secondly, running - first as a party candidate, then as a presidential candidate - is expensive, and time and energy consumptive. Much of the money will come from donations, but some will come from her pocket; and all of the time and energy will come from her. She'll be giving up a year of her life to run for a position in which the tide of history is running against her.

She might well look at the writing on the wall, and decide to spend the next year doing something else. She's already experienced one major loss, at the hands of Mr. Obama in 2008. I doubt she wishes to experience another such loss.

Were the Republican party to nominate an obviously brain dead candidate - a lobotomized Sarah Palin, or some similarly awful candidate; AND Ms. Clinton was effective at getting the female vote out; AND Mr. Obama enthusiastically and vigorously worked hard to get the Black vote out...

I dunno. Maybe. But Hillary doesn't seem to have the charisma or oratorical skills that Mr. Obama has demonstrated; and there are no significantly awful candidates that seem likely to win the Republican nomination (although there are no stellar ones, either). And I think that over the last eight years, Mr. Obama has drawn as much of the Black vote out as seems likely. That group is unlikely to swell in numbers.

I could easily see a circumstance in which Hillary might decide to sit 2016 out.

And if she does...

Then who is the next most likely candidate?

Because it seems to be Joe Biden; and the next step down is Bill Maher. And that's going pretty far down the pole.

Anybody got any thoughts? If Hillary doesn't run, who might step up and try to win for the Democrats?

I don't believe the Dems have anybody else right now. Biden is a laughing stock like Dan Quayle was in 1996 and E. Warren arouses no confidence in most voters. She could maybe win the nomination but would lose in an historical landslide. Unless somebody comes out of nowhere, as Carter did in 1976, they have no viable candidate.
 
I don't believe the Dems have anybody else right now. Biden is a laughing stock like Dan Quayle was in 1996 and E. Warren arouses no confidence in most voters. She could maybe win the nomination but would lose in an historical landslide. Unless somebody comes out of nowhere, as Carter did in 1976, they have no viable candidate.

Uh, Warren drew presidential race level volunteers and donors for her US Senate race and is actually popular. If she were to run, she'd be formidable--both in the primary and general.

And Biden isn't seen as a joke. Vain and the owner of a big mouth, yes. But you don't get to be both the youngest person ever elected to the US Senate and one of its longest-serving members if you are a joke.
 
Those who know Hillary say her guide star is wealth enough to live on Park Avenue with the ultra billionaires. She's ashamed her father was a mere businessman rather than a prince. She doesn't like common people tho she married Bubba. She's an imposter. Obama beat her because he's a lowly nigger who can never be a prince.

Jeb Bush has the same fatal flaw as Hillary. He's an imposter.

I'm betting Jim Webb is the Democrat nominee, and he'll win over Scott Walker.
 
Any Democratic candidate running for President these days is formidable. The election could be decided by the GOP if they nominate another weak RINO instead of a genuine conservative.
 
Those who know Hillary say her guide star is wealth enough to live on Park Avenue with the ultra billionaires. She's ashamed her father was a mere businessman rather than a prince. She doesn't like common people tho she married Bubba. She's an imposter. Obama beat her because he's a lowly nigger who can never be a prince.

Jeb Bush has the same fatal flaw as Hillary. He's an imposter.

I'm betting Jim Webb is the Democrat nominee, and he'll win over Scott Walker.

Biden is an incompetent Bozo, which is why he was Obama's VP for eight years.
 
Any Democratic candidate running for President these days is formidable. The election could be decided by the GOP if they nominate another weak RINO instead of a genuine conservative.

So, in your own words... Who do you think would be a good non-RINO candidate for the G00p?
 
So, in your own words... Who do you think would be a good non-RINO candidate for the G00p?

Miles will never answer that.

Kinda like his bro Chickenshit McFatass, who famously explained after 25 (!!) Republican primary debates: "We don't know enough about the candidates! Hurr Durr!"
 
She's been running for a while. The "book tour" was basically the unofficial start of her presidential campaign.

Given how she's hired everyone from the last time she ran and they've been shitting the bed just as hard as they did last time, my money on it playing out like this.

She's starts off the two-years-long campaign cycle as the frontrunner. In fact, she's "inevitable." Her team continues to shit the bed. Her lead slowly starts to erode. The guy/gal in second place makes alliances with candidates who know they have no shot to nuke her campaign. She loses, again.

Basically, at this point, given what she's done and how she's handled her image, things are playing out exactly like 2008. As long as someone who is mildly competent and actually likable runs against her, the story will probably play out like it did then.


This is a lot different than last time. By March 2007, Obama had already announced and was drawing attention. In addition, John Edwards had basically never stopped running for president after 2004, and he was always in a stronger position in Iowa than Hillary was.

I'm not really a fan of Hillary, but you can't beat somebody with nobody. If anyone who was a plausible nominee thought they had a chance, they would be in the race already. It isn't happening.
 
Uh, Warren drew presidential race level volunteers and donors for her US Senate race and is actually popular. If she were to run, she'd be formidable--both in the primary and general.

And Biden isn't seen as a joke. Vain and the owner of a big mouth, yes. But you don't get to be both the youngest person ever elected to the US Senate and one of its longest-serving members if you are a joke.

That was for the Senate from MA, and she did win there. If Hillary does not run and Warren does, the latter will probably win the nomination. However, she will lose the general election in a huge landslide, unless the GOP shoots themselves in the foot again.

Biden is known to be afflicted with foot in mouth disease, as Quayle was.
 
That was for the Senate from MA, and she did win there. If Hillary does not run and Warren does, the latter will probably win the nomination. However, she will lose the general election in a huge landslide, unless the GOP shoots themselves in the foot again.

E.g., by nominating a Cruz/Walker/Huckabee/Santorum/Perry/Gohmert/Carson. Warren could wipe the floor with any "true conservative" Pub.
 
E.g., by nominating a Cruz/Walker/Huckabee/Santorum/Perry/Gohmert/Carson. Warren could wipe the floor with any "true conservative" Pub.

Likewise, the GOP won't nominate anyone remotely centrist without insisting they run to the far, far, right and decimate any moderate support they may have had in the meantime. See Romney.
 
Likewise, the GOP won't nominate anyone remotely centrist without insisting they run to the far, far, right and decimate any moderate support they may have had in the meantime. See Romney.

Well, let's not get too cocky. Jeb or Rubio could do that and still win. But nobody else now on the GOP bench could.
 
E.g., by nominating a Cruz/Walker/Huckabee/Santorum/Perry/Gohmert/Carson. Warren could wipe the floor with any "true conservative" Pub.

I remember Goldwater's lopsided loss to LBJ in 1964, but I also remember Nixon winning the biggest landslide in history over McGovern in 1972. What the GOP needs is a person who is a liberal in matters such as same sex marriage, abortions, etc. and a fiscal and international conservative at the same time. In other words, a Libertarian.
 
Democrats and Republicans offer voters the choice of the street or the poor house.
 
Back
Top