Could an artificial intelligence be elected US president?

[Mike_Yates]

In the distant future, could an AI computer be elected as POTUS?

Would you trust a machine running America?

 

[Que]

We don't even look for real intelligence in a President.

 

[DesEsseintes]

In the distant future, could an AI computer be elected as POTUS?

Would you trust a machine running America?

Any kind of intelligence would be preferable.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You would have to change the Constitution.


The answer is no. When the machines make their decision, they'll just take over.

 

[patient1]

You would have to change the Constitution.


The answer is no. When the machines make their decision, they'll just take over.

Agreed. We humans are already hard at work developing the drone technology( so they can hunt us down), ubiquitous cell phones ( to make us easier to find ), 3-D printers ( so they can replicate themselves) and so forth.

 

[MNGuy]

I'm more curious to when I can upload myself to a computer cyborg body and live hundreds of years.

http://i.cdn.turner.com/v5cache/CARTOON/site/Images/i65/ttg_propd_charcyborg.png

 

[possum123]

We have already elected an artificial. Haven't elected an intelligent anything yet.
Maybe that should be our first goal.
We could elect a cucumber and things would be about the same as what we have elected in quite a while.

 

[Pookie]

You would have to change the Constitution.


The answer is no. When the machines make their decision, they'll just take over.

Ahnold said he'd be back. *nods*

 

[possum123]

I have thought for many years our judicial system should be computerized.

 

[JBCorbell]

I would be in favor of anything that brings intelligence of any sort to American poltics

 

[PoppingTom]

Would you trust a machine running America?

Absolutely. If it looks like this....

http://i00.i.aliimg.com/wsphoto/v0/533129344/Realistic-dildo-with-sucker-and-clear-font-b-vein-b-font-fake-penis-Multi-font-b.jpg

...and says "I never had sex with that woman" at the touch of a button, I'd totally trust it.

 

[phrodeau]

Only in Futurama.

http://futurama.wikia.com/wiki/John_Quincy_Adding_Machine

 

[Mike_Yates]

Machines are probably more trustworthy than people.

 

[RedAllan]

ATM's already rule my life.

Anyway aren't we all in the matrix.
'

 

[possum123]

Machines are probably more trustworthy than people.

Agreed. Can't pay off a computer.

 

[PayDay]

In the distant future, could an AI computer be elected as POTUS?

Article II, Section 1, The Constitution of the United States of America:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleii

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.

Would you trust a machine running America?

What's the difference?

 

[possum123]

Article II, Section 1, The Constitution of the United States of America:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleii





What's the difference?

Look at what we have right now.
A large part of the population does not think he passed the first example.

 

[Busybody]

In the distant future, could an AI computer be elected as POTUS?
?

not if it was assembled in Kenya

 

[cowslinger64]

Look at what we have right now.
A large part of the population does not think he passed the first example.

Large part? Get the hell outta here.


Birthers are among the biggest idiots on the planet.

 

[Busybody]

Large part? Get the hell outta here.


Birthers are among the biggest idiots on the planet.

who started the BIRTHER MOVEMENT?

 

[cowslinger64]

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/03/hillary-clinton-supporters-were-not-the-first-birthers/

Lots of articles to support is was NOT the Clintons... and although they were onboard with it early on, once the proof was shown, they got off.. those wearing their tin hats with empty heads, have not tho.

 

[Busybody]

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/03/hillary-clinton-supporters-were-not-the-first-birthers/

Lots of articles to support is was NOT the Clintons... and although they were onboard with it early on, once the proof was shown, they got off.. those wearing their tin hats with empty heads, have not tho.

BS source

It was started by Clinton peeps

Just as the Willie Horton issue was started by Dumz (M Cuomo)

 

[possum123]

Large part? Get the hell outta here.


Birthers are among the biggest idiots on the planet.

May be and may not be. There hasn't been anyway to check.

 

[Busybody]

and there is no such thing as Clinton people

its always CLINTON

you may recall your buddy the NIGGER called him, Clinton, RACIST

 

[cowslinger64]

I said there were lots of links to articles about it. I posted the first one that came up.


Even IF it were the Clintons, as stated, once the proof was shown, only a FUCKING MORON would have kept believing it.


I imagine that would be you.