windbag du jour.

exaybachay really should be a thing. fuck you all for not seeing dead man.
 
His reply will have more words than all posts on page one combined.

Bet.

I'll take that bet.


You will need to be a good idea to have a great day. I have a great day. I have a great day. I have a great day. The only way to get the best way to get the best way to get the best way for the first time in the morning and evening of the best way to get the best way for the first time in the morning and evening of a sudden I am not going anywhere for the first time in the morning. It was a great day and night and day out of town for the first time in the morning. I have a great day. I have a great day. I have a great deal of time to get the best way to get the best way to get the best way. The first thing you need to get to know if you are not the intended recipient of the most part of the most part of the best way to get the best way to get the best of luck. If you have any questions you may have been a while back and forth between the two of the most part of the best way to get the job done. The only thing that you can get a chance to win the game. The best thing about the same time as a result of the most important thing is that I have been in the morning and evening of the most important part of the best way for the first time in the morning. The first one to the right to the next few days ago.
 
People, this is not how you do passive aggressive.

The way this has been traditionally done is you run over to the blurt thread and say exactly what the OP has said here while I am still constructing my irrefutable argument elsewhere.

You then have a little collective giggle without having to go to the trouble to actually read what I have to say, much lest form a cogent counterpoint. I believe if you will review one of the several walls of tet you will see that I corectly predicted this would be the response when I took the bait on Funk's assertion about the "cool kids."

I always appreciate a vanity thread, though.

...and no, I will not show you my dick.

Be cool, kids. :cool:
 
People, this is not how you do passive aggressive.
The way this has been traditionally done is you run over to the blurt thread and say exactly what the OP has said here while I am still constructing my irrefutable argument elsewhere.

You then have a little collective giggle without having to go to the trouble to actually read what I have to say, much lest form a cogent counterpoint. I believe if you will review one of the several walls of tet you will see that I corectly predicted this would be the response when I took the bait on Funk's assertion about the "cool kids."

I always appreciate a vanity thread, though.

...and no, I will not show you my dick.

Be cool, kids. :cool:
This posts makes me think of one of those guys that thinks everyone doesn't like them because their nay-sayers are <insert excuse here>

I don't blurt about you and I'm not a cool kid. I don't hide I don't like you, though I mostly try to ignore you. There is something underneath all your blabber that reads 'naked under a trench coat' creepy.

You show your ass regularly, why be bashful about your dick?
 
This posts makes me think of one of those guys that thinks everyone doesn't like them because their nay-sayers are <insert excuse here>

I don't blurt about you and I'm not a cool kid. I don't hide I don't like you, though I mostly try to ignore you. There is something underneath all your blabber that reads 'naked under a trench coat' creepy.

You show your ass regularly, why be bashful about your dick?

You don't find starting this thread to be extremely passive aggressive?

Why would I give any consideration of what might motivate my naysayers?

While I appreciate your apparent forthrightness, don't sell yourself short. The Cool Kids appellation of the week for me is "Creepy" I am sure they will give you a gold star for that. FWIW, I own about 8 trench coats including a beautiful one in camel hair. ...and I live in the desert. Make of that what you will.

If (since you suggested the exercise) I were to give any thought at all as to what might motivate your dislike, I would say it is because I like puns and from time to time beat you to starting a parody thread, a territory that you seem to have staked out as your own. I have noticed that not only mine, but anyone that starts one, you seldom participate or give kudos to that thread starter if it is a parody.

Understandable. Humans are territorial about what they feel makes them special

This little joust reminds me a bit of Lorelie who I haven't as far as I recall said a single word to by way of interaction for at least a year saying she found it "creepy" that I would have some alts, as if I would spend effort interacting with someone furtively that I have zero interest in overtly.
 
You don't find starting this thread to be extremely passive aggressive?

Why would I give any consideration of what might motivate my naysayers?

While I appreciate your apparent forthrightness, don't sell yourself short. The Cool Kids appellation of the week for me is "Creepy" I am sure they will give you a gold star for that. FWIW, I own about 8 trench coats including a beautiful one in camel hair. ...and I live in the desert. Make of that what you will.

If (since you suggested the exercise) I were to give any thought at all as to what might motivate your dislike, I would say it is because I like puns and from time to time beat you to starting a parody thread, a territory that you seem to have staked out as your own. I have noticed that not only mine, but anyone that starts one, you seldom participate or give kudos to that thread starter if it is a parody.

Understandable. Humans are territorial about what they feel makes them special

This little joust reminds me a bit of Lorelie who I haven't as far as I recall said a single word to by way of interaction for at least a year saying she found it "creepy" that I would have some alts, as if I would spend effort interacting with someone furtively that I have zero interest in overtly.
I didn't start the thread. I responded and your post was addressed everyone in the thread. But of course you don't pay attention to the words you write.

Oh so that must be it, since I bid for popularity and try desperately to belong. I constantly quote people's posts who don't respond to me. Even after they blatantly asked,"why do you keep quoting my posts when I don't respond to you?" And keep quoting their posts anyway?

Nope, not even a little creepy.

I see, so I'm jealous of you, that has to be it.

I find you creepy and not funny, therefore if I decided to creep out others you'd be my main inspiration and enviable in your obvious expertise. That others choose to think you're creepy too, should tell you something other than 'they are out to get me because I'm better than them.'

Any competition to be funny is in your own head.

What the fuck do alts have to do with why I don't like you? I have plenty of reasons and you know what they are, because I haven't hid them. I can go back, but I don't have the time to sort through your dribble to find them.

You can pretend you don't know what I'm talking about, your delusion and ego can remain unscathed.

And on ignore you go.
 
Last edited:
I can see why people that would find me "creepy" would want to bring themselves to my attention. Kinda like those meddling kids on Scooby Doo.

Nowhere did I say you started the thread. You highlighted the bit that I said about the OP being passive aggressive, and asked if you didn't think the thread was passive aggressive.

Whether or not I do a good job of conveying my meanings, to snark that I don't pay attention to what I write is specious at best.

But thanks for stopping by to make sure you had the last word with the guy that "creeps you out" before putting me on ignore.

I always assumed the affection that some around here display for Lorelie was in the vein one might show an idiot cousin. I had no idea she was leader of the brain trust. Never thought I would be seeing a handful of haters parroting her silly little, unwarranted insult.
 
I don't know about alt's, I just find his posts often times require more energy and time than I have to spend. Because of said limited time and energy, I have tried to subscribe to a practice of only judging people on the interactions I have personally with them. Query has always been respectful when posting along side me, even when we don't see eye to eye and I'm inclined to believe much of what he says is truth. He has value here...aside from his feuding with Rob, which I try to tune out.
 
I don't know about alt's, I just find his posts often times require more energy and time than I have to spend. Because of said limited time and energy, I have tried to subscribe to a practice of only judging people on the interactions I have personally with them. Query has always been respectful when posting along side me, even when we don't see eye to eye and I'm inclined to believe much of what he says is truth. He has value here...aside from his feuding with Rob, which I try to tune out.

I think the portion of the charge in the Op about me being a bit long-winded is more than fair.

It amuses me that the OP, who I have no previous interaction with (that I know of), took offense at something in another thread and decided to start this whole thread.
 
I think the portion of the charge in the Op about me being a bit long-winded is more than fair.

It amuses me that the OP, who I have no previous interaction with (that I know of), took offense at something in another thread and decided to start this whole thread.

I didn't see it, but I have posted with Tris on here for a long time....she's blunt but from what I've experienced, she's not usually a member of the "bitch without cause" club.

I didn't see her OP as particularly nasty, not for the GB, but I also though I would say my piece - the scales could use a little counterweight to balance it out.
 
I didn't see it, but I have posted with Tris on here for a long time....she's blunt but from what I've experienced, she's not usually a member of the "bitch without cause" club.

I didn't see her OP as particularly nasty, not for the GB, but I also though I would say my piece - the scales could use a little counterweight to balance it out.

I appreciate that, but to be honest, I didn't find it particularly caustic either. I only bothered to respond because it now gives me a permanent place to respond every time someone is not interested in engaging me and wants to go to the blurt thread and giggle amongst themselves about, "Is he STILL talking??? My GOD why won't he FUCKING SHUT UP???"

As if anyone asked them to respond. Especially interesting is when they do that when one of their little allies is losing a debate that the ally started.

Dolf had it correct about that thread, people were just re-hashing old wounds and alliances.
 
Back
Top