How to Block?

Trial by fire? You didn't imply that by posting that? You did so! And you were being serious.

I can be serious. Where is the stupidity in the question below?

Show me.

Show me where the cunts are. The first two pages were full of all those nice responses just like yours. The only one even remotely mean was Wings but they've got a thing going from an old thread that was bumped. And Sean was unhelpful which dolf commented that she was gullible. Where are the cunts? Even on the second page, she is treated with respect. A couple people asked incredulously about her asking for a block feature while seemingly unable to just do what they have been doing. But where are the cunts, girly? Even on the third fucking page when nips gets outraged by responses and killswitch goes off the rails about women being bitches and hassling her(where????) it is STILL congenial with people responding to her initial inquiry, giving her options and advice on what to do in her particular situation. bg was probably the first outright bitchy one and it was snarky at best, saying in fewer words what wings said: grow up or get out.

The stupidity is here:

Hmm....doesn't seem to do anything.

No, that is not what happened.

Just to set the record straight, I had a problem with one particular person, and thought I could find some friendly, helpful people here on Lit, and clearly I was dead wrong.

My bad. I'm totally owning it. There, happy?

Never mind; sorry I asked. :rolleyes:

If there was a way to end this thread, I'd do it, but I suspect that's on the long list of "can't dos" on the Lit Forum.

That having been said, it would appear I've stumbled upon the Douche Board. That's what it should be named.

My bad, but it didn't come with a warning. :(

It comes off as snooty and whiny, not particularly sure of herself or confident. Immature, not necessarily stupid. And yes, that last one, asking while bumping the thread how to stop it from being open, is dumb. She keeps attacking like a child and then stepping back and saying we're the mean ones. And yes, the forum does come with a warning. At the top of the page in the blue, where it says "New to posting on the Gb? Please read!!"

Where are the cunts that we're up in arms about? The fact that she is so sensitive as to take what was given on the first three pages as enough to call us the "Douche Board" says that she's oversensitive to the point of being mentally incapable of dealing with anything worse than that.
 
Jumped in? I have been on this thread for hours, since long before your appearance. Good grief you are a fucking moron.

Yes with your bullshit answer to a question. But again, amusing. I haven't attacked the OP, or you for that matter.

I asked a question. You didn't answer it and are instead attacking me to prove what exactly? That you're a cunt?
 
Most GB posters are average or below in terms of intellect so I don't know what fucking fantasy world you are living in.

Yes, but you're a narcissist, so, taking this with a grain of salt.

She is that, and I don't think she would deny it, but she has a fair point.

There are some posters that are both smart and snarky on Lit and those, to your point, tend to end up here. Those smart posters that either don't seem to feel the need to specialize in snark, or find receiving it tedious are smart enough to stay away.

I think you may make the mistake that I recently realized I do online and off. I like engaging with smart people. When I enjoy engaging with someone I assume they are smart. Lately I have come to realize that sometimes I am imbuing some people with qualities I wish they had, other than the ones they actually have.

If you will reflect, when actually average the apparent intellect here, it is quite average. Some brilliant people, and some painfully dumb ones. I do think there is good correlation between humor and intelligence so those that can make me laugh I tend to score higher.

You can tell the really dumb ones because most of their posts are them telling another poster what a dummy he or she is. They sense that they have nothing to contribute, so their only option is to demean someone else. They are engaged in self-reflection, but they are not smart enough to realize it. This post, of course puts me in that camp, I realize.
 
I think the only thing we can agree on is we're ALL a bunch of Bitches.

:cool:


accept hot fudge. :eek:
 
Narcissist, no. That is a clinical term. I am intelligent enough to understand the actual meaning of the word, unlike you. But yes I am full of myself.

I stand corrected.

A lot of us are full of ourselves. It is refreshing to hear someone admit it.
 
So it wasn't a stupid question.

Thank you.

Now if only some people here could stop blaming their insanely shitty behaviour on other people I might not feel so insanely shittily bored.
 
I think the only thing we can agree on is we're ALL a bunch of Bitches.

:cool:


accept hot fudge. :eek:

Yes, she is the exception that proves the rule. There are a very small percentage of posters like her, and lemonbread that do not feel the need to snark, but are accepted none-the-less. It takes a thick hide and time to be awarded an emeritus position like that. Glyndah and Noor are like that.

The quickest path to acceptance on the GB is to snark with abandon, and make sure you mind the alliances and reserve the barbs for the right people. Newbies are always safe. And cunt. It helps if you use that word a lot. The cunts feel all bad ass when they hear it.

We need chat to be broken and to close the looking for a story forum. Those acted as a relief valve where established posters and untested newbies coula all agree, "This calls from some sarcasm!"
 
:rolleyes:

I'm not sure how that untruth leads you to use the wrong form of a homonym, but okay.

I'm now craving a hot fudge sundae with 1HF! :rose:

I'd use a correct homonym, if I knew what a homonym was!

She was nice and called me out for being an asshole to greekbabe so I gave her a shout out, albeit weird.
 
She is that, and I don't think she would deny it, but she has a fair point.

There are some posters that are both smart and snarky on Lit and those, to your point, tend to end up here. Those smart posters that either don't seem to feel the need to specialize in snark, or find receiving it tedious are smart enough to stay away.

I think you may make the mistake that I recently realized I do online and off. I like engaging with smart people. When I enjoy engaging with someone I assume they are smart. Lately I have come to realize that sometimes I am imbuing some people with qualities I wish they had, other than the ones they actually have.

If you will reflect, when actually average the apparent intellect here, it is quite average. Some brilliant people, and some painfully dumb ones. I do think there is good correlation between humor and intelligence so those that can make me laugh I tend to score higher.

You can tell the really dumb ones because most of their posts are them telling another poster what a dummy he or she is. They sense that they have nothing to contribute, so their only option is to demean someone else. They are engaged in self-reflection, but they are not smart enough to realize it. This post, of course puts me in that camp, I realize.

No, she doesn't have a fair point. As I stated in my previous post, nobody was mean to this girl. 3 people were what I consider rude in the first three pages. That doesn't call for an intervention or a much needed self-reflection. And a couple of those responses were prompted by previous interactions with this poster and yet they were STILL helpful in answer the original question.

I disagree about the projection theory. I did say "not people who think they're smart" and I didn't use the word "geniuses" or "intellectual sophisticates". I said they're smart. You can objectively assess whether or not someone has a healthy outlook and worthwhile experience and opinion to share. Those who don't, who aren't "smart" usually are seen complaining about the place and whining. Just because they do their whining here doesn't mean that overall the conversation here is not better than the Playground, which was why the word smart even came up, as a comparison with the other, safer board(I was responding to you but didn't quote you).
 
Not possible.

Such a fucking cunt.

No way, no how.

quit hassling her!

Why do I feel like somebody fears their spouse recognizing them?

Why would you want to block someone from access to seeing or participating unless you are hiding something that they can reveal as a falsehood?

My only real advice if the above isn't the case: don't post personal info/images

omg! What a cunt!

Might have to go to a certain island and ask Mr. Roarke for help with that doozy, NBN.

All cunts here, it seems!

Nah, I think she doesn't care for a regular and wants to limit that person's ability to post at her.

OP, you're just going to have to mentally ignore or choose not to post.

Nobody is fucking safe from all this cuntish attitude!

No you cannot block them here like on Facebook.

Ignore is your best option if the person is just being a PIA.

Not responding to the offensive poster really annoys them too.

;)

This should be called the Douche Board!!!!

I would recognize those nipples anywhere.

Ew!

gullible.

Troll! She is getting trolled so bad right now!!!!!

as we've already established, you have no power to impose that.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!! Fucking dolf is so mean! She's a new person! Just give her a break!
 
Back
Top