bull4cuckolds
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2007
- Posts
- 144
Poll
Poll closed
Poll closed
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i believe that in the privacy and secrecy of the bedroom, when a cuck performs oral on the Bull while his wife watches, it has nothing at all to do with his sexuality. It is all about playing out his cuckold role, submission, respect, humiliation, entertaining the wife, and keeping the Bull hard so he can fuck her again and again. It has nothing to do with gay/bi.
My opinion is that it would make you more bisexual. Not gay! Sexuality is one giant grey area to me! Also my opinion!
KC
i believe that in the privacy and secrecy of the bedroom, when a cuck performs oral on the Bull while his wife watches, it has nothing at all to do with his sexuality. It is all about playing out his cuckold role, submission, respect, humiliation, entertaining the wife, and keeping the Bull hard so he can fuck her again and again. It has nothing to do with gay/bi.
I would think the first logical question one should ask is: Who cares?
I suppose that if you are taking a lie detector test and they ask you if you are straight, there might be a problem. However, if you are not planning on leaving your wife/girlfriend, etc., then again what does it matter as long as you assure her you are not leaving her? If you are religious (for example Catholic), do you think telling your priest you suck cock for the love of your wife and not the love of the man or his penis makes a rats ass of difference to him?
That aside, if you must come up with labels for yourself, the next important question is: Don't you need to define "gay" before asking whether this particular thing defines you as "gay"? (In fact the answer to your question may fall out for you by how you define "gay".)
If you want to define "gay" similarly as they did in the old days with blacks in regards to race where one drop of African blood meant you were black, then by that definition a guy sucking cock is not 100% straight and therefore would fall into the gay category simply because the behavior isn't 100% straight. I say it is not 100% straight as the only way I can see a 100% straight guy sucking cock voluntarily is if a male he cares about (non-sexually/non-romantically) got bit by a spider/snake/etc and they were desperate to get the venom out before damaging the penis, then I would say that doesn't constitute a change in any sexuality label that the individual rendering the service had before the act. Now some gay porn male actors claim to do it only for the money; In my own opinion I would think at best they are bi.
I tend to agree with Mr. Briggs that sexuality is about love/romance -- not body parts. Besides, how many of us actually fit labels to a "t" anyway? What about a guy who craves all sex involving another guy -- like maybe a guy who would love to live full time in a bath house or an adult bookstore, but has no desire for any romantic flings with a guy (or for that matter a girl)? What about men who resent women yet love to fuck them; but have absolutely no desire to be tied romantically to one?
In my particular case, I love to sexually be inside the kind of guys who turn me on. I'm really not attracted to penises; but with my romantic interests, penises cum with the territory. I would be perfectly happy if men came with vaginas & wombs. Does that make me straight? I don't think so. Thus even for me, labels really don't do much...
The only purpose I see for labels is to make short cuts in the responsibility to get to know someone for who they really are. Yes they do serve their purpose. I'm physically and romantically attracted to masculine, hairy, muscular, adult, Caucasian bottoms. So I can save myself and others from wasted energy and time if I know those labels before considering a relationship. (Luckily, I've been off the market for almost 13 years.) However, for friendships it is best to get to know the person and punt the shortcut labels.
Keep in mind too that social norms and thus the labels associated with norms are influenced by the times and the culture they are part of. For instance, in the Philippines, it is very common for male best friends to hold hands or go arm and arm after work. To do the same with a woman might give her a really slutty reputation. Yet if you tried to call such guys "gay" (or use the term "billy boy"), they would get angry. Some cultures you also notice that it isn't unheard of for two guys to kiss (the non-tongue type of kiss). Again, they are not going to get it on..
Time wise, in my day most guys would not groom for minutes on end nor would guys cross their legs unless to make a table top kind of cross. For the last couple or so decades I have seen plenty of young men doing those behaviors. The first thing that comes to mind is that they must be gay. It isn't necessarily true.
Nevertheless, you have to live your life as you see fit. I simply wouldn't waste my mental energy on what label you need to wear for yourself. Life is a lot less constricting when you go without labels -- much the same as with clothes.![]()
Quite frankly, if someone dislikes you because they found out you suck cock in the privacy of your bedroom, is telling them you aren't really gay going to make a difference? If it does make a difference, then what kind of person are they?
It doesn't necessarily make the cuck gay or bi, no, if he is being 'forced' to do it within the situation. But it sure as hell makes you gay or bi.
There is a sexually available woman in the room. But you turn instead to a man to make you hard. And remember, in this situation, you are in control, unlike him. It is your choice to fuck his mouth, and not hers.
I don't have a problem with gay or bi people - why on earth would I? But self-delusion is worth calling out.
It doesn't necessarily make the cuck gay or bi, no, if he is being 'forced' to do it within the situation. But it sure as hell makes you gay or bi.
There is a sexually available woman in the room. But you turn instead to a man to make you hard. And remember, in this situation, you are in control, unlike him. It is your choice to fuck his mouth, and not hers.
I don't have a problem with gay or bi people - why on earth would I? But self-delusion is worth calling out.
When I was in my mid-forties, i developed an interest in exchanging oral with other guys. I resisted this interest but in time I accepted it enough to act on this interest and met up with another guy for a mutual encounter. It was important to me that the experience be on an equal basis in order to assuage my concerns that I might be gay. I decided that I was bi and I accepted that. However, after a few experiences it was obvious to me that I was not attracted to men even though I enjoyed hooking up with guys. I came to the conclusion that I enjoyed the thrill of doing a taboo act and giving sexual pleasure to my partners. I initially got over the thrill of hooking up and started surprising guys by letting them finish in my mouth - which gave them an unexpected thrill
I wish I were gay. I would save a ton of money in escorts. LOL.
I'm looking for my first bi experience in michigan. Don't consider myself bi. Live hot chicks but can't stop fantasizing about it. Love to try a hard cock in my mouth and from behind. I am beginning to believe this is more common in 40 something men than ppl think. Any thoughts
I would think the first logical question one should ask is: Who cares?
I suppose that if you are taking a lie detector test and they ask you if you are straight, there might be a problem. However, if you are not planning on leaving your wife/girlfriend, etc., then again what does it matter as long as you assure her you are not leaving her? If you are religious (for example Catholic), do you think telling your priest you suck cock for the love of your wife and not the love of the man or his penis makes a rats ass of difference to him?
That aside, if you must come up with labels for yourself, the next important question is: Don't you need to define "gay" before asking whether this particular thing defines you as "gay"? (In fact the answer to your question may fall out for you by how you define "gay".)
If you want to define "gay" similarly as they did in the old days with blacks in regards to race where one drop of African blood meant you were black, then by that definition a guy sucking cock is not 100% straight and therefore would fall into the gay category simply because the behavior isn't 100% straight. I say it is not 100% straight as the only way I can see a 100% straight guy sucking cock voluntarily is if a male he cares about (non-sexually/non-romantically) got bit by a spider/snake/etc and they were desperate to get the venom out before damaging the penis, then I would say that doesn't constitute a change in any sexuality label that the individual rendering the service had before the act. Now some gay porn male actors claim to do it only for the money; In my own opinion I would think at best they are bi.
I tend to agree with Mr. Briggs that sexuality is about love/romance -- not body parts. Besides, how many of us actually fit labels to a "t" anyway? What about a guy who craves all sex involving another guy -- like maybe a guy who would love to live full time in a bath house or an adult bookstore, but has no desire for any romantic flings with a guy (or for that matter a girl)? What about men who resent women yet love to fuck them; but have absolutely no desire to be tied romantically to one?
In my particular case, I love to sexually be inside the kind of guys who turn me on. I'm really not attracted to penises; but with my romantic interests, penises cum with the territory. I would be perfectly happy if men came with vaginas & wombs. Does that make me straight? I don't think so. Thus even for me, labels really don't do much...
The only purpose I see for labels is to make short cuts in the responsibility to get to know someone for who they really are. Yes they do serve their purpose. I'm physically and romantically attracted to masculine, hairy, muscular, adult, Caucasian bottoms. So I can save myself and others from wasted energy and time if I know those labels before considering a relationship. (Luckily, I've been off the market for almost 13 years.) However, for friendships it is best to get to know the person and punt the shortcut labels.
Keep in mind too that social norms and thus the labels associated with norms are influenced by the times and the culture they are part of. For instance, in the Philippines, it is very common for male best friends to hold hands or go arm and arm after work. To do the same with a woman might give her a really slutty reputation. Yet if you tried to call such guys "gay" (or use the term "billy boy"), they would get angry. Some cultures you also notice that it isn't unheard of for two guys to kiss (the non-tongue type of kiss). Again, they are not going to get it on..
Time wise, in my day most guys would not groom for minutes on end nor would guys cross their legs unless to make a table top kind of cross. For the last couple or so decades I have seen plenty of young men doing those behaviors. The first thing that comes to mind is that they must be gay. It isn't necessarily true.
Nevertheless, you have to live your life as you see fit. I simply wouldn't waste my mental energy on what label you need to wear for yourself. Life is a lot less constricting when you go without labels -- much the same as with clothes.![]()
Quite frankly, if someone dislikes you because they found out you suck cock in the privacy of your bedroom, is telling them you aren't really gay going to make a difference? If it does make a difference, then what kind of person are they?