One of GamerGate's Scariest Trolls is a Fake (And an Idiot)

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
NEWS FLASH KOTAKU... all those people hurling threats at Brianna Wu and Anita Sarkeesian, etc. are fake false flagging trolls. You just ran aground at the tip of the iceberg.

http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2015/02/25/scariest-trolls-fake

Comedy is a tough one. Satire is its tougher cousin. But we live in a world where anyone can upload as many videos as they can make, call themselves a satirist and claim to be 'pushing boundaries'.

In the case of Jan Rankowski - the 20-year-old recently outed by Buzzfeed as being behind the Jace Connors character, a mentally unstable-seeming YouTuber with a penchant for waving knives around and unhinged rants - the boundaries he was apparently pushing involved the go-to technique for any aspiring comedian: making violent threats to a woman who had been on the receiving end of dozens (hundreds?) of other threats.

Wait, did I say go-to technique? I meant 'a thing nobody trying to be a comedian - or person of any kind - should ever try to do'.

I'll admit I believed it. Rankowski and his chums at Million Dollar Extreme caught me in their self-titled satire. The rancour from certain types online had got to the point where I could believe a man with serious problems had crashed his car on the way to outspoken developer Brianna Wu's house with a load of weapons in the back of the vehicle. It's a relief, in a way, to know that serious violence wasn't in fact on the cards - that it was all a stupid joke.

Fooling me - fooling anyone - with that sort of thing doesn't bother me. Well done, that's my favourite kind of satire: the one where you end up questioning what you do or don't believe.

But Rankowski and his 'provocative' comedy partners removed any semblance of comedy from their Connors act thanks to one element I genuinely cannot get my head around: making actual threats to Brianna Wu. I don't give a shit how ludicrous those threats were. GamerGate's less stable followers had already whipped themselves up into a frenzy of such comical ludicrousness that anything was believable - and not just to me. Wu herself wrote about the threats from Connors. They had negatively affected her life.

But hey, it was a joke, right? Maybe. But it was a terrible joke. The sort of joke an idiot who doesn't understand what satire truly is or what empathy might be about makes. A cheap, easy jab without any thought for the potential ramifications it could have.

Instead of thinking, instead of coming up with something clever or unique to say on the matter of GamerGaters and their attitudes, Rankowski decided he would instead add his voice to the cacophony, 'parodying' them by, well, joining in. His screams would be shriller and louder, meaning they would be heard above the rest, but they were too similar to the other - genuine - ones, and ended up blending in, becoming part of what they were supposed to be satirising.

At that precise moment, any comic value the Jace Connors character might have had was lost. The best thing to do would have been to come clean, apologise profusely for the confusion - and fear - he caused, and to pack the character in. But it seems Rankowski only realised he was doing something that was rather stupid when he was found out, and the harassment crosshairs of 8Chan settled firmly on him.

Reading his interview with Buzzfeed is eye-opening. This is a young man who at no point acknowledges what he did with his "satirical" threats. He doesn't see it. He doesn't realise that the problem isn't with 8Chan's army of trolls or the harassment he's now facing - it's that he brought emotional pain and distress to someone who has been suffering a lot over the last few months. That stunning lack of empathy has riled me up. Angered me, even.
 
so if people receive death threats to them, their family and innocent bystanders.. your advice is to just assume it's a joke?
 
so if people receive death threats to them, their family and innocent bystanders.. your advice is to just assume it's a joke?
My advice is to assume the threats are coming from third party troublemakers. Of course, given your mental abilities and the limitations that this implies, you probably think this precludes arresting them.
 
My advice is to assume the threats are coming from third party troublemakers. Of course, given your mental abilities and the limitations that this implies, you probably think this precludes arresting them.

so if your children get rape threats... you're going to tell them to just assume it's third party trouble makers?
 
Yes, and I'm also going to hunt the third party bastards down.

How so? No one's been caught for threatening the massacre that was promised at Utah State for Anita Sarkeesian

what magic powers do you have,,, that the FBI do not?

and if it is a third party troublemaker.. what exactly would you do if you found them> threaten them? harrass them?

then you become the very person you rail about in the first place
 
How so? No one's been caught for threatening the massacre that was promised at Utah State for Anita Sarkeesian

what magic powers do you have,,, that the FBI do not?

and if it is a third party troublemaker.. what exactly would you do if you found them> threaten them? harrass them?

then you become the very person you rail about in the first place
Don't care. If they're dead they don't issue threats to my daughter ever again. Sometimes we gotta go back to the Old Testament with these fucktards. If we can find 'em.
 
Don't care. If they're dead they don't issue threats to my daughter ever again. Sometimes we gotta go back to the Old Testament with these fucktards. If we can find 'em.


So you think the " comedian" should be killed as well?

he made multiple threats towards Brianna Wu...or is she not someone's daughter?
 
So you think the " comedian" should be killed as well?

he made multiple threats towards Brianna Wu...or is she not someone's daughter?
Regarding the threats made to Brianna Wu, I got two words for a threatmongering fucktard like that

Drone
fucking
strike

(er, that's 3 words, I think. Hmmm.)

I don't care who he is. He issued death threats to someone just for putting out stupid feminist opinions on the Internet. Brianna Wu never threatened anyone that I know of. Drone strike, problem is done in one.

Was he a white dude? Drone strike.
Was he a MRA? Drone strike.
Hispanic bisexual? Drone strike.
Was he a male feminist? Drone strike.
Hetero? Drone strike.
Was he a Republican? Drone strike.
Democrat? Drone strike.
Libertarian? Drone strike.
Was he a transgendered black dude? Drone strike.
Was he actually a white woman posing as a man? Drone strike.
Oh and don't lemme forget the possibility of a black woman posing as a white dude. Drone strike.
Did I miss anyone? Drone strike!

Are we in any way ambiguous about where I stand here? I'm not even sure why you would ask this kind of silly question - it shows you clearly do not read what I write, and you are light years away from understanding me.
 
Back
Top