M
miles
Guest
What a fucking joke.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair.
The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
The nature of the copyrighted work
The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
What a fucking joke.
What a fucking joke.
3. Do not upload copyrighted images or post articles in their entirety. Fair use laws allow some posting of copyrighted material, such as excerpts from articles and screen captures from movies, under certain circumstances. Please do a Google search under "Fair Use" if you want to understand this issue better.
Hey shitslinger, am I on your buddy list? You can't wait to post right after me.
Fucknozzle.
What a fucking joke.
[Full quotation of copyrighted material reduced per our forum guidelines.]
I am not a fan of large C&P anyway.
If you read the article a sentence or two stood out. Post that, give your impressions about the rest of the article and link it. Not that hard, really.
I am not a fan of large C&P anyway.
If you read the article a sentence or two stood out. Post that, give your impressions about the rest of the article and link it. Not that hard, really.
No, it isn't that hard if one possesses moderate reading skills, the ability to think for one's self, and sufficient command of the language to articulate that thought into the written word.
If you imagine this place as a 1960's cocktail party with the neighbors, the clink of highball and martini glasses, can you conceive of people circulating with pages torn from Life and Time and pointing, "Look, read this!" and having no other interest in expressing themselves?
Like a mime convention.
When I first sauntered into the GB I was regularly accused of unattributed cut and paste. The idea that I might have that much to say on any given subject from thoughts formed in my very own mind and conveyed by my own hunt-and-peck keystrokes was foreign to many.
Then it became, "Cite??" demanding I cut and paste to "bolster" my opinions. Not everyone can express themselves well in writing. It takes some gear-shifting to take a concept in your head, and not only convert that to language, but then type it out. The spoken word is much more natural a process than reading and writing is. This should be a self-selecting population, though. People that choose to engage with others using the written word.
I wonder, sometimes, what some of these people are like as actual conversationalists? Some, from their writing, has me imagining fantastic, illuminating conversation, but maybe the are shy or halting of speech in real life. Maybe some that cannot cobble their thoughts together on paper are fascinating raconteurs in what is inaccurately labeled "real life."
Gives me an idea for a thread. I'll have to think about how to do it though.
If you imagine this place as a 1960's cocktail party with the neighbors, the clink of highball and martini glasses, can you conceive of people circulating with pages torn from Life and Time and pointing, "Look, read this!" and having no other interest in expressing themselves?
Like a mime convention.
When I first sauntered into the GB I was regularly accused of unattributed cut and paste. The idea that I might have that much to say on any given subject from thoughts formed in my very own mind and conveyed by my own hunt-and-peck keystrokes was foreign to many.
Then it became, "Cite??" demanding I cut and paste to "bolster" my opinions. Not everyone can express themselves well in writing. It takes some gear-shifting to take a concept in your head, and not only convert that to language, but then type it out. The spoken word is much more natural a process than reading and writing is. This should be a self-selecting population, though. People that choose to engage with others using the written word.
I wonder, sometimes, what some of these people are like as actual conversationalists? Some, from their writing, has me imagining fantastic, illuminating conversation, but maybe the are shy or halting of speech in real life. Maybe some that cannot cobble their thoughts together on paper are fascinating raconteurs in what is inaccurately labeled "real life."
Gives me an idea for a thread. I'll have to think about how to do it though.
When you first arrived on the GB, you routinely ascribed outlandish positions to your political opponents. "Studies have shown that most libruls actually enjoy molesting children at some point in their lives!" ...that sort of deliberate poke-in-the-eye stuff that is considered the height of bon mot repartee amongst you second-tier beta males.
Naturally, when we challenged you to back up your specious claims, you folded faster than Superman on laundry day.
heaven forbid the owners of literotica, a website dedicated writing, protect the rights of all authors on the internet, by following copyright law.
fucking idiot.
When you first arrived on the GB, you routinely ascribed outlandish positions to your political opponents. "Studies have shown that most libruls actually enjoy molesting children at some point in their lives!" ...that sort of deliberate poke-in-the-eye stuff that is considered the height of bon mot repartee amongst you second-tier beta males.
Naturally, when we challenged you to back up your specious claims, you folded faster than Superman on laundry day.