GOP Congress on the verge of a meltdown

Ulaven_Demorte

Non-Prophet Organization
Joined
Apr 16, 2006
Posts
30,016
The coming political breakdown between the immovable Republican House and the irresistible GOP Senate on funding for the Department of Homeland Security was both entirely predictable and predicted.

In fact, two weeks after the election this past November I predicted it in this post. I said, “…the sides have already been drawn and the battle – no, the war – among congressional Republicans on the federal budget is well underway.”

The Republican vs. Republican budget war is now wide open for all to see. The House’s intransigence on this particular issue — it insists that the DHS appropriation include language that somehow reverses President Obama’s executive orders on immigration -– is being matched by the Senate’s unwillingness to take the steps needed either to match what the House wants or develop its own alternative.

And, as I also predicted, the unwillingness of Senate Democrats to provide any votes for their GOP colleagues even on issues where there is some agreement has backed Republicans so far into a political corner that it’s not at all clear how they will fight their way out.

This is not an aberration over the very hot button immigration issue: No matter how this showdown ends, it’s virtually certain to be repeated over and over and over again this year on everything budget-related.

More here: http://www.forbes.com/sites/stancollender/2015/02/17/gop-congress-on-the-verge-of-a-meltdown/

My comments:

As I've stated before, the Republican House is treating the Republican controlled Senate exactly the same way it treated the Democratic controlled Senate, and is getting the same result. For some reason the House Republicans believe that the Senate's job is to pass whatever the House sends them. The Republican vs. Republican warfare truly broke out into the open last week with everyone from Speaker John Boehner to Rep. Raul Labrador saying it was time for the Senate to grow a pair and act on the DHS appropriation the way the House wants. Proving that the GOP has zero clue what the word compromise means. They keep sending the same bill to the Senate, expecting it to somehow pass when it failed before. Even if they manage to pass the DHS bill in it's current form they won't be able to override an assured Presidential veto, they simply don't have the votes.

I figure by the time the 2016 elections roll around the Republican congress will have proved beyond a doubt that they are incapable of performing their duties as legislators.
 
Last edited:
Lol... Where are the gop apologists? What a huge shock they haven't been allll over this thread with their brilliance!


The "adults" as Mitch McConnell actually called them, are in charge now. Nothings changed either.. Except the spotlight is now fully on their ineptness.
 
this is awesome!


two of lits cross dressers in one post! UD - the boy in tights and CowpooSlinger, first man in history that a thong, while wearing backwards, provides enough coverage and then some....

you go tiny men, you go! the obama loves you, now drink your cuckold juice
 
I wonder which side the apologists are going to take:

The House of Orange or the Senate Hound Dogs?
 
Hey! It's fatassjerryinflorida! Hi!

Yer obese, unemployed and drawing gubmint assistance from Uncle Obama.. You can't hide your love for him.. It's evident..


Better? :)
 
Last edited:
Please don't quote NeverEndingMoron when you respond to it. The collective IQ of the US drops a couple of points every time someone repeats it's idiocy.
 
This lot would gridlock if they had to vote on an "Obama: Threat or Menace?" resolution. "Threat!" "No, menace!" [fight breaks out]
 
These "best and brightest" would break out in a brawl over "Tastes Great" or "Less Filling"
 
Senate Republican Rand Paul:

"The disappointing thing about the Democrats is they don’t seem to be able to get beyond partisanship to actually address important issues so I think there’s an important constitutional issue here between the separation of powers,” Paul said in an exclusive interview while on a trip. “It would be nice, I think, if some of the Democrats stood up and said ‘you know what? We need to reassert Congress’ authority even though this is a Democrat president. I will vote for congressional power here as opposed to presidential power.’ But not many of them will do it. In fact, right now none of them will.”

A Republican, especially Rand Paul, trying to chastise anyone else about partisanship is fucking hilarious. This statement boils down to the same tired bullshit that House Republicans have been spouting all along. "The Senate needs to pass our bill."
 
this is awesome!


two of lits cross dressers in one post! UD - the boy in tights and CowpooSlinger, first man in history that a thong, while wearing backwards, provides enough coverage and then some....

you go tiny men, you go! the obama loves you, now drink your cuckold juice

You are ugly and half crazy. :devil:
 
something so sexy about a man, that can wear a thong ... reversed non the less, and still be covered that's so sexy

well, for a cuckold and union coward :kiss:
 
WHATEVER ITS merits or shortcomings, a federal judge’s decision last week blocking the Obama administration’s immigration policy offered congressional Republicans an escape path from the corner into which they had painted themselves by imperiling funding for the Department of Homeland Security and its 240,000 employees. Thus far they have not shown the wisdom to accept this gift.

It’s hard to grasp the logic that would impel GOP lawmakers to suspend funding for the gigantic department when the move that inspired their threat in the first place — President Obama’s executive action shielding millions of illegal immigrants from deportation — has been put on hold. Why not treat the policy issue as moot, which it is for the time being, and keep funds flowing?

The answer, it seems, is that the fervor of Republican partisanship, especially in the House, is immune to logic beyond an insistence on victory at any cost — the cost in this case being the imminent shutdown of a critical chunk of the federal government.

....

On taking control of both houses of Congress, Republican leaders pledged to avoid further government shutdowns. They then set precisely the opposite course — a course seemingly designed to prove they are incapable of governing.

The rest here: On Homeland Security funding, Republicans govern without logic
 
we must make those that break the law, legal citizens.


after all, these people will most likely vote for the obaNa kind

Power to the criminals, power to the Cuckold obaNa
 
I believe that the reason the GOP has refused to strip the immigration issue from DHS funding after the decision last week and let the courts decide the issue is that they are pretty sure that the courts will decide against them and are unwilling to accept that possibility.

Once again the GOP proves that it's more than willing to put American lives in danger to try to score a win, even if the point of their intransigence has been rendered moot.
 
I believe that the reason the GOP has refused to strip the immigration issue from DHS funding after the decision last week and let the courts decide the issue is that they are pretty sure that the courts will decide against them and are unwilling to accept that possibility.

Once again the GOP proves that it's more than willing to put American lives in danger to try to score a win, even if the point of their intransigence has been rendered moot.

"Put American lives in danger"? I think you are overestimating the value of DHS.
 
Back
Top