ISL has infiltrated Montana government

someoneyouknow

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Posts
28,274
ISL has apparently found a way to circumvent election laws and substituted one of its members for a fat white guy:


A Montana legislative panel moved to kill an indecent exposure bill Wednesday after the lawmaker who introduced it said he thinks yoga pants should be illegal.

Members of the House Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to table House Bill 365, which Rep. David Moore introduced Tuesday.

The proposal would have expanded the definition of indecent exposure to include garments that give the appearance of a person's buttocks, genitals, pelvis or female nipple.

The Republican from Missoula said he wouldn't have a problem with people being arrested for wearing such provocative clothing such as tight-fitting beige garments. Moore also said yoga pants should be illegal.

Although members of the committee giggled about the bill, no discussion was allowed before a voice vote to table it.

Moore and retired professor Walt Hill drafted HB 365 after last year's Bare as you Dare bicycle event outraged some residents last summer. Fearing that denying organizers an event permit would breach free speech, city officials allowed participants, many of them completely nude, to ride through downtown Missoula on Aug. 17.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1991 that state prohibitions on public nudity are constitutional given that nudity itself is not an expression. Bare as you Dare organizers call the event a celebration of body image and bicyclists' right to use public roads.

Currently, a person convicted of indecent exposure three times in Montana can be sentenced to life in jail and up to $10,000.

http://abcnews.go.com/Weird/wireStory/montana-lawmaker-yoga-pants-illegal-28903991
 
so lemme see if I understand this

you are comparing an idiotic PROPOSAL....(that has as much a chance of passing as you do to become an UNNIGGER) to murderers and wild eyed killers?

how cute:rolleyes:


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B9qCvjqIMAA-qzH.jpg

In both situations it is the women who have to suffer because men are apparently unable to control themselves. Instead of changing their behavior and not getting a boner every time they see a bit of skin or the outline of a body wearing clothes which hugs the body, it is apparently easier to simply force women to cover up in burlap sacks.

Witness a similar situation in neighboring Utah where a girl was forced to wear a jacket at a dance because, *GASP!*, she had a dress which showed her shoulders:

https://www.yahoo.com/parenting/high-schooler-told-to-cover-up-for-exposing-her-109503228597.html

The exact same reason was given: boys seeing bare shoulders might have unseemly thoughts so it was easier to force her to cover up.
 
Back
Top