Househusband backlash as high-flying wives ditch men they wanted to stay at home

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...g-wives-ditch-men-em-em-wanted-stay-home.html

"I sensed that Louise was becoming more detached and less interested in me sexually within a year of becoming a househusband," says Richard, 50. "She was always picking on me for silly little things she said I hadn't done, like the washing up or not tidying away the toys.

"It was as if she was losing all respect for me, just because I was the one at home, doing the domesworktic duties. Then, one day two years ago, she announced she was leaving me - and taking the children with her. She told me she was going to go and live with her mother 20 miles away. To say I was devastated does not do my feelings justice. It was as if the bottom had fallen out of my world."

For five years Richard, from Watford, Herts, had worked hard to become a perfect "mother" to their sons, Jack, who is now nine, and Edward, seven. But from the moment he gave up his job, Richard says Louise, 47, failed to see him as a "man".

The phenomenon of the househusband is an increasingly popular one. The number of men deciding to become househusbands has increased by a staggering 83per cent since 1993. According to recent figures from the Office for National Statistics, there are more than 200,000 fathers in the UK choosing to give up their careers and raise their children at home.

But are the couples who go down this domestic route sowing the seeds of marital disharmony? It seems that in many cases the rise of modern career women has had an unexpected - and disastrous - knock-on effect on many husbands who assume the traditionally 'female' role.

In short, having a man whose primary function is not as alpha male breadwinner, but domestic drudge just ain't sexy.

Divorce lawyer Vanessa Lloyd-Platt says that in her experience, the decision to allow the wife to be the main wage earner will have a detrimental effect on as many as half of these relationships, and that divorce statistics in these cases have risen by at least five per cent in the past two years.
 
Well of course. Women are naturally hypergamous, hard wired to want someone st
with more resources.
 
Well of course. Women are naturally hypergamous, hard wired to want someone st
with more resources.
And they don't even pay alimony or child support when they walk out.

Female privilege run amuck.
 
And they don't even pay alimony or child support when they walk out.

Female privilege run amuck.

why would they pay child support when they take the kids with them?

They get their come uppance later. A 47 year old single mom is pretty low on the sexual totem pole. She will never replace him, will likely never have anything remotely close to a serious relationship. On the other hand he will recycle himself sexually just fine.
 
why would they pay child support when they take the kids with them?

They get their come uppance later. A 47 year old single mom is pretty low on the sexual totem pole. She will never replace him, will likely never have anything remotely close to a serious relationship. On the other hand he will recycle himself sexually just fine.
The Richard dude, yes, but not the James dude. Read about how Richard is paying alimony even though he had no damned job and she did. Plus she cheated him out of those kids. This is what we can expect more of with modern feminism: men earn less for five whole years but when the marriage ends he's the one paying spousal support.

And in Richard's case I don't see her getting any comeuppance when he's the one who's paying spousal support.
 
Back
Top