Que
aʒɑ̃ prɔvɔkatœr
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Posts
- 39,882
Dude, Rob isn't shy about being controversial. I've cringed at times at things he said to various posters over the years. His very long history more than adequately supports his lack of need for alts.
Besides, he's far too creative to have the lame alts you're attributing to him. Give it a rest already.
Also, keep in mind he had the little post ready to trot out, outlining, just as you did, that he has no need to use alts to be offensive.
Sean postulates it is a psychopath (agreed) that enjoys stirring things up (no argument there.)
Of all the psychopaths on the board, why would that leave Rob out? Who, better than Rob, has established his plausible deniability by repeatedly asserting (as he has here) that he needs no alts.
On the surface, it actually makes sense that he can be as offensive as he wants, but he does try to compartmentalize all that. He tends to be the most offensive in threads where he assumes "teh ladeez" are not present.
Rob is well aware that most people assume all of his vitriol is on one ID. What moral line would he have to cross to "poke fun" as he calls it using an alt? Lying about it? Oh, not our boyscout Rob, never!