Selma, Let The Whining Begin

MrBates2

Loves Spam
Joined
Feb 18, 2012
Posts
831
Count Spike Lee among those who were annoyed by Selma's snub in the major Oscar categories (the film only received two nominations: for best picture and best song), but he says the fact that star David Oyelowo and director Ava DuVernay didn't receive nominations doesn't diminish the quality of the movie.

"If I saw Ava today I'd say, 'You know what? Fuck 'em. You made a very good film, so feel good about that and start working on the next one,' " Lee told The Daily Beast in a previously scheduled interview that took place hours after the Oscar nominations were announced on Thursday.

Lee also weighed in on the all-white acting nominees, only the second time that's happened in nearly two decades, and a far cry from last year when 12 Years a Slave stars Lupita Nyong'o and Chiwetel Ejiofor were up for best supporting actress and best actor and Captain Phillips' Barkhad Abdi earned a best supporting actor nomination. But Lee's not surprised by the lack of diversity.

"Anyone who thinks this year was gonna be like last year is retarded," Lee added. "There were a lot of black folks up there with 12 Years a Slave, [director] Steve [McQueen], Lupita, Pharrell. It's in cycles of every 10 years. Once every 10 years or so I get calls from journalists about how people are finally accepting black films. Before last year, it was the year [in 2002] with Halle Berry, Denzel [Washington] and Sidney Poitier. It's a 10-year cycle. So I don't start doing backflips when it happens."

He said the composition of the Academy is what really explains why certain films and performances are nominated.

"Let's be honest. I know they're trying to become more diverse, but when you look at the Academy and Do the Right Thing or Driving Miss Daisy, are they going to choose a film where you have the relatively passive black servant, or are they going to choose a film with a menacing 'Radio Raheem?' " asked Lee. "A lot of times, people are going to vote for what they're comfortable with, and anything that's threatening to them they won't."

Lee's Do The Right Thing failed to receive a best picture nomination in 1989, when Driving Miss Daisy ended up winning the top prize. But, again, he doesn't think Oscar nominations necessarily validate a film.
 
Count Spike Lee among those who were annoyed by Selma's snub in the major Oscar categories (the film only received two nominations: for best picture and best song), but he says the fact that star David Oyelowo and director Ava DuVernay didn't receive nominations doesn't diminish the quality of the movie.

"If I saw Ava today I'd say, 'You know what? Fuck 'em. You made a very good film, so feel good about that and start working on the next one,' " Lee told The Daily Beast in a previously scheduled interview that took place hours after the Oscar nominations were announced on Thursday.

*snip*

by Hilary Lewis 1/16/2015 10:11am PST

Count Spike Lee among those who were annoyed by Selma's snub in the major Oscar categories (the film only received two nominations: for best picture and best song), but he says the fact that star David Oyelowo and director Ava DuVernay didn't receive nominations doesn't diminish the quality of the movie.

"If I saw Ava today I'd say, 'You know what? Fuck 'em. You made a very good film, so feel good about that and start working on the next one,' " Lee told The Daily Beast in a previously scheduled interview that took place hours after the Oscar nominations were announced on Thursday.


http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/spike-lee-selma-oscar-snub-764336

MrBates2 = Hilary Lewis?

Hi, Hilary!

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_me44snUaAR1qa6g1m.gif
 
Sour grapes.

We need an exclusive Best Black category.
 
Let's be honest though. If a film were made that distorted MLK's legacy, as this film distorts LBJ's, there would be an uproar.
 
I haven't seen the movie, but what Lee says about the cycle is true. What is the problem. Also, In response to the lack of diversity a reporter called him and asked him questions. This interview is the result of that. This isn't whining. Whining is always unsolicited.
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen the movie, but what Lee says about the cycle is true. What is the problem. Also, In response to the lack of diversity a reporter called him and asked him questions. This interview is the result of that. This isn't whining. Whining is always unsolicited.

Bates just saw something "controversial" about black people on the internet again and like all useless interchangeable meme vectors fixated on race, decided to seagull shit it here and fly out.

Let's be honest though. If a film were made that distorted MLK's legacy, as this film distorts LBJ's, there would be an uproar.

Explain LBJ's "legacy" and then explain how the movie "distorts" LBJ's "legacy."

I mean, really explain, like you actually saw the movie and shit.
 
Last edited:
What's LBJ'S *legacy*?

That's been quite a question down here in Texas the past week.

Evidently, LBJ had a complicated relationship with minorities. He didn't particularly "like" them, but he used them to promote his liberal agenda. Very Rashomon around here, people seeing the side of LBJ they want to see. The film evidently gives a very "one note" view of LBJ, as a political opportunist (which he certainly was).
 
I haven't seen the movie, but what Lee says about the cycle is true. What is the problem. Also, In response to the lack of diversity a reporter called him and asked him questions. This interview is the result of that. This isn't whining. Whining is always unsolicited.

Talent is in short supply this year down in the hood.
 
a solid republican south

What's LBJ'S *legacy*?

After LBJ passed the civil rights act the democrats lost the south. All the racist ran to the open arms of the republican party, where they festered for a few years until they became what we now think of as the tea party wing of the party.

LBJ knew this would happen when he signed the civil rights act. He told his party that they would lose the south for a generation. Now fifty years later we see he underestimated the hatred of the bigots almost as much as the republicans did.

I am sure that the moderate members of the republican party, if they still exist, must regret the decision to welcome them.
 
After LBJ passed the civil rights act the democrats lost the south. All the racist ran to the open arms of the republican party, where they festered for a few years until they became what we now think of as the tea party wing of the party.

LBJ knew this would happen when he signed the civil rights act. He told his party that they would lose the south for a generation. Now fifty years later we see he underestimated the hatred of the bigots almost as much as the republicans did.

I am sure that the moderate members of the republican party, if they still exist, must regret the decision to welcome them.

That's not the definition of a legacy.
 
I haven't seen the movie, but what Lee says about the cycle is true. What is the problem. Also, In response to the lack of diversity a reporter called him and asked him questions. This interview is the result of that. This isn't whining. Whining is always unsolicited.


Yeah, I didn't see any whining either. Plus there was the mention that the interview with Lee had been scheduled ahead of time -- it's logical it would have touched on the big news of the day.

I was a little surprised Selma didn't get more nominations because it's the sort of movie that the Academy usually fawns over -- and it even has British actors in most of the key roles, something else the Academy tends to favor. But I can't say whether it "should have" received more nominations or not, because I'm not qualified to offer an opinion.
 
Yeah, I didn't see any whining either. Plus there was the mention that the interview with Lee had been scheduled ahead of time -- it's logical it would have touched on the big news of the day.

I was a little surprised Selma didn't get more nominations because it's the sort of movie that the Academy usually fawns over -- and it even has British actors in most of the key roles, something else the Academy tends to favor. But I can't say whether it "should have" received more nominations or not, because I'm not qualified to offer an opinion.

Here's the rub.

There are no white savior narratives in Selma to boost industry profiles with, and so...

http://media.giphy.com/media/KYNywoibU1PQ4/giphy.gif
 
Poor, poor GB progressives/liberals bigots/racists...

...once they were certain their utopia would finally arrive when all the old, white men died.

Now, as the overwhelmingly progressive/liberal Academy proves...

...their utopia must wait until everyone in the world except the poor, poor GB progressives/liberals bigots/racists die off.

The intolerant bunch of bigoted mofos won't be happy...

...until none but they and their special flavor of racism are left standing.
 
Poor, poor GB progressives/liberals bigots/racists...

...once they were certain their utopia would finally arrive when all the old, white men died.

Now, as the overwhelmingly progressive/liberal Academy proves...

...their utopia must wait until everyone in the world except the poor, poor GB progressives/liberals bigots/racists die off.

The intolerant bunch of bigoted mofos won't be happy...

...until none but they and their special flavor of racism are left standing.

fuck off eyer the liar
 
Yeah, I didn't see any whining either. Plus there was the mention that the interview with Lee had been scheduled ahead of time -- it's logical it would have touched on the big news of the day.

I was a little surprised Selma didn't get more nominations because it's the sort of movie that the Academy usually fawns over -- and it even has British actors in most of the key roles, something else the Academy tends to favor. But I can't say whether it "should have" received more nominations or not, because I'm not qualified to offer an opinion.

Most of the people voting were around when Selma happened and recall LBJ. The niggaz took a step too far demonizing the man, and earned a big ZERO for Oprah. Or maybe its a FU to all the nigga malcontents.
 
But is the movie any good?

It didn't need to be. We were supposed to rush out and see it because we're not racists and we were supposed to boycott sniper because of the empty chair and now that that did not happen in the free market, the Left is hopping mad witness Rogan and Moore...

;)

It should have zero competition for any awards and the cowardly killer should not have been nominated for anything.
 
Back
Top