Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
chillywilly2
AKA Bean
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2002
- Posts
- 16,674
Noor
Citizen of the World
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2003
- Posts
- 32,228
Because the current assumption is that Islamic militants were behind the attack in response to some cartoons of a religious nature?
chillywilly2
AKA Bean
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2002
- Posts
- 16,674
Thats better
But I don't think they were militants....just standard everyday Muslims
But I don't think they were militants....just standard everyday Muslims
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
chillywilly2
AKA Bean
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2002
- Posts
- 16,674
they say
they are AL Q
they scream ALLAH AKBAR
they say ALLAH IS AVENGED
and its the CURRENT ASSUMPTION.....what will change the current assumption? Kahana abortion Buddhist Pope screaming something else
Don't be jumping to conclusions...that could just piss off the moderates....then where would we be
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Don't be jumping to conclusions...that could just piss off the moderates....then where would we be
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6v33BbIcAEb0q7.png
richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
Don't be jumping to conclusions...that could just piss off the moderates....then where would we be
Yes, because busybody has the ear of the muslim world. They wait on his 100 posts every day, starting at 4am, and ending at midnight...
The reality is that no one cares what the washed up bugs bunny shirt wearing mother fucker has to say.
girlsmiley
catastrophe
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2010
- Posts
- 22,148
Truth.
Disgustipated
LAWLZ
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Posts
- 25,596
@PzFeed: New Yorker's cartoonist's response to Paris attack https://twitter.com/aljwhite/status/552826519169802240/photo/1 Via @amolrajan
Balladeer08
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2010
- Posts
- 4,101
And France invited these people into their country, feeling very superior for having done so.
Surprise! A religion that does not recognize tolerance and freedom of religion is acting intolerantly. And trying to impose Sharia law.
They should send them back to their original countries.
Well, give the women the option to stay. That would be humanitarian. Sending them back to be treated like draft animals seems more than a bit cruel.
Surprise! A religion that does not recognize tolerance and freedom of religion is acting intolerantly. And trying to impose Sharia law.
They should send them back to their original countries.
Well, give the women the option to stay. That would be humanitarian. Sending them back to be treated like draft animals seems more than a bit cruel.
Balladeer08
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2010
- Posts
- 4,101
I see it as both political and religious. As the Muslims seem to want to have a Theocracy, they are really inseparable.
M
miles
Guest
Here’s what will happen next.
1. French authorities will urge the public not to jump to any unhelpful conclusions about the identity and motivation of the killers.
2. Politicians, police chiefs and mainstream media reports will urge restraint over what is clearly an inexplicable rogue incident which may have nothing whatsoever to do with the Religion of Peace.
3. Extensive – and largely fruitless – efforts will be made to find Muslim community leaders prepared to speak out against the incident, in the unlikely event that it proves that the killers may have had Islamist sympathies.
4. Liberal commentators will take pains to draw a distinction between Islamism and Islam, noting that the former is a malign perversion of the latter which (apparently) explicitly forbids the murder of innocents.
5. Warming to this theme – and once the bodies are sufficiently cold, so as not to offend anyone’s good taste – one or two braver liberal commentators will suggest that while, of course, they wholly condemn all such acts of violence, it’s nevertheless the case that one or two of Charlie Hebdo’s editorials and cartoons could be quite needlessly provocative and that their contribution to the current climate of Islamophobia may have been responsible for heightening religious tensions in the broader culture. There have to be limits to free speech, after all. You can’t shout fire in a crowded theatre.
6. The BBC, The Guardian and their fellow travellers will despatch reporters to Bradford, Luton, Rotherham, Birmingham, Tower Hamlets etc with a view to proving that Islamophobic incidents have increased as a result of unfortunate events in Paris. Campaign organisation Tell Mama will confirm that this has been the case, citing the fact that there have been lots of angry tweets on Twitter.
7. On a BBC youth debate programme the audience will be canvassed as to their views on the cause of the increased tensions. To a man – and regardless of whether or not they are themselves Muslim – they will blame only two factors: “foreign policy” and “Islamophobia.” A young, attractive, female Muslim on the panel will win massive applause from the audience by dissociating herself and her co-religionists from the actions of the killers, explaining that though they may have thought they were acting in the name of Islam they weren’t, actually, because they just weren’t. So that’s OK then.
8. Politicians will bravely call for more money, much more money, to be spent on outreach programmes to the Muslim community in order to prevent further radicalisation. Later, it will be discovered that the Community Leaders who have been selected to participate in these programmes are not moderates who have much sympathy with the idea of cultural cohesion and who have only identified themselves as “community leaders” by dint of their vociferousness.
9. The Prime Minister will make a rousing speech declaring that “The terrorists will never be allowed to win.” To prevent future incidents, new laws will be passed forbidding newspapers and magazines from running satirical articles or cartoons which may offend religious sensibilities. These laws, however, will be entirely unnecessary: from now on, no one will dare.
10. Within a month, the incident will largely be forgotten. Just like the Mumbai and Nairobi massacres were. Sophisticated commentators will recognise that though, of course what happened was pretty frightful and all that, it’s important to appreciate that your chances of being killed in a terrorist incident are way smaller than being, say, run over by a bus and that actually all we’re doing when we overreact to such incidents is placing undue emphasis on what are, after all, just rogue criminal acts and not the end of civilisation.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-s...lie-hebdo-massacre-how-the-west-will-respond/
1. French authorities will urge the public not to jump to any unhelpful conclusions about the identity and motivation of the killers.
2. Politicians, police chiefs and mainstream media reports will urge restraint over what is clearly an inexplicable rogue incident which may have nothing whatsoever to do with the Religion of Peace.
3. Extensive – and largely fruitless – efforts will be made to find Muslim community leaders prepared to speak out against the incident, in the unlikely event that it proves that the killers may have had Islamist sympathies.
4. Liberal commentators will take pains to draw a distinction between Islamism and Islam, noting that the former is a malign perversion of the latter which (apparently) explicitly forbids the murder of innocents.
5. Warming to this theme – and once the bodies are sufficiently cold, so as not to offend anyone’s good taste – one or two braver liberal commentators will suggest that while, of course, they wholly condemn all such acts of violence, it’s nevertheless the case that one or two of Charlie Hebdo’s editorials and cartoons could be quite needlessly provocative and that their contribution to the current climate of Islamophobia may have been responsible for heightening religious tensions in the broader culture. There have to be limits to free speech, after all. You can’t shout fire in a crowded theatre.
6. The BBC, The Guardian and their fellow travellers will despatch reporters to Bradford, Luton, Rotherham, Birmingham, Tower Hamlets etc with a view to proving that Islamophobic incidents have increased as a result of unfortunate events in Paris. Campaign organisation Tell Mama will confirm that this has been the case, citing the fact that there have been lots of angry tweets on Twitter.
7. On a BBC youth debate programme the audience will be canvassed as to their views on the cause of the increased tensions. To a man – and regardless of whether or not they are themselves Muslim – they will blame only two factors: “foreign policy” and “Islamophobia.” A young, attractive, female Muslim on the panel will win massive applause from the audience by dissociating herself and her co-religionists from the actions of the killers, explaining that though they may have thought they were acting in the name of Islam they weren’t, actually, because they just weren’t. So that’s OK then.
8. Politicians will bravely call for more money, much more money, to be spent on outreach programmes to the Muslim community in order to prevent further radicalisation. Later, it will be discovered that the Community Leaders who have been selected to participate in these programmes are not moderates who have much sympathy with the idea of cultural cohesion and who have only identified themselves as “community leaders” by dint of their vociferousness.
9. The Prime Minister will make a rousing speech declaring that “The terrorists will never be allowed to win.” To prevent future incidents, new laws will be passed forbidding newspapers and magazines from running satirical articles or cartoons which may offend religious sensibilities. These laws, however, will be entirely unnecessary: from now on, no one will dare.
10. Within a month, the incident will largely be forgotten. Just like the Mumbai and Nairobi massacres were. Sophisticated commentators will recognise that though, of course what happened was pretty frightful and all that, it’s important to appreciate that your chances of being killed in a terrorist incident are way smaller than being, say, run over by a bus and that actually all we’re doing when we overreact to such incidents is placing undue emphasis on what are, after all, just rogue criminal acts and not the end of civilisation.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-s...lie-hebdo-massacre-how-the-west-will-respond/
Wrong Element
Sentient Onion
- Joined
- May 5, 2002
- Posts
- 24,909
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Le Penn will win
chillywilly2
AKA Bean
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2002
- Posts
- 16,674
^^^^ Islamaphobe
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Disgustipated
LAWLZ
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Posts
- 25,596
@PzFeed: Google has added a black ribbon to it's France homepage https://www.google.fr/ - http://twitter.com/CCTV_America/status/552895850499039232/photo/1
Disgustipated
LAWLZ
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Posts
- 25,596
@PzFeed: A Jewish Man distributes coffee to reporters at the scene after gunmen stormed a French newspaper, in Paris. AP http://twitter.com/VINNews/status/552913516437319680/photo/1
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
It is a culture, a raiding culture, using a religion for justification. This religion, in particular, was written by a raiding culture, on that is pre-industrial and that relies on conquest to sustain itself eschewing labor as being ignoble, suited only to slaves and women, not that they see too much of a difference between the two groups. They are not migrating to Europe for jobs as much as they are attracted by the easy looting made possible by social-welfare states.
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
No, they have cultures that employ violence to gain control and use religion as a self-justification.
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
It is political. It is economic. It is about gaining power.
