Issues with new LIT Chat?
- Thread starter Branvsc
- Start date
Que
aʒɑ̃ prɔvɔkatœr
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Posts
- 39,882
I am so glad you brought this to the attention of the General Board. The team of LitChat technicians that are supposed to be available 24/7 to address these sort of concerns can often be found loafing about the GB chatting up the ladeez and what-not. I hope that being called out here for their deficiencies spurs them to take action and get it working again.
artemesia_g
Your dog is a jackass.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2008
- Posts
- 2,904
Oh, god, noooooooooo.
lovetoread
hello daddy
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2001
- Posts
- 42,978
Hah.
Betcha thought these were over.
Betcha thought these were over.
Que
aʒɑ̃ prɔvɔkatœr
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Posts
- 39,882
Such a blessing that technology is finicky.
Chat down, and find me a story were always my favorites.
Que
aʒɑ̃ prɔvɔkatœr
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Posts
- 39,882
I went there once recently. I have not done crack, but there was nothing addictive about chat. If handles were any indication... not sure I was missing out.
What I don't get is how is chatting in a scroll better than chatting in posts?
SolarHomo
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2014
- Posts
- 401
For some it's QVC or base jumping. If it lights up your brain, it owns you.
Littlefinger
dead account
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2009
- Posts
- 1,687
There is something intimate about talking to someone in real-time. Went through that phase myself where I used a lot of chat programs to talk to people. It is completely different, especially when you don't have to refresh the page to see who's responded to you. And chatting one on one is different than a group, real-time chat.
Forum posting is like reading an article where somebody has read something someone else has said and is responding to it, and then the other person responds to the critique. Chat programs are like talking on the phone or being in a room with a small group of people. It's more organic, the flow of conversation and responses and it's not always sexual in nature. In fact, most places I've been to with adult members discourage anything beyond playful flirting in the public chat program, just because it's kind of boring and/or awkward for folks not involved to sit there watching while two people cyber.
parodyluvr75
Owl of Minerva
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2012
- Posts
- 17,808
Meet me in chat, baby.
It's working fine for me. Birdiestandingonlitchatserverdrinkingcoffee69
Que
aʒɑ̃ prɔvɔkatœr
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Posts
- 39,882
I get that as far as it goes. but that is after I am more or less engaged in a one-on-one conversation. For that, for at least ten years there is always skype, yahoo, text or phone.
Wife of Bath
Personals Mod. Again
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Posts
- 6,418
Sorry, I keep breaking it with my nude camming.
thør
Karhu-er
- Joined
- May 29, 2002
- Posts
- 92,166
And, I appreciate that.
Because every time you lean over your boobs hit the off switch?
Wife of Bath
Personals Mod. Again
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Posts
- 6,418
Yep, blame me and Thor, in there totally cybering. Hard. So hard.
Yes. I control the internet via electrical switches in my apartment, and I flick the chat on/off switch constantly just to fuck with people.
Last edited:
Littlefinger
dead account
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2009
- Posts
- 1,687
Then it's the group chat they're going for? I mean, those chat programs only work if you have friends already.
Like I said, the conversation of a group chat is more organic than a forum where you can edit your posts and they're usually long winded and involve less talking/chatting and more "discussion/debate". And if they're desperate for the chat prgram on this site when there are so many other sites that offer such as part of their forum interface, then I can only assume they are looking for titilating chat in a group setting. It's like if the more memorable members here were all online at the same time, it'd be almost exactly like sitting in the same room with them talking about whatever comes up.
