How the Global Warming Scare Began

[FGB]

Interesting.

about 8 minutes in.


How the Global Warming Scare Began

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyUDGfCNC-k

 

[unregistered]

 

[FGB]

A liberal invention to fleece the West for the benefit of the Third World and big world government.

Looks like it is even simpler than that, although some people are not above using anything that will further their cause.

 

[unregistered]

 

[phrodeau]

A manufactured crisis - perfect description. It took decades of burning fossil fuels to accomplish it, but manufactured it is.

 

[miles]

The Global Warming Hoax Explained for Dummies

 

[unregistered]

 

[Que]

A manufactured crisis - perfect description. It took decades of burning fossil fuels to accomplish it, but manufactured it is.

...to accomplish "it?"

What exactly is the "it" that has been "accomplished?"

No one knows to what extent man's influence has had as far as impact on the 1/2 of a degree Celsius. More Co2 since has had no effect. So what, exactly is the "it" of which you speak?

 

[miles]

George Carlin Nails It

 

[unregistered]

 

[Que]

I am not surprised that the one science class Al Gore ever took he got a D.



George Carlin on global Warming.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Vettepoof, Miles the Schmuck and Queerbait: Teh Axis of Ignorance.

 

[unregistered]

 

[nakedboater69]

Global Warming must be true or they wouldn't be allowed to say it on the Democrat run news media.

 

[FGB]

Global Warming must be true or they wouldn't be allowed to say it on the Democrat run news media.

Why not?

It was first broadcast from there and still is.

 

[phrodeau]

I am tired of dredging up information to educate the deniers on this site, and I know that they won't bother to learn, but here it is anyway.

HOW WE KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT PEOPLE ARE CAUSING CLIMATE CHANGE

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/outreach/isotopes/index.html

 

[FGB]

I am tired of dredging up information to educate the deniers on this site, and I know that they won't bother to learn, but here it is anyway.

HOW WE KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT PEOPLE ARE CAUSING CLIMATE CHANGE

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/outreach/isotopes/index.html

Yeah and we also know for sure the climate is always changing regardless if mankind is around or effecting it or not.

Always has and always will.

You can bankrupt the whole damned planet with no guarantee it will change the weather one way or the other.

What we do know it that the weather is changing as it always has and it looks like some changes in living conditions and locations are in order.

Like it or not.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Yeah and we also know for sure the climate is always changing regardless if mankind is around or effecting it or not.

Always has and always will.

You can bankrupt the whole damned planet with no guarantee it will change the weather one way or the other.

What we do know it that the weather is changing as it always has and it looks like some changes in living conditions and locations are in order.

Like it or not.

Let's ignore climate for a moment.

Does burning fossil fuels have a negative impact on the air we breathe?

 

[PoppingTom]

Yeah and we also know for sure the climate is always changing regardless if mankind is around or effecting it or not.

No. You, the believer, know that. Like you know God exist and the sun is turning around the earth...

 

[PoppingTom]

Does burning fossil fuels have a negative impact on the air we breathe?

According to Beijing inhabitants, no, not at all. Just a little smoke, nothing serious.

 

[Que]

Let's ignore climate for a moment.

Does burning fossil fuels have a negative impact on the air we breathe?

So you are advocating nuclear power then? Finally something I can agree with!

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

So you are advocating nuclear power then? Finally something I can agree with!

I don't think I'd be in favor of nuclear powered cars.

 

[Que]

I don't think I'd be in favor of nuclear powered cars.

We already have those.

Although the mostly run on coal and natural gas.

 

[Que]

Me spidey and Dr. Patrick Moore all advocate we build some Nuke plants, pronto!

http://forumonenergy.com/2013/07/22/the-pro-nuclear-environmentalist-movement-a-qa-with-dr-patrick-moore/

Moore: Yes, I would say any policy aimed at reducing fossil fuel consumption would be an advantage for nuclear energy: for producing electricity, for charging batteries in electric vehicles, for powering large ships, for running heat pumps, etc.

My support for reducing fossil fuel use has more to do with conservation, pollution control and diversity of energy supply than with climate. There are many factors at work [regarding climate change], most of which we do not fully understand, so it is not possible to be certain about our role. We must be careful not to adopt energy policies that will have more severe real negative impacts than the postulated predictions of the climate alarmist camp.

Carbon dioxide is a tine part of the atmosphere...increasing it is not the sky is falling that Phrodeaux religiously believes it to be, but, lets leave the oil in the ground, go nuke and everyone wins.

Even Mike Yates, because he is mining for the cleanest, safest fuel on the planet.

 

[FGB]

I am tired of dredging up information to educate the deniers on this site, and I know that they won't bother to learn, but here it is anyway.

HOW WE KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT PEOPLE ARE CAUSING CLIMATE CHANGE

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/outreach/isotopes/index.html

RIGHT.

https://s.yimg.com/fz/api/res/1.2/A...7/Vostok_420ky_4curves_insolation_to_2004.jpg

https://s.yimg.com/fz/api/res/1.2/AlgCTPn7cGonpi.IAvdagA--/YXBwaWQ9c3JjaGRkO2g9MTA5MjtxPTk1O3c9MTYwMA--/http://cdn.antarcticglaciers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Vostok_420ky_4curves_insolation_to_2004.jpg




https://s.yimg.com/fz/api/res/1.2/jqSraxxT7xI4TQR6tb6nKA--/YXBwaWQ9c3JjaGRkO2g9MzI4O3E9OTU7dz01NTM-/http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/images/petit150.jpg