Bitch in Business: Feminist parody of Megan Trainor song

[LadyFunkenstein]

Here is the video, purportedly made by Columbia Business School Graduates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPD0L0M7rtA

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

A 20 year old woman posted that on FB which is how I came across it.

Let's set aside the obvious fact that no one wants to work with a bitch (nor does anyone want to work with an asshole) and ask what the video is promoting. Is it equality, which is what we are supposed to believe? I think not.

The real point of the video is to brainwash women into becoming corporate slaves with pointless lives other than work. It pretty well hints at the life style of every successful business woman I know. What does that life consist of outside of slaving away at a desk?

Booze:

And more booze:

And a little more drinking:

A little double fisted boozing:

And pointlessly fucking someone you don't give a shit about (with booze of course)

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

And of course having no children:

 

[Littlefinger]

Modern feminism is primarily focused on forcing everyone to apologize for women being born women. It is inherently misogynistic the way that it attempts to degrade everything biologically and psychologically wonderful about femininity and being a woman. Turning women into men benefits men, not women.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Modern feminism is primarily focused on forcing everyone to apologize for women being born women. It is inherently misogynistic the way that it attempts to degrade everything biologically and psychologically wonderful about femininity and being a woman. Turning women into men benefits men, not women.

What is the end game? What is the goal?

 

[unregistered]

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

A new order of Matriarchy.

The point being what exactly?

 

[unregistered]

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

A female dominated society. A legal system of totally imposed equality with men. A legal system that recognizes and addresses the need for male assistance to the biological fact (motherhood) of female existence, and mandates the forcible redistribution of male productivity to that end, without a marriage contract. A trendy need to return to the matriarchy that existed before the existence of civilization that created patriarchy.

Of course, there's blood yet to be spilled and social compacts to be destroyed, but the end isn't too far off.

But why? Who benefits? I mean, really benefits?

 

[BotanyBoy]

The point being what exactly?

Time for guys to sit at home eating bon bon's and watching our soaps while you go turn a 60 hr work week to pay for it.

And if you don't like it better think twice, the marriage licence says I get half of everything, inc your paycheck for the next xx years.

Equality is awesome isn't it?

 

[BotanyBoy]

But why? Who benefits? I mean, really benefits?

Men by far.....

 

[unregistered]

 

[Que]

But why? Who benefits? I mean, really benefits?

Individual feminists are the ones that hope to benefit. Like any other herd that promotes anything else the benefits that particular group.

Typically, women unable to leverage the traditional advantages of charm and beauty that some but not all women possess. It isn't a conspiracy, just a gaggle of angry women. looking to get what the feel has been denied them individually.

They see some women, prettier and more successful than them and want their hypothetical 23% raise. Feminism is actually more about hatred and envy of other women that are more successful at leveraging femininity, than it is about hatred and envy of men, although it is also that.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Individual feminists are the ones that hope to benefit. Like any other herd that promotes anything else the benefits that particular group.

Typically, women unable to leverage the traditional advantages of charm and beauty that some but not all women possess. It isn't a conspiracy, just a gaggle of angry women. looking to get what the feel has been denied them individually.

They see some women, prettier and more successful than them and want their hypothetical 23% raise. Feminism is actually more about hatred and envy of other women that are more successful at leveraging femininity, than it is about hatred and envy of men, although it is also that.

I don't really care about who hopes to benefit. I want to know who DOES benefit. Certainly the ruling class benefits. The ruling elite. The billionaires. I am a great consumer, I have plenty of money with no purpose so I am self indulgent. Perhaps that is the real point of feminism. I certainly "benefitted" from it.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Time for guys to sit at home eating bon bon's and watching our soaps while you go turn a 60 hr work week to pay for it.

And if you don't like it better think twice, the marriage licence says I get half of everything, inc your paycheck for the next xx years.

Equality is awesome isn't it?

There is no such thing as equality. The entire concept is a myth.

 

[unregistered]

 

[BotanyBoy]

You forget the legal system in which a married man loses his home, the custody of his children, the best of both cars, and half his income, just to get rid of of a shitty wife; a system where he continues to pay child support for up to 18 years, while allowing the shitty wife to remarry and start a new life. Meanwhile he can hardly afford to find a place to live and go out on Friday night. I had two employees who faced over 12 years of court ordered claims on their wages, totally wiping out their incentives to produce, having went from $20 per hour employees to $11 per hour employees.

I assure you to the tune of just under 140k I will never forget that legal system.

I know the system in a LOT of states/counties it is heavily slanted in favor of mom to the point even in dual income homes where neither parent is home and a nanny raises the kids, just short of her catching a felony charge she's getting whatever the fuck she wants and he's FUUUUUUUUCKED.

That's changing thought.....

Lot more stay at home dad's and dual income households now % wise than even 15 years ago much less 30-50. Still a relatively small % but one growing quickly and as slanted as our family courts are they aren't entirely one sided either. Verified SHD? Mom is the one gone 90 hrs a week, she is the boozed out workaholic avoiding the family ??

You wouldn't have to hire a half decent lawyer to crucify her in court if you wanted to, 200$ bus stop special Divorce Dave Attorney at Law will get you hooked up no problem.

Now as that trend continues who do you think it benefits more? The workaholic mom who's now living in the hood and driving a civic because hubby got the house/cars and 30-50% of her take home till the kids graduate HS??

Or the dad still in the gated community, cooking and cleaning in his 2500-4000 sq ft house and taking the kids to bake sales, scout and school club meetings in the new Lexus SUV they got last year?

SHD's will come out on top.....

 

[BotanyBoy]

There is no such thing as equality. The entire concept is a myth.

Duh....but the american crusade for it isn't and THAT is very much a double edged sword with perks and pitfalls for both sides.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Is it this?

http://www.bitrebels.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/men-women-spending-habits-infographic.png

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

And this?

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-08-06-MenvsWomenSavings.png

 

[BotanyBoy]

I don't know what the fuck you're talking about....

Or what baring it has on who benefits the most from a gender role reversal with mom as head of household and dad staying home with the children.

What did I miss?

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

I don't know what the fuck you're talking about....

Or what baring it has on who benefits the most from a gender role reversal with mom as head of household and dad staying home with the children.

What did I miss?

My thread isn't about having mom as head of household, you went there. In fact I think the end game is being childless as per the "eggs freezin" still shot at the top.

My thread asks who benefits from promoting lifestyle of being a drunken corporate wage slave for women.

Is it companies like DeBeers?

http://terylhenderson.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/right-hand.jpeg

 

[BotanyBoy]

My thread isn't about having mom as head of household, you went there. In fact I think the end game is being childless as per the "eggs freezin" still shot at the top.

True but you don't think career driven women in the corporate world won't want families?

I'm sure some won't but I bet a good % of them do.

My thread asks who benefits from promoting lifestyle of being a drunken corporate wage slave for women.

Is it companies like DeBeers?

http://terylhenderson.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/right-hand.jpeg

Everyone does...from the slave driver to all the other slave drivers who have another customer with money to spend out there to sell to.

 

[unregistered]

 

[BotanyBoy]

I think in some cases you're correct but I'm not sure it's an all encompassing societal trend. SHD's are only those responsible enough to do so.

When men are killed on the battlefield, thrown into jail, die early, drop out to roam the streets and get stoned, or get divorced, or some other form of societal catastrophe, the Matriarchal family unit reemerges. It's what society reverts into when we attack or fail to maintain the system of Patriarchy that comes with civilization.

The female role is biological fact. Before organized civilization and much like the nature of lower mammal groups, the female is the permanent member of social groups, the male is the transient. Think of it this way, brothers and sisters all have but one mother, but could have many fathers. In 19th Century Africa a man did not bequeath his belongings to his children, but to the children of his sister, his closest blood relatives. Some didn't know their fathers, and retained the notion that only women had children.

Romans viewed maternity as natural fact "natura verum," and to the existence of Paternity as a mere matter of civil law. A reference to the state of Patriarchy as a creation of civil society.

Modern feminism either by plan, or by accident, is breaking down society and returning it to an uncivilized state, requiring legal intervention against men, in order for modern matriarchal groups to survive.

Modern feminists see their feminist movement into Matriarchy as an advancement of society, when in fact it is a degeneration into a lower state of human existence.

Two questions...

What exactly about patriarchy = civility?

And

What exactly about matriarchy = lower state of human existence?