The Obamacare Hoax

[unregistered]

 

[kbate]

You mean that for centuries, media ran at a loss?

I think your pop-psy analysis is a bit off. They become who they are and want to change the world, for the better, most of the starting at the local level where every day they see humanity at its worst and people having the worst day of their life. No one has to teach them to editorialize, what may have actually happened is that editors simply stopped telling them not too having hired them for thinking just like they do.

I didn't say "Media ran at a loss". You said that and your moronic buddy Veggebigot ran with it.

 

[kbate]

Good natured?



She's gone from being sarcastic to just plain hateful angry bird.

your idea of 'hateful' is also quite odd.

disagree with anything in your philosophy = hate.

ok.

 

[Que]

I didn't say that!

I may have said the opposite of (what i didn't say) was not true but I never said that the thing that would be opposite to that was true. Show me where I said the words that were easily inferred from my statement!!

 

[miles]

Originally Posted by BoyNextDoor View Post
No.

In 1974 Nixon was run out of office under threat of impeachment for lying to the American people about committing a crime.

In 1999 Clinton was not impeached because sane people do not think getting a blowjob is a crime, nor was it the mandate of the Whitewater Special Prosecutor if he was getting extramarital head.

Clinton was indeed impeached, but he wasn't convicted. You don't know the meaning of the word. Google is your friend.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Maybe you need to review the actual articles of impeachment. So you don't look like an idiot.

ac·quit·tal
əˈkwid(ə)l/
a judgment that a person is not guilty of the crime with which the person has been charged.

Now let's use it in a sentence: Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, was impeached by the House of Representatives on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice, on December 19, 1998. Two other impeachment articles, a second perjury charge and a charge of abuse of power, failed in the House. He was acquitted of both charges by the Senate on February 12, 1999.


Word of the day: id·i·ot
ˈidēət/Submit

a stupid person.
synonyms: fool, ass, halfwit, dunce, dolt, ignoramus, cretin, moron, imbecile, simpleton, vetteman

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

your idea of 'hateful' is also quite odd.

disagree with anything in your philosophy = hate.

ok.

Nothing new from Cap'n Victimhood. Any attack on his ideas is treated as an attack on his person. His position has always been rules for thee but not for me, has been since pretty much the beginning of his time here.

 

[MeeMie]

Advised of the likelihood of both impeachment and conviction, Nixon avoided both by resigning on August 9.

On September 8 the new president, Gerald R. Ford, issued him a "full, free and absolute pardon."

Ironically, the fact that Nixon was "pardoned," as opposed to "acquitted," implied guilt for crimes for which he was neither tried nor convicted.











.

 

[miles]

Advised of the likelihood of both impeachment and conviction, Nixon avoided both by resigning on August 9.

On September 8 the new president, Gerald R. Ford, issued him a "full, free and absolute pardon."

Ironically, the fact that Nixon was "pardoned," as opposed to "acquitted," implied guilt for crimes for which he was neither tried nor convicted.
.

Some people still think impeachment is removal from office, which it isn't.

What Nixon did was child's play compared with what The Fraud has perpetuated on the country.

 

[PayDay]

The other key to being a great salesman is honesty. A dishonest one gets zero repeat business. Once you lose credibility you have nothing.

This---^ (reiteration)

 

[PayDay]

Some people still think impeachment is removal from office, which it isn't.

What Nixon did was child's play compared with what The Fraud has perpetuated on the country.

Awesome. Totally right. The act of impeachment is to bring to trial.

 

[PayDay]

Advised of the likelihood of both impeachment and conviction, Nixon avoided both by resigning on August 9.

On September 8 the new president, Gerald R. Ford, issued him a "full, free and absolute pardon."

Ironically, the fact that Nixon was "pardoned," as opposed to "acquitted," implied guilt for crimes for which he was neither tried nor convicted.

Just another lie in posterity.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Some people still think impeachment is removal from office, which it isn't.

What Nixon did was child's play compared with what The Fraud has perpetuated on the country.

Yet the house has done nothing. Because there IS nothing impeachable, your constant whining aside.

 

[Sean Renaud]

The other key to being a great salesman is honesty. A dishonest one gets zero repeat business. Once you lose credibility you have nothing.

Glad you admit OBama's honest since according to you he lost all credibility sometime in 2009, weren't you one of the people who thought Hillary would run or the Dems would push to impeach him in the hopes that the stink would be gone by 2016? I'm not gonna dig up those posts I know you sure as hell weren't calling it bullshit.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Busybody]

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1112099

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[PayDay]

Anyone could take him to court.

Yet the house has done nothing. Because there IS nothing impeachable, your constant whining aside.

He can be brought to trial and found to be in violation of the Constitution or Oath of Office with ease, and then tried in a civilian court for any of the following:

Fraud, conspiracy, larceny, grand larceny, prisoner swaps, fast and furious, circumstancial/probability/hearsay/presumption, procurement, false advertising, intent to defraud, laundering, civil rights violation, abuse of appointment, etc...

This can be done simply on the basis of his impeachment or as an individual filing, or as a class action, regardless of political position.

All that needs to be done is prove, through brief/argument, is that anything was his intent beyond a reasonable doubt, and that that fact (whatever presented) cannot be reasonably argued against in either good conscience or evidence or person.

Corrupt officials do it all of the time to frame people, BO is actually guilty, so we should do it, not to teach him a lesson, but to enforce law and sovereignty of law and Constitution.

Being president only protects you if you served that office in good faith and within the public trust and Constitution.

BTW:
...I only see bobble heads whining.

 

[PayDay]

Glad you admit OBama's honest since according to you he lost all credibility sometime in 2009, weren't you one of the people who thought Hillary would run or the Dems would push to impeach him in the hopes that the stink would be gone by 2016? I'm not gonna dig up those posts I know you sure as hell weren't calling it bullshit.

That's not what he's saying at all:
Not all of us were sold on his bullshit.

BO never got his foot in the door with me either.

 

[RobDownSouth]

The other key to being a great salesman is honesty. A dishonest one gets zero repeat business. Once you lose credibility you have nothing.

No "repeat business"?

Remind me again who was re-elected in 2012, schmuck?

 

[PayDay]

No "repeat business"?

Remind me again who was re-elected in 2012, schmuck?

Show me the Federal certified election results totaled by state in one accessable list from Dec of 2012.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Oh the suppurating hate!

If fuels your existence, doesn't it?
Hey, it beats lookin' for a job!

 

[IrezumiKiss]

If you got something and you're that absolutely sure about it, then put it on the table and bring it to trial already.

All these years. All I see is talkin' about something.

And talkin' about something instead of doin' is just yappin'.

http://i.minus.com/ifDQILWRytszm.gif