Ominous prediction indeed.

So you didn't read through the article? Many of those CEOs didn't start those companies, and there is a huge fallacy that somehow they "earned" those golden parachutes. Many times they roll in, fuck a whole buncha people out of jobs, slash and burn, gut companies with lots of cash, create debt.. and move on. Mitt Romney is a part of all that and you idiots wanted him to be president.


The fact is, I am not against capitalism... but I do believe that unbridled, unregulated capitalism and greed are some of the most damaging things going on in this country. A post earlier showed that the top 85 in this country held more wealth than the bottom 3.5 billion. Any that thinks that is a good thing, that the obscene wealth disparity in this country is a good thing, are just ignorant.

The rest of it is just you talking out your ass, which you constantly do. You're not smart enough to think for yourself, much less me.

What you report really isn't capitalism anymore than hiring a prostitute is marriage.

Every CEO and business owner I know of wants to squash competition and fuck her employees. Its capitalism that keeps things functional because CEOs eat each other, too.

If you had your way we'd have a communist retail system where one store serves the peasants, one store serves the bureaucrats, and one store serves the perfumed princes. That is, one group eats assholes, another group eats genitals, and the princes eat filets and hams.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because it lifts union and government pay without improving performance or productivity.

You know, I understand that you accept that as an Article of Faith....is there any documented evidence of your belief? I'm not saying you're wrong, I just don't think I've ever seen anything to back up that claim.
 
What you report really isn't capitalism anymore than hiring a prostitute is marriage.

Every CEO and business owner I know of wants to squash competition and fuck her employees. Its capitalism that keeps things functional because CEOs eat each other, too.

It's the 2014 version of capitalism...and has been since the 80s.
 
The fact is, I am not against capitalism... but...

Fuck your "but"...

...you're for "capitalism" to the exact degree the Communist Party of China is; the difference being those communists are totally upfront about it with no "but" needed whatsoever.

Take comfort in the fact that you're hardly any different than all your other fellow travelers on this Board...

...thinking you're so collectively righteous covertly pontificating about forced wealth redistribution, but not having the gonads to actually stand up for it in today's America without the coward shield of "but".

The only difference between communism and socialism is that communists will use the literal hammer to rule with tyrannical force...

...socialists are simply communist pussies who favor the "democratic" vote, instead, to enact the very same tyrannical force.

Your communist proposals are ID'd as such by communism's supreme qualifier: force...

...take that force against individuals out of your utopian proposals and you'll immediately learn how "democratically" popular they are without that hammer of tyranny.

Now, wannabe, go back to being your usual, disingenuous self, posting on a "liberal" porn board, proclaiming how pro-choice you are, exalting what an open-minded person who see yourself as being, how no one should force their views on someone else...

...all the while being true to who you really are: a wannabe communist, a socialist, who champions the forced redistribution of individual wealth.
 
Fuck your "but"...

...you're for "capitalism" to the exact degree the Communist Party of China is; the difference being those communists are totally upfront about it with no "but" needed whatsoever.

Take comfort in the fact that you're hardly any different than all your other fellow travelers on this Board...

...thinking you're so collectively righteous covertly pontificating about forced wealth redistribution, but not having the gonads to actually stand up for it in today's America without the coward shield of "but".

The only difference between communism and socialism is that communists will use the literal hammer to rule with tyrannical force...

...socialists are simply communist pussies who favor the "democratic" vote, instead, to enact the very same tyrannical force.

Your communist proposals are ID'd as such by communism's supreme qualifier: force...

...take that force against individuals out of your utopian proposals and you'll immediately learn how "democratically" popular they are without that hammer of tyranny.

Now, wannabe, go back to being your usual, disingenuous self, posting on a "liberal" porn board, proclaiming how pro-choice you are, exalting what an open-minded person who see yourself as being, how no one should force their views on someone else...

...all the while being true to who you really are: a wannabe communist, a socialist, who champions the forced redistribution of individual wealth.


lol...*points and laughs at eeyore*


Meds run out?

Of course your rant was another example of your bullshit. There's nothing to argue with there cause it's all made up crap in your fucked up head. More of that queerbait ascription that runs rampant here. It's impossible to have any sort of discussion or discourse with you, because you are so extreme and such a lunatic. You're like the really angry version of Bunny.

Go fuck yourself too, yer just a bitchass little pussy boy with a big fucking mouth. You never seem to tire of being so pathetic. :rolleyes:

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ6lQw_mjgEb-3uqIgirR8QH89LuC_Xb0ceH0NYyJ9VG1U7qimd
 
So you didn't read through the article? Many of those CEOs didn't start those companies, and there is a huge fallacy that somehow they "earned" those golden parachutes. Many times they roll in, fuck a whole buncha people out of jobs, slash and burn, gut companies with lots of cash, create debt.. and move on. Mitt Romney is a part of all that and you idiots wanted him to be president.

Assumption. Party is irrelevant. There is always more than one definition to a word or phrase. How many Plumbers are working for a business they did not start?

The fact is, I am not against capitalism... but I do believe that unbridled, unregulated capitalism and greed are some of the most damaging things going on in this country. A post earlier showed that the top 85 in this country held more wealth than the bottom 3.5 billion. Any that thinks that is a good thing, that the obscene wealth disparity in this country is a good thing, are just ignorant.

The amount of wealth, I would think, is irrelevant. You obviously have a greater problem with how they made the money, as in 'shady tactics' -- something I think many in this thread would agree with, hence the good reading.

The rest of it is just you talking out your ass, which you constantly do. You're not smart enough to think for yourself, much less me.

You're joking right?
 
Well, chyeah, but...

...I know that I only need a certain amount of space to live in, one car to drive or one car to be driven in, one bed to sleep and fuck in, one toilet to shit and piss in, one shower to wash my ass in afterwards.

Granted, I'ma make sure all those are gonna done premium style, but there's no way I'm living longer than the money. I can't bend the laws of physics with more money. Obscene excess is exactly that.

If I made that kinda loot, I'm helping others because I'm basically part of the problem. Any way I can improve lives, even at my expense instead of further profit — which is outside of the profit I'm already making until I croak — I'm doing it. I ain't bitching about jack shit.

I don't know if you are allowed to post things that make this much sense....

...judges?
 
lol...*points and laughs at eeyore*


Meds run out?

Of course your rant was another example of your bullshit. There's nothing to argue with there cause it's all made up crap in your fucked up head. More of that queerbait ascription that runs rampant here. It's impossible to have any sort of discussion or discourse with you, because you are so extreme and such a lunatic. You're like the really angry version of Bunny.

Go fuck yourself too, yer just a bitchass little pussy boy with a big fucking mouth. You never seem to tire of being so pathetic. :rolleyes:

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ6lQw_mjgEb-3uqIgirR8QH89LuC_Xb0ceH0NYyJ9VG1U7qimd


You're cute when the callout nails you between the eyeballs, wannabe...

...in fact, you remind me of your good buddy tobob when you get all atwatter.

But, I digress...

...how 'bout getting back to your covert proposal of forced wealth redistribution you champion, like the good little timid socialist you are, here:

So you didn't read through the article? Many of those CEOs didn't start those companies, and there is a huge fallacy that somehow they "earned" those golden parachutes. Many times they roll in, fuck a whole buncha people out of jobs, slash and burn, gut companies with lots of cash, create debt.. and move on. Mitt Romney is a part of all that and you idiots wanted him to be president.


The fact is, I am not against capitalism... but I do believe that unbridled, unregulated capitalism and greed are some of the most damaging things going on in this country. A post earlier showed that the top 85 in this country held more wealth than the bottom 3.5 billion. Any that thinks that is a good thing, that the obscene wealth disparity in this country is a good thing, are just ignorant.
 
lol...*points and laughs at eeyore*


Meds run out?

Of course your rant was another example of your bullshit. There's nothing to argue with there cause it's all made up crap in your fucked up head. More of that queerbait ascription that runs rampant here. It's impossible to have any sort of discussion or discourse with you, because you are so extreme and such a lunatic. You're like the really angry version of Bunny.

Go fuck yourself too, yer just a bitchass little pussy boy with a big fucking mouth. You never seem to tire of being so pathetic. :rolleyes:

Eyer's just one of those sad acolytes of the Gump/VanMises TAXES BAD crew.
 
All Together Now

You still cling to the "No increase in prices despite all of these jobs having to go under American Labor laws" story while at the same time you and your 'bros' claim that a higher minimum wage will raise prices and destroy jobs".

So now how do you wish to reconcile your two theories about wages, job creation and market price?

Or is it just the, "That's another thread" thing?

Or do you also demand repeal of the minimum wage along with the expulsion order for 20 million illegals and while you're at it an end to social security, medicare, workman's comp and all taxes?
Hardly anyone makes minimum wage except for teens. What MW does is inflate union/government pay. From $7.25 to $10.10 is a 40% increase. If a union flag holder makes $30 an hour her pay will rise to $42 an hour. But there's no increase in prosperity because productivity remains the same. Therefore if the price of a Happy Meal stays the same McDonalds must trade teens for machines.
Who makes the minimum is irrelevant to this thread, but you're wrong about that claim as well.

Other wages do not track the minimum wage, in fact more jobs are dropped to the minimum than receive wage increases upon a government mandated raise the wage. Those who made 9 an hour will continue to make 9 an hour if the minimum wage becomes 9 an hour. The few who are worth more, will get raises 6 to 9 months after a minimum wage hike.

But nice try and nice red herring.
Perhaps that was true back a few decades ago when you last held gainful employment.

In today's economy, only 24% of minimum wage workers are teens.

1 out of 4.
JAMESBJOHNSON said:
Less than 5% of American workers make minimum wage.

LETS PUT THE MINIMUM WAGE ARGUMENT HERE!!! :D

JBJ'S 'Minimum Wage Is A Joke Because...' thread (recent)
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1107943

Orfeo's 'Does the Minimum Wage Kill Jobs?' thread (recent)
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1096323

My opinion + reading factoid:
04-18-2013, 06:23 AM (edited 11/26/2013)
http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=44165281&postcount=160
So for the Nerdspeakers

The minimum wage posted as federal average is based on what's known as a reservation wage:
to calculate and understand it for an individual(or group average),


go here
(it's a .doc)

Basically it is the balance point(or necessary Wage accumulation) needed between how much you have and how much you need. It takes into account how much you work vs. how much you want to work

+how often

04-11-2013, 10:23 AM
http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=43983679&postcount=73
Raising the minimum wage has never helped anything.

All it does is decrease the value of the currency and increase the cost of living

No Comprendo? K: Raise the money amount people make and business, therefore must increase the cost of the products to pay for it. It is not a businesses job to take the loss of $. That's anti free market.

Ever work at a fast food joint? $5 an hour is too much money. Ask me how iKnow.

Other Minimum Wage Threads:
'What We Do For Minimum Wage': (PG)
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=835401

'Minimum Wage Revisited': (GB, Ishmael)
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1034018

'CBO Says The Obama Plan To Raise Minimum Wage...' (GB, Vette)
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=996631

'Angry right’s secret revulsion: Why they really dodge minimum wage questions' (GB, Orfeo)
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=991843

'JohnnySavage's Minimum Wage Thread' (GB, the Laurel(s))
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=966042

'76% of Americans now favor raising the minimum wage' (GB, Orfeo)
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=954186

'Why is unemployment in Australia at 5.3% if their minimum wage is $16.43 in USD?' (GB)
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=905682

'GOP pushes back on raising minimum wage' (GB)
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=850151

'House Dems propose raising minimum wage from $7.25/hr to $10' (GB, Orfeo)
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=813580

Last one : (also oldest thread listed here)
***'Minimum Wage & Union Wages: You Pay for them...' (8/2011, GB, amicus)
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=773113

...add another link or re-quote an argument made, or whatever, or not.
 
Mastery of the In-house Ominous Prediction: Don't try:
'Stupid is a mean word."

Do you have the stupid disease?
...well maybe...

1st: 'Algae has bloomed on the boards'
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1107747

Then:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...ion-makes-nearly-HALF-stupid-lasts-YEARS.html
Found: The viral infection that makes nearly HALF of us more stupid (and it lasts for YEARS)

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/s...es-humans-more-stupid-discovered-9849920.html
Virus that 'makes humans more stupid' discovered

A virus that infects human brains and makes us more stupid has been discovered, according to scientists in the US.

The algae virus, never before observed in healthy people, was found to affect cognitive functions including visual processing and spatial awareness.*

Scientists at Johns Hopkins Medical School and the University of Nebraska stumbled upon the discovery when they were undertaking an unrelated study into throat microbes.

Surprisingly, the researchers found DNA in the throats of healthy individuals that matched the DNA of a virus known to infect green algae.

Dr Robert Yolken, a virologist who led the original study, said: “This is a striking example showing that the ‘innocuous’ microorganisms we carry can affect behaviour and cognition.
...
Of the 90 participants in the study, 40 tested positive for the algae virus. Those who tested positive performed worse on tests designed to measure the speed and accuracy of visual processing. They also achieved lower scores in tasks designed to measure attention.

Humans’ bodies contain trillions of bacteria, viruses and fungi. Most are harmless, but the findings of this research show that there some microbes can have a detrimental impact on cognitive functions, while leaving individuals healthy.

Pond Scum Facepalm.

Also: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States:
http://www.pnas.org/
(the report mentioned is not yet available or I couldn't find it)

*bonus: 'Algae: Better Than Ethanol'
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=695901
 
My opinion + reading factoid:
04-18-2013, 06:23 AM (edited 11/26/2013)
http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=44165281&postcount=160

That's some mighty thin gruel there. You give us the textbook definition of a reservation wage from a college midterm you found online. Please share with the class if you believe that the minimum wage is in fact a reservation wage, and if so, is it enough for a single person to live on.

Feel free to use your google-fu.
 
That's some mighty thin gruel there. You give us the textbook definition of a reservation wage from a college midterm you found online. Please share with the class if you believe that the minimum wage is in fact a reservation wage, and if so, is it enough for a single person to live on.

Feel free to use your google-fu.

I already did? Making an argument is not having an argument. The midterm is for info, not the question.
 
That's some mighty thin gruel there. You give us the textbook definition of a reservation wage from a college midterm you found online. Please share with the class if you believe that the minimum wage is in fact a reservation wage, and if so, is it enough for a single person to live on.

Feel free to use your google-fu.

Also, it is possible to live on minimum wage, just work more.
If you are unskilled labor, work harder, or get skills, like 'google-fu' (whatever the fuck that is). Problem solved.

Don't have enough money? work more.
 
I already did? Making an argument is not having an argument. The midterm is for info, not the question.

Okay, you made your argument somewhere. In the interim, you've been core-dumping data all over the place. Please link me to your argument.
 
Okay, you made your argument somewhere. In the interim, you've been core-dumping data all over the place. Please link me to your argument.

I gave you my opinion. It's the only thing I've ever said on Minimum Wage, anywhere. You even 'read' it.

If you disagree, that's fine, but tell me why you disagree. Telling my link is not applicable is a joke. If you don't think Mininum Wage is based on Reservation Wage, tell me why. I think it is, and I validated it with the formula, not the test. You explain what you believe.

SeanRenard uses the same tactics as you.

Everything I posted in this thread in a usable order. Learn to search.

What is your overall opinion on the subject of Minimum Wage? This topic is not about me or what my posting habits are.

Too lazy to fully read this thread to find out or do it yourself?
Here, dick: http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1107711&page=2#34

I'm also not 'core dumping' whatever that is. If you are not smart or intelligent enough to use the vBullentin system to it's full potential, that is not my fault nor something I need to fix or stop doing for you. You don't own this place.
 
This thread is Sean Renaud's shining hour.

I don't always agree with him, but he is unsurpassed at explaining both his points and the rationale behind his points.

I don't honestly expect anybody to always agree with me. I kinda hope we're north of 50/50 but I don't always agree with you.

Perhaps that was true back a few decades ago when you last held gainful employment.

In today's economy, only 24% of minimum wage workers are teens.

1 out of 4.

One of the interesting factoids there is that the number of people working at the minimum wage are only kinda sorta represented here. The article specifically mentions that the twenty four states with higher than national standards aren't represented in that because they aren't making "minimum wage" which for the terms of the article is a thing set federally. I'd be very curious to see what would happen if for the sake of argument they asked how many make less than say 10.00 an hour.

-snip-​


The fact is, I am not against capitalism... but I do believe that unbridled, unregulated capitalism and greed are some of the most damaging things going on in this country. A post earlier showed that the top 85 in this country held more wealth than the bottom 3.5 billion. Any that thinks that is a good thing, that the obscene wealth disparity in this country is a good thing, are just ignorant.
-snip-​

Capitalism seems to have "three" definitions. I don't mean what it means if you look it up. I mean what people actually mean when they say capitalism. One is what is actually laissez-faire capitalism. In short government stay out. The mere act of believing in borders means you aren't REALLY in this camp as I'll explain below. The second is meritocracy. In short the rich are rich because they are stronger, smarter, more beautiful whatever. The poor simply aren't. And the third is a sort of wishy washy thing that has no solid mass. I admit, that like taxes I've been known to occasionally slip back and forth between taxes (all of them) and federal income taxes in conversations. When I do and I'm called on it I apologize. Usually because I wasn't trying to be deceptive I just wasn't wasting words being precise.

You know the more and more I read people's opinions I don't think I've heard many if any people who are actually pro-capitalism. Every Republican here is in favor of strong borders which their primary (named) concern being the job market. Basic supply and demand tells us that would effect wages (and I've rarely heard a whole lot of opposition. The closest is that Americans won't do those jobs to which the counter is often they won't do them at those wages. We don't know how how much money it would take to get an American into the field. And an "economic theory" that I can't recall the name of of basically says that it still depends on comfort. At some point offering people money to do something they don't want to do will stop working. Anyway we haven't gone for that. And no I don't have a poll to prove this as fact.) by artificially restraining supply.

Giving Americans a monopoly on labor to jobs in the country is still a monopoly. A capitalist would be appalled. For whatever reason I have to keep stating this. I am not open borders. I do believe we have a right to protect Americans first and worry about others basically working our way outward. That does not change the fact that

I'm also pro-minimum wage or increaseing taxes on the rich and increasing social projects. It really doesn't matter to me how we feed, cloth, educate and protect the populace. I'm more interested in the ends ends than the means anyway.

I think everybody agrees, at least to some extent, with meritocracy. Nobody thinks that the best and brightest should be paid the same amount as the idiot who's barely getting by, or the average person. Or the above average person. There is reason, why the world in general and Americans in particular damn near build religions around guys like Steve Jobs or Steven Hawking or Steven Spielberg or Steven Colbert (and I wish lit had better spoilers cus I'm so tempted to see how far I go just naming Stevens.) Meritocracy is great.

We don't have one of those. What we have and often fight to preserve is an Oligarchy and the left seems to have more of a problem than the right with. But I honestly don't see how the above borders and forcing said rich under force of law to hire people from your chosen protected group isn't "fighting the power." They seemed pissed about the bailouts as well. I honestly think there is some tic in their mind where an idea is bad if it's not labeled properly. Like if you took the names involved with WWII and around so America was part of the Nazi Empire and the Germans and Japanese were called "America, FUCK YEAH" they'd magically change their opinions on every single action taken.

I think the sentimentality behind this picture explains it all.


I'm not sure if I should be proud of Republicans for being THAT good at branding, ashamed at Democrats for being too stupid to brand that way or ashamed of Democrats for having what often appears to be a case of Honor before reason.
 
So no one else (like dicks or douchebags) says it:

Pre-emptive Strike Ominous E-mail Prediction:

Got this tidbit in my e-mail, note the bold:
It was sent to me twice: (listed EST)

Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:15 AM
Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:35 PM
This message contains feedback for:
This feedback was sent by: Anonymous

Comments:

This is anonymous, right?* OK!

I love what you are spewing in the GB forums but you gotta slow the fuck down, I can't keep up!

I've also read a couple of stories, good stuff, I'll return to the rest later.

*DO NOT hit the REPLY button to respond to this email.*

=====================
Please Note: This feedback was sent by a visitor to the Literotica.com website without revealing any information about you to the person who wrote it. If you do not wish to receive anonymous feedback, you can log into the member area at Literotica.com and turn the option off for your account. If you have questions, please contact Webmaster@Literotica.com.

So shut it haters. Also, I'm already going slow as a public service, you all need to go faster.

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/71/haters-gonna-hate-black-and-whtie.gif
 
Back
Top