Okay, Hillary is shit; who now?

J

JAMESBJOHNSON

Guest
The Clinton brand is crap after last nite. Who does it for you now?
 
What? HRC is just as strongly positioned for a 2016 run now as she was before.
 
You kiddin? The next two years the MSM will trash The One and jump on the Hillary bandwagon.

They may do it but everyone got a good look up her skirt last night and it was nuthin to write home about.

I think she has to trash Obama every day till 2016 to get enough traction to destroy Elizabeth Warren and any dark horses, but that will piss off blacks too much. I mean, Hillary has to go on 60 MINUTES and talk about what a stupid nigger mother fucker Obama is and how he fucked everything up in Libya when she was screaming for him to do something. ITS WHY I QUIT. I COULDNT STOMACH THAT NIGGA ANOTHER DAY.
 
Anyone who can't see how the Clintons have distanced themselves from the administration even while putting in their "support" dues and have picked up favor chits all over the country with their support campaigning for individual Democratic candidates isn't too bright politically.
 
everyone the CUNT supported.....LOST

and if she doesn't now start calling Obola a DUMBASS MOFO ASSHOLE and STAB HIM in back and front.....CUNT is dead
 
I guess you haven't noticed what she's already been (clearly) saying between the lines (pretty much from the beginning of the current administration term). But it's OK if you didn't catch it. Makes you less likely to see it when it hits you in the back of the head. :D

She's made her distancing clear to those who aren't blinded by their ideology (and those making themselves vulnerable) and still has paid her party dues and picked up "I owe yous." Actually pretty clever of the Clintons--even in keeping folks like you blind to what's going on.

I'm not campaigning for them here--just giving them their due and setting up an "I told you so" when shallow thinking like yours comes back to haunt you.
 
I guess you haven't noticed what she's already been (clearly) saying between the lines (pretty much from the beginning of the current administration term). But it's OK if you didn't catch it. Makes you less likely to see it when it hits you in the back of the head. :D

She's made her distancing clear to those who aren't blinded by their ideology (and those making themselves vulnerable) and still has paid her party dues and picked up "I owe yous." Actually pretty clever of the Clintons--even in keeping folks like you blind to what's going on.

I'm not campaigning for them here--just giving them their due and setting up an "I told you so" when shallow thinking like yours comes back to haunt you.

She's a tainted rose with no mojo no mo. She and Obama are 2 dogs locked together.
 
What? HRC is just as strongly positioned for a 2016 run now as she was before.

In my opinion, Hillary's star is fading. When the Repubs present Obama with 300+ bills which he will be forced to veto, Hillary will feel the effects.

And if the Repubs get the economy moving again, Hillary will be finished.
 
There isn't a Democrat in any congressional seat in their home state of Arkansas. Hillary's shit is raggedy.

Haven't paid much attention, have you? Hillary's not from Arkansas. She from Chicago and, in terms of elected office, she last was a senator from New York. She pretty niftily separated herself from her husband too, to the extent it counts politically.

And I'm sure the Clintons are counting on the shallow thinkers out there, like you, to underestimate them.
 
And if the Repubs get the economy moving again, Hillary will be finished.

Of course, if Obama's administration gridlocks the congressional Republicans for the next two years like they've done to his administration for the last six, the Republican's chances in 2016 are toast. Americans, on the whole, aren't much deeper in thinking than you are being here. Might give that a thought--in case you want to do more than just bluster.

Just as Obama inherited a big mess when he entered office, the Republicans, now faced with responsibility to perform their own program, are walking into a big mess too--one that they created.
 
Of course, if Obama's administration gridlocks the congressional Republicans for the next two years like they've done to his administration for the last six, the Republican's chances in 2016 are toast. Americans, on the whole, aren't much deeper in thinking than you are being here. Might give that a thought--in case you want to do more than just bluster.

Just as Obama inherited a big mess when he entered office, the Republicans, now faced with responsibility to perform their own program, are walking into a big mess too--one that they created.

In case you haven't heard, the Repubs control all of congress.
 
(This to bunny slippers) And you always post here in a way that shows you are frightened to death of the Democrats. I'm sure they savor that. :D

Given the choices, yes, I did vote for Obama. But if you were old enough to trace forum posts back to 2008, you would have seen that I posted when he won the primaries that he grabbed for the office too soon--that he wasn't prepared to govern the way you have to govern in the United States. Pretty sure I was right in that judgment. (And, unlike you, apparently, my judgment had nothing to do with the color of his skin--or even with his party--or, for that matter, with dumbed-down ideology.)
 
Last edited:
In case you haven't heard, the Repubs control all of congress.

Yep. And Obama has a veto--and can still introduce legislation that embarrasses the hell out of the internally split Republican party. And he can appoint moderates to offices and point fingers at the Republicans when they continue to block appointments and obviously further gridlock business. And it's the administration that has to implement legislation--or not, maybe.

I guess you have to be a deeper thinker than you are to accurately assess "the enemy."

Your only salvation is that Obama probably doesn't play mean enough to do this well. Where's Lyndon Johnson when the Democrats need him? :D

The fact is that, strategically, the Republicans would have been better off to be one vote shy in the Senate (while sweeping all of the other elections they did) in this midterm and just keeping with the strategy they've been following. Now they have to show that they can govern and get things done--and their party is seriously fractured. Their victory in this election may cost them the next unless they now can completely change their strategies--and get away with doing so. Much harder to do than if they hadn't overwhelming taken the Senate.
 
Last edited:
Yep. And Obama has a veto--and can still introduce legislation that embarrasses the hell out of the internally split Republican party. And he can appoint moderates to offices and point fingers at the Republicans when they continue to block appointments and obviously further gridlock business.

I guess you have to be a deeper thinker than you are to accurately assess "the enemy."

You're only salvation is that Obama probably doesn't play mean enough to do this well. Where's Lyndon Johnson when the Democrats need him? :D



some ways, I wish that we would go to war with obama .... the obama way is the wrong way. obama is a criminal and needs to be ....
 
Yep. And Obama has a veto--and can still introduce legislation that embarrasses the hell out of the internally split Republican party. And he can appoint moderates to offices and point fingers at the Republicans when they continue to block appointments and obviously further gridlock business.

I guess you have to be a deeper thinker than you are to accurately assess "the enemy."

Your only salvation is that Obama probably doesn't play mean enough to do this well. Where's Lyndon Johnson when the Democrats need him? :D

The fact is that, strategically, the Republicans would have been better off to be one vote shy in the Senate (while sweeping all of the other elections they did) in this midterm and just keeping with the strategy they've been following. Now they have to show that they can govern and get things done--and their party is seriously fractured. Their victory in this election may cost them the next unless they now can completely change their strategies--and get away with doing so. Much harder to do than if they hadn't overwhelming taken the Senate.

And you forget who just lost the election. All things considered voters knew about GOP opposition, defiance, and obstruction. And Obama got his ass kicked hard yesterday. If he keeps on the way he's going voters wont elect any Democrat for President come 2016. You talk like a punch drunk drunk threatening to hurt my fist with your broken nose.
 
He can't introduce shit if the House and Senate leadership don't agree. All he can do is bullshit.

Didn't pass Government 101, I take it. Any senator can introduce bills. What happens to them afterward can come under public scrutiny.

Again, you guys aren't going to be very effective (not that blustering on an erotica story discussion board is being very effective anyway :D) if you underestimate the opposition out of by being a screamy, extremist ideologue.
 
Of course I don't. But I'm comfortable seeing how frightened you are about actually discussing what I posted, James. :D
 
Back
Top