So when will The Fraud issue an executive order granting amnesty to illegals?

[miles]

Now that his socialist policies have been widely rejected he'll be desperate to strike back and regain the spotlight. He has a presser this afternoon. I'm guessing within the next 30 days.

 

[Disgustipated]

Now that his socialist policies have been widely rejected he'll be desperate to strike back and regain the spotlight. He has a presser this afternoon. I'm guessing within the next 30 days.

Widely rejected? Have you been asleep the past 6 years? Fucking moron.

 

[dg]

Widely rejected in that there are a bunch of tiny, low population states and gerrymandered districts that aren't possible for Democrats to win. But sure, why not!

Country would be different if it was based on the popular vote of it's citizens and not a place where states with 50M people have the same Senate power as those with 10.

 

[miles]

Throb, shut your fucking toothless pie hole.

Moron.

 

[miles]

Widely rejected in that there are a bunch of tiny, low population states and gerrymandered districts that aren't possible for Democrats to win. But sure, why not!

Country would be different if it was based on the popular vote of it's citizens and not a place where states with 50M people have the same Senate power as those with 10.

Tiny states like Illinois and MA?

 

[Disgustipated]

Throb, shut your fucking toothless pie hole.

Moron.

Your obsession with the word throb while speaking about other men is telling.

 

[Amberchgo]

Country would be different if it was based on the popular vote of it's citizens and not a place where states with 50M people have the same Senate power as those with 10.

Not big on the Constitution eh?

 

[RobDownSouth]

Throb, shut your fucking toothless pie hole.

Moron.

Fuck you, kikebuddy.

ANYTHING I have to say to you I'll do using my ONLY userid. I'm not like you, "Xanophil", relying on alts.

Your children should die in a fire.

 

[Liar]

Wait, what socialist policies?

 

[garbage can]

Now that his socialist policies have been widely rejected he'll be desperate to strike back and regain the spotlight. He has a presser this afternoon. I'm guessing within the next 30 days.

He has to do it before January.....

 

[RobDownSouth]

He has to do it before January.....

What can he do now that he can't do in January? Federal judges, to be sure....anything else?

Last time I checked, the House was still enthralled to the forces of Satan (Republicans).

 

[Sean]

Wait, what socialist policies?

I keep asking that. Never got a straight answer yet.

 

[Killswitch]

Your obsession with the word throb while speaking about other men is telling.

Not to mention up until that point rob hadn't posted in the thread yet.

lol

 

[RobDownSouth]

Not to mention up until that point rob hadn't posted in the thread yet.

lol

He's gotten really bad lately. He had a string of consecutive days a few weeks back where he got up and made a single post around four in the morning his time, just to bash me. Then I guess he went back to bed.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean]

Only in the Senate to balance out the constitutional the power of more populous states in the House. The Constitution couldn't have been ratified under the parameters you suggest.

60% of state governorships in Republican hands. Republican majority in the House biggest since 1929, and a decisive majority in the Senate, is a wide rejection of the Democrat Party, its agenda, its President.

And again, nothing about how anyone voted FOR the GOP.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Only in the Senate to balance out the constitutional the power of more populous states in the House. The Constitution couldn't have been ratified under the parameters you suggest.

60% of state governorships in Republican hands. Republican majority in the House biggest since 1929, and a decisive majority in the Senate, is a wide rejection of the Democrat Party, its agenda, its President.

Gotta love the Vettepussy calling the slimmest of Republican majorities in the Senate a "wide rejection of the Democrat Party".

 

[cowslinger64]

And again, nothing about how anyone voted FOR the GOP.

That's exactly it. The platform the entire GOP ran on was:

Obama = Bad.



What a bunch of monumental idiots.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

He has the luxury of time.



He might want to wait until he either vetoes a Republican plan, or he signs it and then undoes it with signing statements. All he has to do is send his surrogates out to tell his constituents-in-waiting that the administration is going to have a hands-off attitude towards their presence and any state stupid enough to do anything about them will feel the full wrath and fury of the Justice Department and alphabet-bureaucracies innumerable in count and unlimited in the power to ruin a state's economy.

 

[unregistered]

 

[garbage can]

That's exactly it. The platform the entire GOP ran on was:

Obama = Bad.



What a bunch of monumental idiots.

I agree, the GOP has no balls.

They could get off to a good start by slamming the door on executive action, pass an energy bill which includes federal land, shut down the southern border, lower corporate taxes, reform welfare and more.

Keeping in mind that Obama has veto power.

 

[unregistered]

 

[cowslinger64]

They didn't need to run on anything else, and apparently it was quite popular and reflecting the majority of voter opinion, as they voted their support for the message.

Obviously, the majority of voters knew full well the failure of Obama, his agenda, his lawlessness, his fucked up economics, his idiot foreign policy, his support for illegality in his administration, his party agenda and his stonewalling, needed no further amplification.

Actually it showed the ignorance and outright stupidity of you and your kind. It showed the influence of fox news, and how easy it is to suck people in with sound bites. You make up shit all the time and yet most, if not all is pure garbage.


You're a fuckin moron vette. Really. I'm not just saying that. Unfortunately, there are too many like you.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I agree, the GOP has no balls.

They could get off to a good start by slamming the door on executive action, pass an energy bill which includes federal land, shut down the southern border, lower corporate taxes, reform welfare and more.

Keeping in mind that Obama has veto power.

Payday sez vetoes don't matter, now that Republicans have a majority in the Senate, Democrats will flock to their banner and we'll amend the Constitution to enshrine a permanent Republican majority licketty-split.

 

[garbage can]

Payday sez vetoes don't matter, now that Republicans have a majority in the Senate, Democrats will flock to their banner and we'll amend the Constitution to enshrine a permanent Republican majority licketty-split.

I'm thinking if the Repubs put a Keystone pipeline bill on Obama's desk and Obama vetos it. Can the Repubs get enough Dems lined up to override the veto?