Why Conservatives Opt for Propaganda Over Reality

KingOrfeo

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 27, 2008
Posts
39,182
From AlterNet:

AlterNet / By Amanda Marcotte

Why Conservatives Opt for Propaganda Over Reality

Conservatives are consuming a right-wing media full of lies and misinformation, whereas liberals are more interested in media that puts facts before ideology.

October 22, 2014


Pew Research set out to find what’s behind what it considers the increasing political polarization of the United States; why the country is moving away from political moderation and becoming more and more divided between liberals and conservatives. Its first report on the phenomenon, which examines where people are hearing news and opinion in both regular and social media, shows that this is happening for very different reasons among people moving to the right than for people moving to the left.

Or that’s the charitable way to put it. The less charitable way is to say Pew discovered that conservatives are consuming a right-wing media full of lies and misinformation, whereas liberals are more interested in media that puts facts before ideology. It’s very much not a “both sides do it” situation. Conservatives are becoming more conservative because of propaganda, whereas liberals are becoming more liberal while staying very much checked into reality.

That this polarization is going on isn’t a myth. Previous Pew research shows the percentage of Americans who are “mostly” or “consistently” conservative has grown from 18% in 2004 to 27% in 2014. During that same period, the percentage of Americans who are “mostly” or “consistently” liberal stayed a little more consistent, growing from 33% to 34% in 10 years. (These statistics don’t measure what you call yourself, but what you rate as on a scale of beliefs about various issues.) While liberals became more liberal, conservatives both became more numerous and more rigidly conservative over time. What gives?

Enter right-wing media, which has a nifty trick of convincing audiences it’s the other guys who are the liars, all while actually being much less trustworthy in reality. From conservative screaming about the “media elite” to Fox News’s old slogan “Fair and Balanced,” conservative media is rife with the message that everyone is out to get you, conservative viewer, and only in the warm blanket of right-wing propaganda will you be safe.

The message, the Pew research suggests, has really taken hold. Pew researchers gave respondents a list of 36 popular media sources and asked how much they trusted each one. Some were liberal, like The Daily Show or ThinkProgress. Some were conservative, like Rush Limbaugh or Fox News. Most of them are fairly straightforward news organizations with no overt political agenda, like NPR, various network news, CNN, and the New York Times.

The findings were astounding. Out of the 36 news sources, consistent liberals trusted 28, a mix of liberal and mainstream news sources. Mostly, liberal respondents generally agreed, holding out a little more skepticism for overtly ideological sources like Daily Kos or ThinkProgress, but not actually distrusting them, either. The only news sources liberals didn’t trust, generally, are overtly right-wing ones, such as Fox News, the Blaze, Breitbart, or Rush Limbaugh’s show.

Conservatives, on the other hand, saw betrayers and liars around every corner. Consistent conservatives distrusted a whopping 24 out of 36 outlets and mostly conservative respondents distrusted 15 and were skeptical of quite a few more. The hostility wasn’t just to well-known liberal sources like MSNBC. Strong conservatives hated all the network news, CNN, NPR, and the major national outlets, except the Wall Street Journal. Respondents who are mostly conservative fared better, but were still hostile to the New York Times and the Washington Post, as well as skeptical of mainstream organizations like CBS and NBC News.

The fact that conservatives are this paranoid should be alarming enough, but it becomes even more frightening when you consider who conservatives do trust in the media. Consistent conservatives only trusted 8 media sources--compared to the 28 liberals trusted--and of the eight, only one has anything approaching respectable reporting or reliable information. And that one, the Wall Street Journal, has good straight reporting but has an op-ed page that is a train wreck of right-wing distortions and misinformation. Most conservative people were a little more open-minded, trusting USA Today and ABC News, but still were supportive of openly distorting sources like Fox News or the Drudge Report.

The trust conservatives put in conservative media is utterly misplaced. For instance, both consistent and mostly conservative people love Glenn Beck, though he’s a well-known purveyor of outrageous conspiracy theories that percolate up to him from fringe characters. Breitbart and Sean Hannity also rated high, despite their shared history of championing right-wing fringe characters like Cliven Bundy.

But what is really frightening is the reach of Fox News. Fox News rated as the only real news source for consistent conservatives, with 47% of them citing it as their main source of news. Nothing even came close to touching it, as the second most common answer, “local radio” was cited by only 11% of consistent conservatives. Eighty-eight percent of consistent conservatives trusted Fox News. Mostly conservative and even “mixed” people also liked Fox News.

The problem with this is watching Fox News actually makes you less informed than if you don't watch any news at all. In a 2012 study, Fox News viewers rated the absolute lowest in ability to correctly answer questions on a quiz about recent news events. People who didn’t take in any news programs at all did better on the quizzes. NPR listeners rated the best. Consistent liberals in the Pew research were big fans of NPR, by the way. It was the second most common outlet cited as a favorite by consistent liberals, topped only by CNN.

Fox News is one of the main factors, possibily the main factor, driving political polarization in this country. Huge chunks of this country listen mostly or solely to a relentless stream of misinformation coming from Fox News, coupled with warnings, implied or even baldly stated, to avoid listening to other, more factually accurate news sources. Unsurprisingly, then, more people are becoming conservatives and people who were already conservative are becoming more hardline about it. If you have any Fox viewers in your family, you probably already suspected this, but now Pew has given us the cold, hard facts to confirm your suspicions.

Amanda Marcotte co-writes the blog Pandagon. She is the author of "It's a Jungle Out There: The Feminist Survival Guide to Politically Inhospitable Environments."
 
Anyone that says to research the facts is usually labeled as anti-conservative and a liberal loony.
 
And I abhor Sean Hannity. He's incredibly smug and self-centered.
 
Anyone that says to research the facts is usually labeled as anti-conservative and a liberal loony.

i've found just the opposite.

democrats have no monopoly over truth, and they certainly are known to cast a blind eye over facts that don't support their cause.

politicians are ALL the same .
 
closed-mindedness in America...brought to you today by Jezuz and Patriotism ™ bro!

Stew
 
I just wonder when one of these blogs will finally convince Americans that watching Fox News is really bad for you. I mean, they are so well written by such important scholars that more people should take them seriously.:rolleyes:
 
this is awesome! I hate to quote KingofAssTards for posting propaganda



From AlterNet:

AlterNet / By Amanda Marcotte

Why Conservatives Opt for Propaganda Over Reality

Conservatives are consuming a right-wing media full of lies and misinformation, whereas liberals are more interested in media that puts facts before ideology.

October 22, 2014


Pew Research set out to find what’s behind what it considers the increasing political polarization of the United States; why the country is moving away from political moderation and becoming more and more divided between liberals and conservatives. Its first report on the phenomenon, which examines where people are hearing news and opinion in both regular and social media, shows that this is happening for very different reasons among people moving to the right than for people moving to the left.

Or that’s the charitable way to put it. The less charitable way is to say Pew discovered that conservatives are consuming a right-wing media full of lies and misinformation, whereas liberals are more interested in media that puts facts before ideology. It’s very much not a “both sides do it” situation. Conservatives are becoming more conservative because of propaganda, whereas liberals are becoming more liberal while staying very much checked into reality.

That this polarization is going on isn’t a myth. Previous Pew research shows the percentage of Americans who are “mostly” or “consistently” conservative has grown from 18% in 2004 to 27% in 2014. During that same period, the percentage of Americans who are “mostly” or “consistently” liberal stayed a little more consistent, growing from 33% to 34% in 10 years. (These statistics don’t measure what you call yourself, but what you rate as on a scale of beliefs about various issues.) While liberals became more liberal, conservatives both became more numerous and more rigidly conservative over time. What gives?

Enter right-wing media, which has a nifty trick of convincing audiences it’s the other guys who are the liars, all while actually being much less trustworthy in reality. From conservative screaming about the “media elite” to Fox News’s old slogan “Fair and Balanced,” conservative media is rife with the message that everyone is out to get you, conservative viewer, and only in the warm blanket of right-wing propaganda will you be safe.

The message, the Pew research suggests, has really taken hold. Pew researchers gave respondents a list of 36 popular media sources and asked how much they trusted each one. Some were liberal, like The Daily Show or ThinkProgress. Some were conservative, like Rush Limbaugh or Fox News. Most of them are fairly straightforward news organizations with no overt political agenda, like NPR, various network news, CNN, and the New York Times.

The findings were astounding. Out of the 36 news sources, consistent liberals trusted 28, a mix of liberal and mainstream news sources. Mostly, liberal respondents generally agreed, holding out a little more skepticism for overtly ideological sources like Daily Kos or ThinkProgress, but not actually distrusting them, either. The only news sources liberals didn’t trust, generally, are overtly right-wing ones, such as Fox News, the Blaze, Breitbart, or Rush Limbaugh’s show.

Conservatives, on the other hand, saw betrayers and liars around every corner. Consistent conservatives distrusted a whopping 24 out of 36 outlets and mostly conservative respondents distrusted 15 and were skeptical of quite a few more. The hostility wasn’t just to well-known liberal sources like MSNBC. Strong conservatives hated all the network news, CNN, NPR, and the major national outlets, except the Wall Street Journal. Respondents who are mostly conservative fared better, but were still hostile to the New York Times and the Washington Post, as well as skeptical of mainstream organizations like CBS and NBC News.

The fact that conservatives are this paranoid should be alarming enough, but it becomes even more frightening when you consider who conservatives do trust in the media. Consistent conservatives only trusted 8 media sources--compared to the 28 liberals trusted--and of the eight, only one has anything approaching respectable reporting or reliable information. And that one, the Wall Street Journal, has good straight reporting but has an op-ed page that is a train wreck of right-wing distortions and misinformation. Most conservative people were a little more open-minded, trusting USA Today and ABC News, but still were supportive of openly distorting sources like Fox News or the Drudge Report.

The trust conservatives put in conservative media is utterly misplaced. For instance, both consistent and mostly conservative people love Glenn Beck, though he’s a well-known purveyor of outrageous conspiracy theories that percolate up to him from fringe characters. Breitbart and Sean Hannity also rated high, despite their shared history of championing right-wing fringe characters like Cliven Bundy.

But what is really frightening is the reach of Fox News. Fox News rated as the only real news source for consistent conservatives, with 47% of them citing it as their main source of news. Nothing even came close to touching it, as the second most common answer, “local radio” was cited by only 11% of consistent conservatives. Eighty-eight percent of consistent conservatives trusted Fox News. Mostly conservative and even “mixed” people also liked Fox News.

The problem with this is watching Fox News actually makes you less informed than if you don't watch any news at all. In a 2012 study, Fox News viewers rated the absolute lowest in ability to correctly answer questions on a quiz about recent news events. People who didn’t take in any news programs at all did better on the quizzes. NPR listeners rated the best. Consistent liberals in the Pew research were big fans of NPR, by the way. It was the second most common outlet cited as a favorite by consistent liberals, topped only by CNN.

Fox News is one of the main factors, possibily the main factor, driving political polarization in this country. Huge chunks of this country listen mostly or solely to a relentless stream of misinformation coming from Fox News, coupled with warnings, implied or even baldly stated, to avoid listening to other, more factually accurate news sources. Unsurprisingly, then, more people are becoming conservatives and people who were already conservative are becoming more hardline about it. If you have any Fox viewers in your family, you probably already suspected this, but now Pew has given us the cold, hard facts to confirm your suspicions.

Amanda Marcotte co-writes the blog Pandagon. She is the author of "It's a Jungle Out There: The Feminist Survival Guide to Politically Inhospitable Environments."
 
Reality scares conservatives.
They'd rather retreat to the warm comfortable cocoon of an imaginary "Leave It To Beaver" world that never existed.
 
i've found just the opposite.

democrats have no monopoly over truth, and they certainly are known to cast a blind eye over facts that don't support their cause.

politicians are ALL the same .

But RWs and LWs on the Intertubes are not all the same. AllyRose' comment, "Anyone that says to research the facts is usually labeled as anti-conservative and a liberal loony," holds true here.
 
I just wonder when one of these blogs will finally convince Americans that watching Fox News is really bad for you. I mean, they are so well written by such important scholars that more people should take them seriously.:rolleyes:

Fox viewers appear to be largely both 'Net-averse and higher-education-averse. See here.

When I finally pulled the handle for Obama in 2012, my father could not believe how far I’d fallen. I have avoided talking politics with him as much as possible ever since. Last week, I invited him to my house for dinner with the express purpose of talking about politics and most especially his Fox News addiction. Since he retired, he only watches Fox. As we started chatting up politics, I repeated one mantra over and over: “Please, please, consume another source of information.” I repeated my plea a dozen times. He defended with stridency his choices, citing his favorites, like Stuart Varney, “The Five” and the great Charles Krauthammer. When it came to any other source of information he was emphatic.

“I don’t care to see any more of that liberal bullshit,” he said in one form or another all night.

* * *

I don’t recall my father being so hostile when I was growing up. He was conservative, to be sure, but conventionally and thoughtfully so. He is a kind and generous man and a good father, but over the past five or 10 years, he’s become so conservative that I can’t even find a label for it.

What has changed? He consumes a daily diet of nothing except Fox News. He has for a decade or more. He has no email account and doesn’t watch sports. He refuses to so much as touch a keyboard and has never been on the Internet, ever. He thinks higher education destroys people, not only because of Fox News, but also because I drifted left during and after graduate school.

I do not blame or condemn my father for his opinions. If you consumed a daily diet of right-wing fury, erroneously labeled “news,” you could very likely end up in the same place. Again, this is all by design. Let’s call it the Fox News effect. Take sweet, kindly senior citizens and feed them a steady stream of demagoguery and repetition, all wrapped in the laughable slogan of “fair and balanced.” Even watching the commercials on Fox, one is treated to sales pitches for gold and emergency food rations, the product cornerstones of the paranoid. To some people the idea of retirees yelling at the television all day may seem funny, but this isn’t a joke. We’re losing the nation’s grandparents, and it’s an American tragedy.
 
Reality scares conservatives.
They'd rather retreat to the warm comfortable cocoon of an imaginary "Leave It To Beaver" world that never existed.

This is true.

Our current crop of conservatives are not really conservatives in the old political definition of the word. They are reactionaries who feel the government is obligated to preserve the lifestyle to which they feel entitled.

The feel like they are under siege by those who would take away their right to drive 80mph and burn cheap gasoline on a road that someone else paid to build.

When a person is in this state of mind, they'll believe anything that aligns with their prejudices or brings them comfort.
 
Last edited:
JG's Rules of Propaganda

6. To be perceived, propaganda must evoke the interest of an audience and must be transmitted through an attention-getting communications medium. (yell on TV)

7. Credibility alone must determine whether propaganda output should be true or false. (can we sell it)

11. Black rather than white propaganda may be employed when the latter is less credible or produces undesirable effects. (he voted for food banks COMMIE)

12. Propaganda may be facilitated by leaders with prestige.(read populist loudmouth)

13c. A propaganda theme must be repeated, but not beyond some point of diminishing effectiveness. (self explanatory)

14. Propaganda must label events and people with distinctive phrases or slogans.(pick one)

a. They must evoke desired responses which the audience previously possesses.(ever been scared or frustrated)
b. They must be capable of being easily learned.(dumb it down)

c. They must be utilized again and again, but only in appropriate situations. (see 13c)

d. They must be boomerang-proof. (duh)

15. Propaganda to the home front must prevent the raising of false hopes which can be blasted by future events.(the world is ending, the world is ending)

18. Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred. (again pick one)

19. Propaganda cannot immediately affect strong counter-tendencies; instead it must offer some form of action or diversion, or both.(Roman Emperors gave free bread and put on games to divert the mobs attention)
 
When you follow the link, you get to an opinion piece from a left-wing site that is basing its remarks on yet another left wing blog.

When you go to the actual Pew report and poll...

:eek:

Well, let us just say that some of the analysis presented is a bit imaginative in its reading between the lines with the key consistent partisan measure being 12% Democrat and 9% conservative.

And the dislike of the opposing party discussed here is almost as acute among leaners as partisans. Today, nearly as many Republican leaners (40%) as Republicans (46%) express very unfavorable opinions of the Democratic Party, and the steep growth in deeply negative views is seen in both groups.

On the left, Democratic leaners are somewhat less likely than Democratic identifiers to hold strongly negative views of Republicans (42% of Democrats and 30% of Democratic leaners have a very unfavorable opinion of the GOP). Still, the overall growth in antipathy is just as pronounced among leaners as among Democrats.

Now add in the 3% greater number of Democrats and you have an even divide, something we already know.

Even worse mostly liberal and consistently liberal is 34%, mostly conservative and consistently conservative is 27% putting, as KO want to present it, the PROPAGANDA ball actually further into the other court with a 7% advantage to the Liberals.

:rolleyes:

Lies, damned lies and STATISTICS!
 
The lies of Rush Limbaugh have been documented since 1994. FOX News won a lawsuit to protect its right to lie.

Nevertheless, I think liberals should examine their conscience when it comes to believing things they want to believe, and disbelieving things they do not want to believe.

Several years ago I read an article in The New York Times that said that liberals do not want to be told bad things about blacks and homosexuals.

In 1998 Matthew Shepard was killed by two men he picked up in a bar. For months that was in the news. There is even a Matthew Shepard Foundation.

At about the same time a thirteen year old boy was raped and tortured to death by two adult homosexuals. That was not national news. I did not learn about it until years later.

http://www.wnd.com/2002/09/15294/

Black ghetto thugs kill whites all the time. When George Zimmerman killed a black ghetto thug who attacked him from behind it made the six o'clock news.

The failure of No Child Left Behind substantiates arguments found in The Bell Curve. Unfortunately, liberals continue to pretend that Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein have been "conclusively refuted."
 
Last edited:
liberals [sic] smoke the obama [sic] ass juice [sic]


those [sic] that vote for liberals (aka the new socialist party) want access to other people's money.

I am trying to help you with the GED. See if you can correct the errors I've pointed out.
 
lots of people drinking the kool aid

Yes, but, almost all of them are RWs. (I say "almost" to allow for 9/11 Truthers, GMO alarmists, lefty anti-vaxxers, nuclear-power alarmists, etc.; but it is all immeasurably worse on the right, where even a mainstream political party will whore itself for lies and nonsense, which the Dems as a group by and large will not.)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top