Ebola now confirmed in NYC

Can you define what our foreign policy is?

Additionally, in Egypt, Libya, Syria and Iraq, did his civil servants follow his plan? or did they botch it leaving him free of any and all responsibility? After all, he bears the same responsibility for failure as Bush, no???

There ya go with the AJ switch. Nice try.
 
There ya go with the AJ switch. Nice try.

I'm sorry, what's the switch? You are really confusing me now. The President takes credit for all sorts of things, like saving Detroit, but when anything seems to go wrong, there is this subtle 'switch' to the President is not really in charge, he has people for that, he's just an idea guy. What was his great idea for saving Detroit and why did the "saved" city end up in bankruptcy?

I clearly remember the Bush years and the daily litany of how Bush was personally responsible for every single "failure" of government, and now, after six years of Obama, we seem to have an evolution of thought that the President isn't responsible for the failures of government, he just sets policy...

Can you explain, in something more substantial than a flippant blurt just what the hell I am missing in this new nuance?
 
I did not claim to know why some folks want additional government. Nor did I say no one controlled it for that matter. And I would guess if you check the numbers you'd find we have fewer people working in government now than a few years ago.

That's because a law was written that took a huge number of workers off book as "contractors."

More people than ever are funded by tax dollars.
 
He wants open borders. He wants South America here. He wants Haiti here. He wants East Africa here. He wants the voters, he wants the 'investments' in diversity, he wants the demonstrable need for government services. Their baggage can easily by skycapped by such a rich and populous nation. If he cannot get our wealth to them, he can sure as hell get them to come to us to enjoy the benefits of their birthright as a global community.


What in God's name does any of this drivel have to do with an American doctor returning to the United States?
 
What in God's name does any of this drivel have to do with an American doctor returning to the United States?

Really?

The President has made it clear that his policy is not to quarantine everyone in country, but to allow them to travel freely to the US where when they get sick, they will self-report to one of his five designated hospitals and we will contain ebola.

What are the designated hospitals for ev-d68?

What's the policy there?
 
I'm sorry, what's the switch? You are really confusing me now. The President takes credit for all sorts of things, like saving Detroit, but when anything seems to go wrong, there is this subtle 'switch' to the President is not really in charge, he has people for that, he's just an idea guy. What was his great idea for saving Detroit and why did the "saved" city end up in bankruptcy?

I clearly remember the Bush years and the daily litany of how Bush was personally responsible for every single "failure" of government, and now, after six years of Obama, we seem to have an evolution of thought that the President isn't responsible for the failures of government, he just sets policy...

Can you explain, in something more substantial than a flippant blurt just what the hell I am missing in this new nuance?

The switch: I say the President establishes foreign policy. You demand I explain his policy. I did not defend or even say I understand his policy. You wanted an example of a Presidential responsibility, so I gave you one. Don't complicate and obfuscate and flip the debate to Detroit. As I said in another thread, an argument with you is never over until you declare yourself the winner.
 
That's because a law was written that took a huge number of workers off book as "contractors."

More people than ever are funded by tax dollars.

You would need to prove this, because lately you have been posting a lot of opinion as fact. You know, like network news being a loss leader without knowing what their revenues or profits even are.
 
The switch: I say the President establishes foreign policy. You demand I explain his policy. I did not defend or even say I understand his policy. You wanted an example of a Presidential responsibility, so I gave you one. Don't complicate and obfuscate and flip the debate to Detroit. As I said in another thread, an argument with you is never over until you declare yourself the winner.

Okay, now apply this to ebola and his policy that we cannot contain it on the ground where it is.

Is he responsible for cases getting here, or is hat a failure of his civil servants?

I'm not declaring anything and Detroit is just another example of how, when something good happens, this President is a hands-on executive who takes the credit and spikes the ball (usually right before half-time) but if something goes wrong, he was unaware, out of the loop, not responsible and now I see his supporters going right along with this line of reasoning after spending not only eight years blaming Bush for everything, but have spent much of the last six-years still firmly blaming Bush. I am just confused as to what some people here actually believe about the office of the Presidency.

If ebola is shut down and proves to be of no further harm to this country, Obama will get all of the credit, again, but if it gets out of control, it will be just a few rogue agents and we will move one step closer to a legendary President...
 
Okay, now apply this to ebola and his policy that we cannot contain it on the ground where it is.

Is he responsible for cases getting here, or is hat a failure of his civil servants?

I'm not declaring anything and Detroit is just another example of how, when something good happens, this President is a hands-on executive who takes the credit and spikes the ball (usually right before half-time) but if something goes wrong, he was unaware, out of the loop, not responsible and now I see his supporters going right along with this line of reasoning after spending not only eight years blaming Bush for everything, but have spent much of the last six-years still firmly blaming Bush. I am just confused as to what some people here actually believe about the office of the Presidency.

If ebola is shut down and proves to be of no further harm to this country, Obama will get all of the credit, again, but if it gets out of control, it will be just a few rogue agents and we will move one step closer to a legendary President...
:cool:SPITS a wad of CHEWIN Tobacca and punches da doggy:cool:
 
they believe a COLOR D and a CUNT D is immune

they believe all R's are TERRORISTS and hate women and gaze
 
they believe a COLOR D and a CUNT D is immune

they believe all R's are TERRORISTS and hate women and gaze

they believe they can RIDICULE Bush who warned of Fannie and Freddie

and KISS B Frank who blocked action

and

BLAME BUSH
 
You would need to prove this, because lately you have been posting a lot of opinion as fact. You know, like network news being a loss leader without knowing what their revenues or profits even are.

We, not you and I, had this conversation many times in the past few years.

I am not inclined to go looking for the thread or reproving it at this point.

One of the fallacies was pointing to the recession and conflating state, county and city layoffs with the Federal government. The other, was as I pointed out, the move to subcontractors. But look, especially with baseline budgeting and the natural proclivity to growth not just in government, but the economy in general where natural population growth produces a natural backdrop of job growth, one cannot imagine there exists, in government where it continues to spend money, take on more responsibilities (ACA), more mission creep and be shedding jobs, other than the military, which might be being counted in too, a proclivity to shed jobs.

The military is not protected by civil-service public sector unions.

Can you show me an instance, even in the worst of times, the mass Federal Government layoffs?
 
they believe that Bush got a warning in Aug about 9/11.....same warning that was around since 1996, and Clitman DIDNT take OBL when he was offered by Sudan or kill him when he could
 
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/10/24/1414119276230_wps_58_NYPD_Police_take_down_cau.jpgShocking moment bumbling cops leave Ebola doctor's apartment and dump their protective gloves and masks in a sidewalk trash can
New York City police officers were sent to mark of Dr. Craig Spencer's Harlem apartment building today
Spencer is the first confirmed patient with Ebola in the city
After the officers were done, they were seen throwing their gloves, masks and caution tape in a public trash can on the street


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-trash-city-sidewalk-leave.html#ixzz3H4IeaxG6
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
they believe the STATE and CITY (non)response in Katrina was Bush's fault

but

Obola (non) response to SANDY was perfect
 
Okay, now apply this to ebola and his policy that we cannot contain it on the ground where it is.

Is he responsible for cases getting here, or is hat a failure of his civil servants?

I'm not declaring anything and Detroit is just another example of how, when something good happens, this President is a hands-on executive who takes the credit and spikes the ball (usually right before half-time) but if something goes wrong, he was unaware, out of the loop, not responsible and now I see his supporters going right along with this line of reasoning after spending not only eight years blaming Bush for everything, but have spent much of the last six-years still firmly blaming Bush. I am just confused as to what some people here actually believe about the office of the Presidency.

If ebola is shut down and proves to be of no further harm to this country, Obama will get all of the credit, again, but if it gets out of control, it will be just a few rogue agents and we will move one step closer to a legendary President...

The President along with all intelligent people take the ebola issue seriously. Health workers will come and go and some cases of the virus will occur here. Don't be so hung up on blame or credit, be more interested that protocols have been established and are followed. That appears to be happening now. You want this politicized like you want everything to be politicized. Everyone here knows this.
 
They believe that Cunt Clinton who NO ONE can come up with ONE EXAMPLE of an accomplishment is suited for WH

But

S Palin a successful Governor was an idiot


They believe that Obola who submitted NO BILLS, voted PRESENT most of the time, was a COMMUNITY ORGANIZER, was suited for the WH

But

S Palin was an IDIOT
 
The President along with all intelligent people take the ebola issue seriously. Health workers will come and go and some cases of the virus will occur here. Don't be so hung up on blame or credit, be more interested that protocols have been established and are followed. That appears to be happening now. You want this politicized like you want everything to be politicized. Everyone here knows this.

depends on how juan defines

TAKES ISSUE SERIOUSLY


Im sure DRECK is happy Im on IGGY, cause he is being smashed by a mere BUNNY
 
They believe that Obala, who had ZERO accomplishments was suited for the WH

But

H Caine, a success in all aspects of life and M Romney a success in ALL aspects of life


WERE IDIOTS and OUTA TOUCH


THEY "BELIEVE" THAT
 
The President along with all intelligent people take the ebola issue seriously. Health workers will come and go and some cases of the virus will occur here. Don't be so hung up on blame or credit, be more interested that protocols have been established and are followed. That appears to be happening now. You want this politicized like you want everything to be politicized. Everyone here knows this.


damn dude, put down the ass juice. its not even lunch time and your high on the derp
 
Back
Top