Two Years In Jail for British 'Net Trolls

R. Richard

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
Posts
10,382
You're not going to find much support from R. Richard for two years in jail for Internet Trolls. The traditional British penalty of 'drawn and quartered' is much more fitting. JMNTHO.

Britain threatens Internet 'trolls' with two years in jail
AFP

People found guilty of Internet 'trolling' in Britain could be jailed for up to two years under government proposals outlined, following a number of high-profile case of abuse on Twitter

People found guilty of Internet "trolling" in Britain could be jailed for up to two years under government proposals outlined, following a number of high-profile case of abuse on Twitter.

London (AFP) - People found guilty of Internet "trolling" in Britain could be jailed for up to two years under government proposals outlined on Sunday, following a number of high-profile cases of abusive and threatening behaviour on Twitter.

Justice Secretary Chris Grayling told the Mail on Sunday newspaper: "This is a law to combat cruelty -- and marks our determination to take a stand against a baying cyber-mob."

There has been increasing concern in Britain about the growing scourge of Internet "trolls" who post hate-filled messages on social media, often threatening their targets.

The parents of missing girl Madeleine McCann are among the most recent victims, and last month a man was jailed for 18 weeks for what prosecutors described as "a campaign of hatred" against a female lawmaker.

"These internet trolls are cowards who are poisoning our national life. No-one would permit such venom in person, so there should be no place for it on social media," Grayling said.

"That is why we are determined to quadruple the current six-month sentence."

Victims have long been calling for police and prosecutors to take online abuse more seriously and lawyers had anticipated an increase in sentences for those convicted of trolling.

"There is a public interest in having people put away for a long time," Chris Holder, of London law firm Bristows, told AFP earlier this month.

"It is putting someone in fear of their life and fear of physical harm. I think the law will develop and the sentences will go up and up."

However, some lawyers and freedom of speech campaigners have warned that criminal sanctions should be the last resort.

"Do we want to criminalise every social conduct that we find problematic?" Barbora Bukovska, a senior director at campaign group ARTICLE 19, said earlier this month.

Prosecutions can currently be brought under a number of different laws, but the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) last year introduced guidelines to address any confusion.

It said messages sent via social media could be a criminal offence if they contain "credible threats of violence" or target an individual in a way that "may constitute harassment or stalking".

The government proposes to amend two existing laws to extend the maximum jail term and also the time limit for prosecutions, from six months to three years.
 
The Nanny state at work...oh nos, must protect the poor innocent....whatever.


Freedom of speech is a joke in the UK. Afraid a simple word or two will offend. :eek:
 
The Nanny state at work...oh nos, must protect the poor innocent....whatever.


Freedom of speech is a joke in the UK. Afraid a simple word or two will offend. :eek:

That's probably because the teachers are more interested in 'ticking boxes' and helping students to Pass rather than Understand the subject, particularly English.

It's even worse in the cases of racial equality.
 
That's probably because the teachers are more interested in 'ticking boxes' and helping students to Pass rather than Understand the subject, particularly English.

I would agree that they have been forced to do this by the requirements placed on their continued employment. I wouldn't necessarily agree that it reflects what they were interested in doing with their jobs.
 
I would agree that they have been forced to do this by the requirements placed on their continued employment. I wouldn't necessarily agree that it reflects what they were interested in doing with their jobs.

Yep, this.

I know many teachers who are pissed off at targets coming before teaching. This happens everywhere now, everything is tick boxes rather than understanding.

This has been happening for a long time now in this country. I had a driving instructor who taught me to reverse park by telling me turn wheel exactly how much one way, how much another, to judge by certain stickers on the car when to do what. He never taught me to drive. Hadn't got a clue what I was doing after I passed my test. But the way he taught me somehow got me through the test.
(I actually learnt to park in the Costa del Sol, two years later, when I had to do it at least six times a day.)

My Welsh oral exams consisted of me going into a room and spouting off phrases I had learnt by rote, I had know no idea what they actually meant, or how they were constructed. It was just a test of how well I could pronounce them. I got an A. I had a friend who speaks fluent Welsh got a C.

Whereas for my French exams, I could've easily answered the questions in five different ways, and happily kept talking. A*
(I had another friend who answered in German all through her French oral, which I think is pretty fucking impressive. What wasn't impressive is that the assessor didn't find a way to tell her she was speaking the wrong language throughout, and she failed it. In 'real situations', that would never happen.)



Back to the original point though, murder gets less, as long as the victim is on a bike.:mad:
 
The 'may' part at the end is worrysome, that is subject to endless interpretation and supercedes any factual evidence when 'may' is used at merit for prosectution.

'I have proof that it was a joke'
'Well it may not have been.'
 
Nah, I'd still much rather live here than in the US. This country's fucked, but yours is even more fucked.

I regret to say that I have to agree.
USA readers will, of course, have to understand that our knowledge is, at best, incomplete and we must judge these matters on incomplete information, rumour & newspaper reports.
:)
 
Indeed, though I think that ours is a minority view here.

It is the minority here too, but this isn't the GB.....there won't be five posters with their 40 alts attacking us for being racist because....well because the GB thinks everyone is somehow racist...except them.

What a herd over there, not an original thought amongst them. Never seen so many alleged adults sit around and laugh at the word cunt all day long.
 
I regret to say that I have to agree.
USA readers will, of course, have to understand that our knowledge is, at best, incomplete and we must judge these matters on incomplete information, rumour & newspaper reports.
:)

Probably ditto for us on the west side of the pond.
 
It is the minority here too, but this isn't the GB.....there won't be five posters with their 40 alts attacking us for being racist because....well because the GB thinks everyone is somehow racist...except them.

What a herd over there, not an original thought amongst them. Never seen so many alleged adults sit around and laugh at the word cunt all day long.

I'm the only racist who owns it.
 
Back
Top